Immunohistochemical Expressions of Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype and Its Association With Immune Microenvironments and Clinicopathological Factors in Invasive Breast Cancer

The dual role of cellular senescence in human tumor progression and therapy

Cellular senescence, one of the hallmarks of cancer, is characterized by cell cycle arrest and the loss of most normal cellular functions while acquiring a hypersecretory, proinflammatory phenotype. The function of senescent cells in cancer cells varies depending on the cellular conditions. Before the occurrence of cancer, senescent cells act as a barrier to prevent its development. But once cancer has occurred, senescent cells play a procancer role. However, few of the current studies have adequately explained the diversity of cellular senescence across cancers. Herein, we concluded the latest intrinsic mechanisms of cellular senescence in detail and emphasized the senescence-associated secretory phenotype as a key contributor to heterogeneity of senescent cells in tumor. We also discussed five kinds of inducers of cellular senescence and the advancement of senolytics in cancer, which are drugs that tend to clear senescent cells. Finally, we summarized the various effects of senescent cells in different cancers and manifested that their functions may be diametrically opposed under different circumstances. In short, this paper contributes to the understanding of the diversity of cellular senescence in cancers and provides novel insight for tumor therapy.

Therapy-Induced Senescence Contributes to the Efficacy of Abemaciclib in Patients with Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

PURPOSE

We conducted research on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) simultaneously in the preclinical and clinical spaces to gain a deeper understanding of how senescence influences tumor growth in humans.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We coordinated a first-in-kind phase II clinical trial of the CDK4/6i abemaciclib for patients with progressive dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) with cellular studies interrogating the molecular basis of geroconversion.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with progressing DDLS enrolled and were treated with 200 mg of abemaciclib twice daily. The median progression-free survival was 33 weeks at the time of the data lock, with 23 of 30 progression-free at 12 weeks (76.7%, two-sided 95% CI, 57.7%-90.1%). No new safety signals were identified. Concurrent preclinical work in liposarcoma cell lines identified ANGPTL4 as a necessary late regulator of geroconversion, the pathway from reversible cell-cycle exit to a stably arrested inflammation-provoking senescent cell. Using this insight, we were able to identify patients in which abemaciclib induced tumor cell senescence. Senescence correlated with increased leukocyte infiltration, primarily CD4-positive cells, within a month of therapy. However, those individuals with both senescence and increased TILs were also more likely to acquire resistance later in therapy. These suggest that combining senolytics with abemaciclib in a subset of patients may improve the duration of response.

CONCLUSIONS

Abemaciclib was well tolerated and showed promising activity in DDLS. The discovery of ANGPTL4 as a late regulator of geroconversion helped to define how CDK4/6i-induced cellular senescence modulates the immune tumor microenvironment and contributes to both positive and negative clinical outcomes. See related commentary by Weiss et al., p. 649.

Senescence in cancer: Advances in detection and treatment modalities

Senescence is a form of irreversible cell cycle arrest. Senescence plays a dual role in cancer, as both a tumor suppressor by preventing the growth of damaged cells and a cancer promoter by creating an inflammatory milieu. Stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) and replicative senescence are the two major sub-types of senescence. Senescence plays a dual role in cancer, depending on the context and kind of senescence involved. SIPS can cause cancer by nurturing an inflammatory environment, whereas replicative senescence may prevent cancer. Major pathways that are involved in senescence are the p53-p21, p16INK4A-Rb pathway along with mTOR, MAPK, and PI3K pathways. The lack of universal senescence markers makes it difficult to identify senescent cells in vivo. A combination of reliable detection methods of senescent cells in vivo is of utmost importance and will help in early detection and open new avenues for future treatment. New strategies that are being developed in order to tackle these shortcomings are in the field of fluorescent probes, nanoparticles, positron emission tomography probes, biosensors, and the detection of cell-free DNA from liquid biopsies. Along with detection, eradication of these senescent cells is also important to prevent cancer reoccurrence. Recently, the field of nano-senolytic and immunotherapy has also been emerging. This review provides up-to-date information on the various types of advancements made in the field of detection and treatment modalities for senescent cells that hold promise for the future treatment and prognosis of cancer, as well as their limitations and potential solutions.

A three-marker signature identifies senescence in human breast cancer exposed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Despite the beneficial effects of chemotherapy, therapy-induced senescence (TIS) manifests itself as an undesirable byproduct. Preclinical evidence suggests that tumor cells undergoing TIS can re-emerge as more aggressive divergents and contribute to recurrence, and thus, senolytics were proposed as adjuvant treatment to eliminate senescent tumor cells. However, the identification of TIS in clinical samples is essential for the optimal use of senolytics in cancer therapy. In this study, we aimed to detect and quantify TIS using matched breast cancer samples collected pre- and post-exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Detection of TIS was based on the change in gene and protein expression levels of three senescence-associated markers (downregulation of Lamin B1 and Ki-67 and upregulation of p16^INK4a).

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that 23 of 72 (31%) of tumors had a shift in the protein expression of the three markers after exposure to NAC suggestive of TIS. Gene expression sets of two independent NAC-treated breast cancer samples showed consistent changes in the expression levels of LMNB1, MKI67 and CDKN2A.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our study shows a more individualized approach to measure TIS hallmarks in matched breast cancer samples and provides an estimation of the extent of TIS in breast cancer clinically. Results from this work should be complemented with more comprehensive identification approaches of TIS in clinical samples in order to adopt a more careful implementation of senolytics in cancer treatment.

Insights into the role of senescence in tumor dormancy: mechanisms and applications

One of the most formidable challenges in oncology and tumor biology research is to provide an accurate understanding of tumor dormancy mechanisms. Dormancy refers to the ability of tumor cells to go undetected in the body for a prolonged period, followed by "spontaneous" escape. Various models of dormancy have been postulated, including angiogenic, immune-mediated, and cellular dormancy. While the former two propose mechanisms by which tumor growth may remain static at a population level, cellular dormancy refers to molecular processes that restrict proliferation at the cell level. Senescence is a form of growth arrest, during which cells undergo distinct phenotypic, epigenetic, and metabolic changes. Senescence is also associated with the development of a robust secretome, comprised of various chemokines and cytokines that interact with the surrounding microenvironment, including other tumor cells, stromal cells, endothelial cells, and immune cells. Both tumor and non-tumor cells can undergo senescence following various stressors, many of which are present during tumorigenesis and therapy. As such, senescent cells are present within forming tumors and in residual tumors post-treatment and therefore play a major role in tumor biology. However, the contributions of senescence to dormancy are largely understudied. Here, we provide an overview of multiple processes that have been well established as being involved in tumor dormancy, and we speculate on how senescence may contribute to these mechanisms.

Identification of senescence-related subtypes, establishment of a prognosis model, and characterization of a tumor microenvironment infiltration in breast cancer

Breast cancer is a malignancy with the highest incidence and mortality in women worldwide. Senescence is a model of arrest in the cell cycle, which plays an important role in tumor progression, while the prognostic value of cellular senescence-related genes (SRGs) in evaluating immune infiltration and clinical outcomes of breast cancer needs further investigation. In the present study, we identified two distinct molecular subtypes according to the expression profiles of 278 SRGs. We further explored the dysregulated pathways between the two subtypes and constructed a microenvironmental landscape of breast cancer. Subsequently, we established a senescence-related scoring signature based on the expression of four SRGs in the training set (GSE21653) and validated its accuracy in two validation sets (GSE20685 and GSE25055). In the training set, patients in the high-risk group had a worse prognosis than patients in the low-risk group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that risk score was an independent prognostic indicator. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis proved the predictive accuracy of the signature. The prognostic value of this signature was further confirmed in the validation sets. We also observed that a lower risk score was associated with a higher pathological response rate in patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We next performed functional experiments to validate the results above. Our study demonstrated that these cellular senescence patterns effectively grouped patients at low or high risk of disease recurrence and revealed their potential roles in the tumor–immune–stromal microenvironment. These findings enhanced our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment and provided new insights for improving the prognosis of breast cancer patients.