All Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys are Equal But are Some More Equal Than Others? A Population-Cohort Analysis of UK Transplant Registry Data

Impact of donor expanded criteria kidney transplantation on clinical outcomes and survival: A single-center experience

INTRODUCTION

The scarcity of suitable donor organs has led to the inclusion of Expanded Criteria Donor (ECD) kidneys to augment the donor pool, despite potential concerns regarding post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the clinical outcomes of a cohort of 317 kidney transplant recipients from deceased donors at a single center between 2008 and 2018. Patients were categorized into ECD and Standard Criteria Donor (SCD) groups, with primary nonfunctioning grafts excluded. Comprehensive laboratory evaluations were conducted, including HLA typing and serum creatinine levels. Immunosuppressive regimens were standardized, and statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS program.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 83 (26.18%) patients who received kidney transplants from ECDs and 234 (73.82%) from SCDs. The ECD group showed a longer cold ischemia time (p = 0.019) and a higher rate of delayed graft function (DGF) compared with the SCD group. No significant differences were observed in graft survival (p = 0.370) or patient survival (p = 0.993) between the ECD and SCD groups. However, differences in graft survival were noted between the groups when stratified by DGF status: ECD with DGF vs. ECD without DGF (p = 0.029), ECD with DGF vs. SCD with DGF (p = 0.188), ECD with DGF vs. SCD without DGF (p = 0.022), ECD without DGF vs. SCD with DGF (p = 0.014), ECD without DGF vs. SCD without DGF (p = 0.340), and SCD with DGF vs. SCD without DGF (p = 0.195). No differences in patient survival rates were observed among these groups for all pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05) when stratified by donor criteria and DGF status.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft and patient survival rates were comparable between ECD and SCD kidney transplant recipients.

The role of neutrophil extracellular trap formation in kidney transplantation: Implications from donors to the recipient

Kidney transplantation remains the gold standard for patients with end-stage renal disease, but severe donor organ shortage has led to long waiting lists. The utilization of expanded criteria donor kidneys within the category of deceased donors has enlarged the pool of available kidneys for transplantation; however, these grafts often have an increased risk for delayed graft function or reduced graft survival following transplantation. During brain or circulatory death, neutrophils are recruited to the vascular beds of kidneys where a proinflammatory microenvironment might prime the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), web-like structures, containing proteolytic enzymes, DNA, and histones. NETs are known to cause tissue damage and specifically endothelial damage while activating other systems such as coagulation and complement, contributing to tissue injury and an unfavorable prognosis in various diseases. In lung transplantation and kidney transplantation studies, NETs have also been associated with primary graft dysfunction or rejection. In this review, the role that NETs might play across the different phases of transplantation, already initiated in the donor, during preservation, and in the recipient, will be discussed. Based on current knowledge, NETs might be a promising therapeutic target to improve graft outcomes.

Current Perspectives on Endourological Ex Vivo Stone Interventions in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review (SR) of literature to assess the existing evidence concerning the success and complications of endourological ex vivo stone surgeries.

METHODS

Eligible studies for inclusion focused on investigating the success and/or complications related to endourological ex vivo surgeries in donors with nephrolithiasis. A SR was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search included databases of Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus and only article in English were included. Studies published between 2002 and 2023 included in this SR.

RESULTS

After screening 1726 abstracts, this SR included 16 studies with a total of 209 patients. The mean stone size was 5.6 mm and majority of kidneys contained single stones, located in the lower calyx. After ex vivo endourological stone surgeries, the average stone-free rate was found to be 95.4%. The mean duration of ex vivo surgery was 17.3 minutes. Regarding intraoperative complications, two patients (1%) experienced mucosal injuries during pneumatic lithotripsy. As for postoperative complications, two patients (1%) experienced vascular complications. In terms of urological complications, hematuria was observed in 24 patients (11.5%), while one patient (0.5%) experienced clot formation in renal pelvis. Seven patients (3.3%) had urinary tract infections, and three patients (1.4%) developed urolithiasis during the follow-up. Additionally, one patient (0.5%) experienced complete occlusion of ureteroneocystostomy and required revision.

CONCLUSION

Given the advancements in current technology and techniques, endourological ex vivo stone surgeries are increasingly recognized as an effective and safe option for donors with nephrolithiasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This systematic review was registered under the protocol registration number CRD42024538384/PROSPERO.

The Use of Kidneys With Lower Longevity From Deceased Donors to Improve Access to Preemptive Renal Transplantation for Elderly Patients: A Qualitative Study

Background

There is a gap between the number of patients waiting for a transplant and the number of kidneys available. Some deceased donor kidneys are currently nonutilized, as medical teams fear that they will experience suboptimal graft survival. However, these organs could provide an acceptable therapeutic option if they were allocated for preemptive kidney transplantation in elderly candidates.

Objective

This project aims to gather patients' perspectives on the allocation of kidneys with lower longevity for preemptive kidney transplantation in elderly patients.

Design

Individual interviews.

Setting

The Center hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) chronic kidney disease (CKD) clinic.

Participants

Patients aged between 64 and 75 years with CKD G4-5 ND, followed at the CHUM and who have not initiated dialysis yet.

Methods

Between March and July 2023, we conducted 14 individual interviews with patients aged between 64 and 75 years who had CKD G4-5 ND and were followed at the CHUM. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted.

Results

Most participants were in favor of using kidneys with lower longevity to increase their access to transplantation, improve their quality of life, enable accelerated transplantation, and avoid dialysis. Patients also wanted to be engaged in the decision-making process, underlining the importance of informed consent. Although the use of kidneys with lower longevity offers the hope of returning to "normal" life, some patients were concerned about the risk of reduced graft survival and the need for a subsequent kidney transplant. In these cases, patients were interested in using mitigation strategies, such as prioritization for kidney transplantation from standard donors in case of early graft loss associated with receiving kidneys with lower longevity. They also recommended the development of a separate waiting list for patients consenting to preemptive transplantation with kidneys with lower longevity.

Limitations

This study was conducted in only 1 nephrology clinic in the province of Quebec with French-speaking patients. Consequently, the results may not be generalizable to other populations, including ethnic minorities.

Conclusion

The use of kidneys with lower longevity for preemptive kidney transplantation appears to be an interesting option for elderly kidney transplant candidates. However, patient information and participation in the decision-making process are essential. Moreover, organ donation organizations and transplant programs should develop a separate waitlist for transplant candidates who have preconsented to receive organ offers of deceased donor kidneys with lower longevity.

Trial registration

Not registered.

Use of a donor kidney with known autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in a highly sensitised paediatric recipient

We report the use of an autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) donor kidney in a paediatric recipient. A 14-year-old boy on haemodialysis for 4 years following loss of a first kidney transplant, highly sensitised, and with limited vascular options for ongoing dialysis access, was offered a deceased brain death donor transplant from a mid-30s donor with known ADPKD but normal kidney function and negligible proteinuria. After extensive discussion with the patient and family, discussing all alternative options and review of available literature, the kidney was accepted and implanted. Graft function was immediate. An early post-transplant creatinine rise was attributed to possible antibody-mediated rejection, treated with plasmapheresis and rituximab. Ten months post-transplant, the patient remains dialysis-free with stable function. Extended criteria kidneys are already considered for highly sensitised or long-waiting dialysis patients. Though the literature is limited, kidneys from patients with ADPKD could be considered within extended criteria offers on a case-by-case basis.