Ten Lessons From the Spanish Model of Organ Donation and Transplantation

Hospital-Related Determinants of Refusal of Organ Donation in France: A Multilevel Study

In a worldwide context of organ shortage, refusal of organ donation remains the main reason for the non-procurement of organs from deceased donors. Many studies have characterized the clinical or psychological factors of refusal but not organizational and structural factors in healthcare centers. We used multilevel logistic regression models with hospitals as a random effect to analyze organ procurement among 6734 potential brain-dead donors recorded in the national register in France in 2018 and 2019. According to the opt-out law, 29% of the potential donors refused to donate. Among hospital-related factors, low probability of refusal was related to hospitals audited for the organ donation process by the national program (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.94), hospitals with high inpatient satisfaction scores for care (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99) and facilities with a high ratio of nurse donor coordinators to donors (aOR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.64-0.95). Among clinical factors, the odds of refusal were associated with age younger than 65 years (18-49 years; aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.37-1.83) and donors with blood group B (aOR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10-1.59). Hospital-related factors are just as important as individual factors in the procurement of organs from potential brain-dead donors.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of organ, tissue, and cell donation in Nicaragua

Organ donation and transplantation are essential for improving the quality of life of people with organ failure due to chronic diseases (e.g., chronic kidney disease) or irreparable organ damage from accidents. In Nicaragua, chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu) has emerged as a significant public health challenge, disproportionally affecting young agricultural workers and leading to premature deaths. Despite enactment of Law 847 in 2013, which regulates organ donations and transplantation, Nicaragua faces critical challenges, including lack of awareness, inadequate infrastructure, and limited public dissemination on the value of organ donation leading to an increasing number of patients on waiting lists. To address these gaps, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding organ donation and transplantation in Nicaragua, a lower-middle-income country. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey among 4,407 Nicaraguan residents aged 18 and above from all 15 departments and two regions between November 2022 and February 2023. Most participants were women (60.3%), people aged 18-35 years (79.9%), and residents in urban areas (62.8%). The findings revealed that only 28.6% had good knowledge regarding organ and tissue donation and transplantation, 91.9% expressed positive attitudes toward organ and tissue donation, being willing to donate regardless of religious believes (88.5%) or personal health conditions (90.0%). About 72.6% engaged in donation-related behaviors. Men, those with higher education, and unemployed participants showed greater adherence to these practices. In summary, while Nicaraguans show positive attitudes towards organ and tissue donation and transplantation, significant knowledge and supply-demand gaps persist. Targeted educational campaigns and infrastructure development are urgently needed to address these gaps, enhance public awareness, and promote organ donation, particularly in the context of CKDu´s burden on public health.

Global transplantation: Lessons from organ transplantation organizations worldwide

Although national transplant organizations share common visions and goals, the creation of a unified global organization remains impractical. Differences in ethnicity, culture, religion, and education shape local practices and infrastructure, making the establishment of a single global entity unfeasible. Even with these social disparities aside, logistical factors such as time and distance between organ procurement and transplantation sites pose significant challenges. While technological advancements have extended organ preservation times, they have yet to support the demands of transcontinental transplantations effectively. This review presents a comparative analysis of the structures, operational frameworks, policies, and legislation governing various transplant organizations around the world. Key differences pertain to the administration of these organizations, trends in organ donation, and organ allocation policies, which reflect the financial, cultural, and religious diversity across different regions. While a global transplant organization may be out of reach, agreeing on best practices for the benefit of patients is essential.

Barriers and willingness to express consent to organ donation among the Kazakhstani population

BACKGROUND

Organ donation is a critical component of healthcare, yet donation rates in Kazakhstan remain low. Understanding the socio-demographic factors, knowledge levels, and perceived barriers influencing individuals' willingness to consent to organ donation is essential for developing effective interventions.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study surveyed 1,294 participants across Kazakhstan. The sample was predominantly female (78.3%), urban (79.4%), and well-educated, with a significant proportion having medical backgrounds. Data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge about organ donation, and perceived barriers. Comparison methods and binomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of willingness to express consent for organ donation.

RESULTS

Age, ethnicity, family status, and knowledge about organ donation were significant predictors of willingness to donate. Older participants and Russian ethnic group members were less likely to consent, while widowed individuals and those with higher knowledge levels were more likely to express consent. Although several factors did not have significant prediction with willingness to donate in the regression analysis, chi-square and U-tests revealed significant associations for residence, occupation, educational level, and religious affiliation. Key barriers to donation included distrust in the medical system, fears of organ trafficking, and insufficient awareness, particularly among non-medical participants. These barriers were significant deterrents and correlated with lower willingness to donate. However, due to the overrepresentation of urban, educated, and medical-affiliated participants in the sample, findings may not fully reflect the general population of Kazakhstan.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the need for targeted educational campaigns to increase public awareness and address misconceptions about organ donation. Building trust in the medical system and dispelling fears of unethical practices are essential for improving donation rates. The study underscores the complex interplay of socio-demographic factors, knowledge, and perceived barriers in shaping organ donation decisions in Kazakhstan, while also emphasizing the need for future research with a more representative sample.

Nurse Specialist in the Organ and Tissue Donation Process with Coordination Role: A Scoping Review

Background/Objectives: In recent years, the introduction of specialist nurses, such as donation coordinator nurses, has been proposed as a potentially effective strategy to increase the number of donations and improve the quality of the process. However, experiences in this field are still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the inclusion of this professional in health systems, both in quantitative and qualitative terms. Methods: A scoping review was performed. Studies published from 1990 to 2024 were included regardless of the study design. The bibliographic search was performed on the databases MedLine, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycInfo and on the search engines EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The search strings included keywords such as organ donation, transplant, procurement, and nursing role. The extraction and selection of articles were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and with the methodology of the Joanna Briggs Institute for scoping reviews. The protocol study was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework database on 3 December 2023, with registration number osf.io/wzxr3. Results: From the included studies, it emerged that the involvement of a nurse coordinator in the donation process is significantly associated with an increase in the number of organ donors and higher rates of family consent to donation. Additionally, the studies highlighted enhanced effectiveness in identifying potential donors and improvements in the training and preparedness of healthcare staff. Conclusions: The nurse coordinator in the donation process can have positive effects both on the management of the process and on the increase in the number of organ and tissue donations.

Making organ donation after circulatory death routine: Preserving patienthood and reproducing ways of dying in the intensive care unit

Controlled organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) was re-introduced in the UK in 2008, in efforts to increase rates of organs for transplant. Following reintroduction, there were debates about the ethics of DCD, including whether potential DCD donors receive end-of-life care which is in their best interests. Since this time, DCD has become a routine donor pathway in the NHS. In this article, we present findings from an ethnographic study examining the everyday practices of DCD in two English Trusts. Drawing on the concept of death brokering and Bea's (2020) call to consider organ donation as embedded and routine practice within health care, we look at how DCD is integrated into end-of-life care in intensive care units. We show how DCD is made routine at the end-of-life via the practices of health professionals who create an active separation between discussions about death and donation; reproduce usual ways of doing things in end-of-life care; and respect the distinction between patient/donor, dying and death. In doing so, we argue these function to preserve the patienthood of the potential donor, ensuring DCD operates as an integrated part, and culturally accepted form of, good end-of-life care for potential donors, their relatives, and health professionals alike.

A qualitative study exploring barriers and facilitators in deceased organ donation process among transplant coordinators in India

Although India's organ donation rate is less than 1 per million population, significant disparities exist between the regions and centres within the country, leading to varying consent rates among different organ donation centres. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the experience of transplant coordinators and their barriers and facilitators in the deceased organ donation process across various organ donation centres in India. A phenomenological study using interviews was conducted among fourteen transplant coordinators purposefully recruited from public and private organ donation centres in India, with experience between six years and more than a decade. Audio recordings were transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Five themes were identified namely: (1) supportive management policies, (2) infrastructure for the deceased organ donation process, (3) delays in the processing time, (4) active involvement in the identification process, and (5) explaining the concept of brain death. The study identifies that implementation priorities include strengthening teamwork, streamlining processes, optimising infrastructure for sensitive discussions, efficient donor identification, and empathetic handling of donor families' grief stages. Collaborating with law enforcement, applying successful medico-legal strategies, improving family communication, and clarifying brain death concepts ethically and legally can boost consent rates, fostering informed decisions and possibly achieving self-sufficiency in deceased organ donation.

Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Organ Donation Among Students and Professionals in Medical Colleges in the Eastern Part of India

BACKGROUND

 Organ transplantation is a critical, life-saving procedure revolutionizing healthcare. Despite medical advancements, there remains a global shortage of organs available for transplantation. This is more pronounced in India where the organ donation rate is significantly low.

OBJECTIVE

 To assess the knowledge and attitude toward organ donation among students and professionals in medical colleges of Patna, Bihar.

METHODS

 A cross-sectional study was conducted in three government medical colleges located in Patna that included 666 participants comprising faculty, resident doctors, nursing staff, medical and nursing students, and interns. Data were collected using a pre-designed structured questionnaire comprising a socio-demographic profile and knowledge and attitude of participants toward organ donation. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of study participants was 23±4.24 (SD). The majority (504, 75.7%) of participants were aged between 21 and 30 years and the majority (372, 55.9%) were females. There were significant differences in knowledge about organ donation across groups. Faculty and resident doctors demonstrated higher awareness (113, 73.9%) compared to others. Attitude toward organ donation was positive overall, with the majority (614, 92.2%) supporting organ donation campaigns. However, misconceptions about organ donation and its legal aspects persisted among participants.

CONCLUSION

 There is a need for targeted educational intervention to improve knowledge and dispel myths about organ donation among medical students and professionals.

The Impact of Early Brain-Dead Donor Detection in the Emergency Department on the Organ Donation Process in Iran

We aimed to assess the impact of hospital characteristics on the outcomes of detected possible brain-dead donors, in our organ procurement network in Iran. Data was collected through twice-daily calls with 57 hospitals' intensive care units and emergency departments over 1 year. The donation team got involved when there was suspicion of brain death before the hospital officially declared it. The data was categorized by hospital size, presence of neurosurgery/trauma departments, ownership, and referral site. Out of 813 possible donors, 315 were declared brain dead, and 203 were eligible for donation. After conducting family interviews (consent rate: 62.2%), 102 eligible donors became actual donors (conversion rate: 50.2%). While hospital ownership and the presence of trauma/neurosurgery care did not affect donation, early referral from the emergency department had a positive effect. Therefore, we strongly recommend prioritizing possible donor identification in emergency rooms and involving the organ donation team as early as possible. The use of twice-daily calls for donor identification likely contributed to the consistency in donation rates across hospitals, as this approach involves the donation team earlier and mitigates the impact of hospital characteristics. Early detection of possible donors from the emergency department is crucial in improving donation rates.

Validation of MELD3.0 in 2 centers from different continents

BACKGROUND

MELD3.0 has been proposed to stratify patients on the liver transplant waiting list (WL) to reduce the historical disadvantage of women in accessing liver transplant. Our aim was to validate MELD3.0 in 2 unique populations.

METHODS

This study is a 2-center retrospective cohort study from Toronto, Canada, and Valencia, Spain, of all adults added to the liver transplant WL between 2015 and 2019. Listing indications whose short-term survival outcome is not adequately captured by the MELD score were excluded. All patients analyzed had a minimum follow-up of 3 months after inclusion in the WL.

RESULTS

Six hundred nineteen patients were included; 61% were male, with a mean age of 56 years. Mean MELD at inclusion was 18.00 ± 6.88, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELDNa) 19.78 ± 7.00, and MELD3.0 20.25 ± 7.22. AUC to predict 90-day mortality on the WL was 0.879 (95% CI: 0.820, 0.939) for MELD, 0.921 (95% CI: 0.876, 0.967) for MELDNa, and 0.930 (95% CI: 0.888, 0.973) for MELD3.0. MELDNa and MELD3.0 were better predictors than MELD (p = 0.055 and p = 0.024, respectively), but MELD3.0 was not statistically superior to MELDNa (p = 0.144). The same was true when stratified by sex, although the difference between MELD3.0 and MELD was only significant for women (p = 0.032), while no statistical significance was found in either sex when compared with MELDNa. In women, AUC was 0.835 (95% CI: 0.744, 0.926) for MELD, 0.873 (95% CI: 0.785, 0.961) for MELDNa, and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.803, 0.970) for MELD3.0; differences for the comparison between AUC in women versus men for all 3 scores were nonsignificant. Compared to MELD, MELD3.0 was able to reclassify 146 patients (24%), the majority of whom belonged to the MELD 10-19 interval. Compared to MELDNa, it reclassified 68 patients (11%), most of them in the MELDNa 20-29 category.

CONCLUSIONS

MELD3.0 has been validated in centers with significant heterogeneity and offers the highest mortality prediction for women on the WL without disadvantaging men. However, in these cohorts, it was not superior to MELDNa.

Trends in organ donation in England, Scotland and Wales in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and 'opt-out' legislation

BACKGROUND

In May 2020, England implemented soft 'opt-out' or 'deemed consent' for deceased donation with the intention of raising consent rates. However, this coincided with the COVID-19 pandemic, making it difficult to assess the early impact of the law change. Wales and Scotland changed their organ donation legislation to implement soft opt-out systems in 2015 and 2021 respectively. This study provides a descriptive analysis of changes in consent and transplant rates for deceased organ donation in England, Scotland and Wales.

METHODS

Logistic regression and descriptive trend analysis were employed to assess the probability of a patient who died in critical care becoming a donor, and to report consent rates using data, respectively, from the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) in England from 1 April 2014 to 30 September 2021, and from the Potential Donor Audit for England, Scotland and Wales from April 2010 to June 2023.

RESULTS

The number of eligible donors in April-June 2020 were 56.5%, 59.3% and 57.6% lower in England, Scotland and Wales relative to April-June 2019 (pre-pandemic). By April-June 2023, the number of eligible donors had recovered to 87.4%, 64.2% and 110.3%, respectively, of their levels in 2019. The consent rate in England, Scotland and Wales reduced from 68.3%, 63.0% and 63.6% in April-June 2019 to 63.2%, 60.5% and 56.3% in April-June 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

While the UK organ donation system shows signs of recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of eligible potential donors and consent rates remain below their pre-pandemic levels.

Qualitative Content and Discourse Analysis Comparing the Current Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation in Spain and England

England switched to an opt-out system of consent in 2020 aiming to increase the number of organs available. Spain also operates an opt-out system yet has almost twice the organ donations per million population compared with England. We aimed to identify both differences and similarities in the consent policies, documents and procedures in deceased donation between the two countries using comparative qualitative content and discourse analysis. Spain had simpler, locally tailored documents, the time taken for families to review and process information may be shorter, there were more pathways leading to organ donation in Spain, and more robust legal protections for the decisions individuals made in life. The language in the Spanish documents was one of support and reassurance. Documents in England by comparison appeared confusing, since additions were designed to protect the NHS against risk and made to previous document versions to reflect the law change rather than being entirely recast. If England's ambition is to achieve consent rates similar to Spain this analysis has highlighted opportunities that could strengthen the English system-by giving individuals' decisions recorded on the organ donor register legal weight, alongside unifying and simplifying consent policies and procedures to support families and healthcare professionals.

Women Are Also Disadvantaged in Accessing Transplant Outside the United States: Analysis of the Spanish Liver Transplantation Registry

Sex inequities in liver transplantation (LT) have been documented in several, mostly US-based, studies. Our aim was to describe sex-related differences in access to LT in a system with short waiting times. All adult patients registered in the RETH-Spanish Liver Transplant Registry (2000-2022) for LT were included. Baseline demographics, presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, cause and severity of liver disease, time on the waiting list (WL), access to transplantation, and reasons for removal from the WL were assessed. 14,385 patients were analysed (77% men, 56.2 ± 8.7 years). Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was reported for 5,475 patients (mean value: 16.6 ± 5.7). Women were less likely to receive a transplant than men (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.63, 0.97) with a trend to a higher risk of exclusion for deterioration (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.99, 1.38), despite similar disease severity. Women waited longer on the WL (198.6 ± 338.9 vs. 173.3 ± 285.5 days, p < 0.001). Recently, women's risk of dropout has reduced, concomitantly with shorter WL times. Even in countries with short waiting times, women are disadvantaged in LT. Policies directed at optimizing the whole LT network should be encouraged to guarantee a fair and equal access of all patients to this life saving resource.

Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia

Objective

To obtain a comprehensive overview of organ donation, organ utilization, and discard in the entire donation process in Colombia.

Methods

A retrospective study of 1 451 possible donors, distributed in three regions of Colombia, evaluated in 2022. The general characteristics, diagnosis, and causes of contraindication for potential donors were described.

Results

Among the 1 451 possible donors, 441 (30.4%) fulfilled brain death criteria, constituting the potential donor pool. Families consented to organ donation in 141 medically suitable cases, while 60 instances utilized legal presumption, leading to 201 eligible donors (13.9%). Of those, 160 (11.0%) were actual donors (in whom operative incision was made with the intent of organ recovery or who had at least one organ recovered). Finally, we identified 147 utilized donors (10.1%) (from whom at least one organ was transplanted). Statistically significant differences were found between age, sex, diagnosis of brain death, and donor critical pathway between regions. A total of 411 organs were transplanted from 147 utilized donors, with kidneys being the most frequently procured and transplanted organs, accounting for 280 (68.1%) of the total. This was followed by 85 livers (20.7%), 31 hearts (7.5%), 14 lungs (3.4%), and 1 pancreas (0.2%). The discard rate of procured deceased donors was 8.1%.

Conclusions

About one-tenth of donors are effectively used for transplantation purposes. Our findings highlight areas of success and challenges, providing a basis for future improvements in Colombia.

Factors influencing deceased organ donation rates in OECD countries: a panel data analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate factors with a significant influence on deceased organ donation rates in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries and determine their relative importance. It seeks to provide the necessary data to facilitate the development of more efficient strategies for improving deceased organ donation rates.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Publicly available secondary annual data.

PARTICIPANTS

The study includes 36 OECD countries as panel members for data analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariable panel data regression analysis was employed, encompassing data from 2010 to 2018 for all investigated variables in the included countries.

RESULTS

The following variables had a significant influence on deceased organ donation rates: 'opt-in' system (β=-4.734, p<0.001, ref: 'opt-out' system), only donation after brain death (DBD) donors allowed (β=-4.049, p=0.002, ref: both DBD and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors allowed), number of hospital beds per million population (pmp) (β=0.002, p<0.001), total healthcare employment pmp (β=-0.00012, p=0.012), World Giving Index (β=0.124, p=0.008), total tax revenue as a percentage of gross domestic product (β=0.312, p=0.009) and percentage of population aged ≥65 years (β=0.801, p<0.001) as well as high education population in percentage (β=0.118, p=0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the promotion of socioeconomic factors with a positive significant impact on deceased organ donation rates, the following policies have been shown to significantly increase rates of deceased organ donation, which could be further actively promoted: the adoption of an 'opt-out' system with presumed consent for deceased organ donation and the legal authorisation of both DBD and DCD for transplantation.

Healthcare System Impact on Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation: A Comparison Between the Top 10 Organ Donor Countries With 4 Countries in Southeast Asia

The need for organ donation is constantly increasing. Some countries have made improvements, while others, such as countries in Southeast Asia (SEA), have some of the lowest rates of deceased donors (pmp). This review aims to compare 14 countries with regards to many variables related to healthcare systems. Countries leading in deceased organ donation spend more on health and education, which is associated with increased potential for deceased organ donation. Out-of-pocket expenditure, is also associated with a decrease in deceased organ donation. Countries in SEA are lacking in healthcare resources such as workforce and materials, which are both necessary for a successful transplant program. Most countries in SEA have an excellent foundation for successful organ donation systems, including proper legislation, government support, and brain death laws along with an overall acceptance of brain death diagnosis. Priorities should include improving coordination, donor identification, and healthcare worker education. Countries in SEA have a lot of potential to increase deceased organ donation, especially by investing in healthcare and education. There is no one size fits all for organ donation programs and countries in SEA should focus on their strengths and take cultural differences into consideration when planning interventions.