1
|
Katwal S, Singh Y, Bedi JS, Chandra M, Honparkhe M. Microbial dynamics and climatic interactions in pig sheds: Insights into airborne microbes and particulate matter concentrations. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2024; 196:511. [PMID: 38703303 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-12624-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Emissions of airborne pollutants from livestock buildings affect indoor air quality, the health and well-being of farmers, animals and the environment. This study aimed to evaluate the microbial count within pig sheds and its relationship with meteorological variables (temperature, relative humidity and air velocity) and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and microbial diversity. Sampling was conducted both inside and outside of two pig sheds over three seasons (summer, rainy and winter), with regular monitoring at fortnightly intervals. Results showed that the bacterial and fungal counts ranged from 0.07 to 3.98 x 103 cfu/m3 inside the sheds and 0.01 to 1.82 x 103 cfu/m3 outside. Seasonal variations were observed, with higher concentrations of particulate matter detected during the winter season, followed by summer. Climatic variables such as temperature, air velocity and relative humidity demonstrated significant impacts on the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae and fungi, while air velocity specifically influenced the presence of mesophilic bacteria and staphylococci. Importantly, no significant disparities were found between microbial counts and particulate matter levels. Staphylococcaceae emerged as the predominant bacterial family, while Aspergillus and Cladosporium spp. were the dominant fungal species within the pig sheds. The average levels of airborne bacteria and fungi in pig sheds were found to be within the recommended range, which can be attributed to the loose housing design and lower animal population on the farms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarishti Katwal
- Department of Livestock Production Management, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
| | - Yashpal Singh
- Department of Livestock Production Management, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Jasbir Singh Bedi
- Centre for One Health, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Mudit Chandra
- Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| | - Mrigank Honparkhe
- Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Z, Wang Y, Zheng W, Wang H, Li B, Liu C, Wang Y, Lei C. Effect of inlet-outlet configurations on the cross-transmission of airborne bacteria between animal production buildings. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2022; 429:128372. [PMID: 35236040 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Cross-transmission of airborne pathogens between buildings facilitates the spread of both human and animal diseases. Rational spatial arrangement of buildings and air inlet-outlet design are well-established preventive measures, but the effectiveness of current configurations for mitigating pathogens cross-transmission is still under assessment. An intensive field study in a laying hen farm was conducted to elucidate the spatial distribution of airborne bacteria (AB) and the source of AB at the inlets under different wind regimes. We found higher concentrations of AB at the interspace and sidewall inlets of buildings with sidewall exhaust systems than at those with endwall exhaust systems. We observed significant differences in bacterial diversity and richness at the interspace and sidewall inlets between buildings with side exhaust systems and those with endwall exhaust systems. We further found that the AB emitted from buildings could translocate to the sidewall inlets of adjacent building to a greater extent between buildings with sidewall exhaust systems than between those with endwall exhaust systems. Our findings revealed that sidewall exhaust systems aggravate cross-transmission of AB between buildings, suggesting that endwall exhaust systems or other compensatory preventive measures combined with sidewall exhaust systems could be a better choice to suppress airborne cross-transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zonggang Li
- College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center on Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Detection Technology for Animal-Derived Food Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Weichao Zheng
- College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center on Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing, China.
| | - Hongning Wang
- College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China; Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Sichuan, China
| | - Baoming Li
- College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center on Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Liu
- College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center on Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxin Wang
- College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Agricultural Engineering in Structure and Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China; Beijing Engineering Research Center on Animal Healthy Environment, Beijing, China
| | - Changwei Lei
- College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China; Key Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martínez-Álvarez S, Sanz S, Olarte C, Hidalgo-Sanz R, Carvalho I, Fernández-Fernández R, Campaña-Burguet A, Latorre-Fernández J, Zarazaga M, Torres C. Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli from the Broiler Farm Environment, with Detection of SHV-12-Producing Isolates. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11040444. [PMID: 35453196 PMCID: PMC9024766 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11040444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is an important One Health challenge that encompasses the human, animal, and environmental fields. A total of 111 Escherichia coli isolates previously recovered from manure (n = 57) and indoor air (n = 54) samples from a broiler farm were analyzed to determine their phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance and integron characterization; in addition, plasmid replicon analysis and molecular typing were performed in extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) producer isolates. A multidrug-resistance phenotype was detected in 46.8% of the isolates, and the highest rates of resistance were found for ampicillin, trimethoprim−sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (>40%); moreover, 15 isolates (13.5%) showed susceptibility to all tested antibiotics. None of the isolates showed imipenem and/or cefoxitin resistance. Twenty-three of the one hundred and eleven E. coli isolates (20.7%) were ESBL producers and carried the blaSHV-12 gene; one of these isolates was recovered from the air, and the remaining 22 were from manure samples. Most of ESBL-positive isolates carried the cmlA (n = 23), tet(A) (n = 19), and aac(6′)-Ib-cr (n = 11) genes. The following genetic lineages were identified among the ESBL-producing isolates (sequence type-phylogroup-clonotype): ST770-E-CH116−552 (n = 12), ST117-B2-CH45−97 (n = 4), ST68-E-CH26−382/49 (n = 3), ST68-E-CH26−49 (n = 1), and ST10992-A/B1-CH11−23/41/580 (n = 4); the latter two were detected for the first time in the poultry sector. At least two plasmid replicon types were detected in the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, with IncF, IncF1B, IncK, and IncHI1 being the most frequently found. The following antimicrobial resistance genes were identified among the non-ESBL-producing isolates (number of isolates): blaTEM (58), aac(6′)-Ib-cr (6), qnrS (2), aac(3)-II (2), cmlA (6), tet(A)/tet(B) (22), and sul1/2/3 (51). Four different gene-cassette arrays were detected in the variable region of class 1 (dfrA1-aadA1, dfrA12-aadA2, and dfrA12-orf-aadA2-cmlA) and class 2 integrons (sat2-aadA1-orfX). This work reveals the worrying presence of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli in the broiler farm environment, with ESBL-producing isolates of SHV-12 type being extensively disseminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Martínez-Álvarez
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Susana Sanz
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Carmen Olarte
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Raquel Hidalgo-Sanz
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Isabel Carvalho
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes-and Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Rosa Fernández-Fernández
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Allelen Campaña-Burguet
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Javier Latorre-Fernández
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Myriam Zarazaga
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
| | - Carmen Torres
- Department of Agriculture and Food, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain; (S.M.-Á.); (S.S.); (C.O.); (R.H.-S.); (I.C.); (R.F.-F.); (A.C.-B.); (J.L.-F.); (M.Z.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Lameness or leg weakness is the main cause of poor poultry welfare and serious economic losses in meat-type poultry production worldwide. Disorders related to the legs are often associated with multifactorial aetiology which makes diagnosis and proper treatment difficult. Among the infectious agents, bacteria of genus Staphylococcus are one of the most common causes of bone infections in poultry and are some of the oldest bacterial infections described in poultry. Staphylococci readily infect bones and joints and are associated with bacterial chondronecrosis with osteomyelitis (BCO), spondylitis, arthritis, tendinitis, tenosynovitis, osteomyelitis, turkey osteomyelitis complex (TOC), bumblefoot, dyschondroplasia with osteomyelitis and amyloid arthropathy. Overall, 61 staphylococcal species have been described so far, and 56% of them (34/61) have been isolated from clinical cases in poultry. Although Staphylococcus aureus is the principal cause of poultry staphylococcosis, other Staphylococcus species, such as S. agnetis, S. cohnii, S. epidermidis, S. hyicus, S. simulans, have also been isolated from skeletal lesions. Antimicrobial treatment of staphylococcosis is usually ineffective due to the location and type of lesion, as well as the possible occurrence of multidrug-resistant strains. Increasing demand for antibiotic-free farming has contributed to the use of alternatives to antibiotics. Other prevention methods, such as better management strategies, early feed restriction or use of slow growing broilers should be implemented to avoid rapid growth rate, which is associated with locomotor problems. This review aims to summarise and address current knowledge on skeletal disorders associated with Staphylococcus spp. infection in poultry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustaw M Szafraniec
- Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Szeleszczuk
- Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Beata Dolka
- Department of Pathology and Veterinary Diagnostics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Survival of Escherichia coli in Airborne and Settled Poultry Litter Particles. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12030284. [PMID: 35158607 PMCID: PMC8833766 DOI: 10.3390/ani12030284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Airborne Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the poultry environment can migrate inside and outside houses through air movement. The airborne E. coli, after settling on surfaces, could be re-aerosolized or picked up by vectors (e.g., caretakers, rodents, transport trucks) for further transmission. To assess the impacts of airborne E. coli transmission among poultry farms, understanding the survivability of the bacteria is necessary. The objective of this study is to determine the survivability of airborne E. coli, settled E. coli, and E. coli in poultry litter under laboratory environmental conditions (22–28 °C with relative humidity of 54–63%). To determine the survivability of airborne E. coli, an AGI-30 bioaerosol sampler (AGI-30) was used to collect the E. coli at 0 and 20 min after the aerosolization. The half-life time of airborne E. coli was then determined by comparing the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of the two samplings. To determine the survivability of settled E. coli, four sterile Petri dishes were placed on the chamber floor right after the aerosolization to collect settled E. coli. The Petri dishes were then divided into two groups, with each group being quantified for culturable E. coli concentrations and dust particle weight at 24-h intervals. The survivability of settled E. coli was then determined by comparing the number of viable E. coli per milligram settled dust collected in the Petri dishes in the two groups. The survivability of E. coli in the poultry litter sample (for aerosolization) was also determined. Results show that the half-life time of airborne E. coli was 5.7 ± 1.2 min. The survivability of E. coli in poultry litter and settled E. coli were much longer with the half-life time of 15.9 ± 1.3 h and 9.6 ± 1.6 h, respectively. In addition, the size distribution of airborne E. coli attached to dust particles and the size distribution of airborne dust particles were measured by using an Andersen impactor and a dust concentration monitor (DustTrak). Results show that most airborne E. coli (98.89% of total E. coli) were carried by the dust particles with aerodynamic diameter larger than 2.1 µm. The findings of this study may help better understand the fate of E. coli transmitted through the air and settled on surfaces and evaluate the impact of airborne transmission in poultry production.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bai H, He LY, Wu DL, Gao FZ, Zhang M, Zou HY, Yao MS, Ying GG. Spread of airborne antibiotic resistance from animal farms to the environment: Dispersal pattern and exposure risk. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 158:106927. [PMID: 34673316 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Animal farms have been considered as the critical reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB). Spread of antibiotic resistance from animal farms to the surrounding environments via aerosols has become a growing concern. Here we investigated the dispersal pattern and exposure risk of airborne ARGs (especially in zoonotic pathogens) in the environment of chicken and dairy farms. Aerosol, dust and animal feces samples were collected from the livestock houses and surrounding environments (upwind and downwind areas) for assessing ARG profiles. Antibiotic resistance phenotype and genotype of airborne Staphylococcus spp. was especially analyzed to reveal the exposure risk of airborne ARGs. Results showed that airborne ARGs were detected from upwind (50 m/100 m) and downwind (50 m/100 m/150 m) air environment, wherein at least 30% of bacterial taxa dispersed from the animal houses. Moreover, atmospheric dispersion modeling showed that airborne ARGs can disperse from the animal houses to a distance of 10 km along the wind direction. Clinically important pathogens were identified in airborne culturable bacteria. Genus of Staphylococcus, Sphingomonas and Acinetobacter were potential bacterial host of airborne ARGs. Airborne Staphylococcus spp. were isolated from the environment of chicken farm (n = 148) and dairy farm (n = 87). It is notable that all isolates from chicken-related environment were multidrug-resistance (>3 clinical-relevant antibiotics), with more than 80% of them carrying methicillin resistance gene (mecA) and associated ARGs and MGEs. Presence of numerous ARGs and diverse pathogens in dust from animal houses and the downwind residential areas indicated the accumulation of animal feces origin ARGs in bioaerosols. Employees and local residents in the chick farming environment are exposed to chicken originated ARGs and multidrug resistant Staphylococcus spp. via inhalation. This study highlights the potential exposure risks of airborne ARGs and antibiotic resistant pathogens to human health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Bai
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Liang-Ying He
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China.
| | - Dai-Ling Wu
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China; Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Fang-Zhou Gao
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Min Zhang
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Hai-Yan Zou
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Mao-Sheng Yao
- State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Guang-Guo Ying
- SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China; School of Environment, South China Normal University, University Town, Guangzhou 510006, China.
| |
Collapse
|