Evaluation of a Water-Based Medium-Expansion Foam Depopulation Method in Suckling and Finisher Pigs

Swine industry stakeholders' perception on the use of water-based foam as an emergency mass depopulation method

The U.S. pork supply chain is vulnerable to various internal and external threats and in need of prompt, comprehensive response plans. Under urgent circumstances, for example in the case of foreign disease incursions, swine farms will have to perform on-farm animal depopulation to prevent disease spread. Several animal depopulation methods including water-based foam (WBF) have been proposed and are under evaluation for feasibility in the field. However, the psychological/emotional impacts of applying depopulation methods for personnel managing and carrying on the tasks are not currently well understood. Thus, this study aimed to investigate WBF as an alternative for depopulation compared to existing methods approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Swine industry stakeholders were invited to voluntarily observe a WBF depopulation trial and to provide their self-reported perspectives before and after the observation. A survey was designed to explore key areas on expected and perceived method effectiveness, efficiency, and animal welfare considerations, as well as to evaluate short-term post-observation psychological impacts. Among 42 recruited stakeholders, 31.0% (13/42) were educators/researchers followed by animal health officials (26.2%, 11/42) and veterinarians (23.8%, 10/42), with an average of 11.7 ± 12.6 (n = 39) years of work experience. After the trial, respondents' positive perception of WBF depopulation increased specifically regarding the animal loading process being less stressful than restrained in-barn depopulation options (P = 0.003) and by the observation of fewer swine escape attempts and vocalizations than expected (P < 0.001). Respondents' positive perception of WBF also increased regarding to the time required to fill the trailer with foam, to stop hearing animal vocalization, and stop hearing animal movement, as the observed trial times were faster than their pre-observation estimates (P < 0.001). Additionally, 79.5% (31/39) of respondents agreed that the rapid destruction of animal populations had priority over animal welfare under urgent scenarios. Minor post-traumatic stress disorder-like (PTSD-like) symptoms from the observed trials were reported (26.7%, 4/15 respondents) one month after the observation. This study showed that the WBF depopulation process was perceived positively by swine stakeholders and may have limited short-term psychological impacts on personnel involved in animal depopulation.

Refinement of water-based foam depopulation procedures for finisher pigs during field conditions: Welfare implications and logistical aspects

Water-based foam (WBF) depopulation is currently being researched as an alternative for rapid destruction of swine populations under emergency circumstances. Appropriate guidelines are needed to maintain method reliability and depopulation efficacy while minimizing animal distress under field conditions. Finisher pigs were depopulated using WBF with a 7.5-minute dwell time in two trials to evaluate the effect of; trial 1) foam fill level (1.5, 1.75, or 2.0 times the pig's head height) and trial 2) foam fill rate (slow, medium, or fast) on aversive pig responses (surface breaks, vocalization, and escape attempts) and time to cessation of cardiac activity. Activity and cardiac activity were recorded using subcutaneous bio-loggers for swine in trial 2. The average time to cessation of movement (COM) from the start of foam filling was compared for the foam fill rate groups using a generalized linear mixed effect model under Poisson distribution. Foam rate group was used as an independent variable, and replicates as a random effect. For trial 1, the average (mm:ss ± SD) time to fill completion was 01:18 ± 00:00, 00:47 ± 00:05, and 00:54 ± 00:05, for 1.5, 1.75, and 2.0 times the pig's head height, respectively. For trial 2, the average time to fill completion was 03:57 ± 00:32, 01:14 ± 00:23 and 00:44 ± 00:03, and the average time (mm:ss ± SE) to COM was 05:22 ± 00:21, 03:32 ± 00:14, and 03:11 ± 00:13 for slow, medium, and fast fill rate groups, respectively. A higher number of aversive pig responses were observed for the lowest foam fill level and slowest foam fill rate compared to increased fill levels and faster fill rates. For trial 2 the median (mm:ss ± IQR) time to fatal arrhythmia was 09:53 ± 02:48, 11:19 ± 04:04, and 10:57 ± 00:47 post-foam initiation for fast, medium, and slow foam rate groups, respectively. Time to cessation of cardiac activity was significantly shorter for the fast foam rate group compared to medium and slow foam rates groups (P = 0.04). For both trials, vocalizations were absent, and all pigs were unconscious following the 7.5-minute dwell time and no pigs needed a secondary euthanasia method. This WBF study showed that slower fill rates and low foam fill levels may extend the time until cessation of cardiac activity in swine during depopulation. A conservative recommendation with consideration of swine welfare during an emergency scenario would be a minimum foam fill level twice the pig's head height and a foam fill rate capable of covering pigs in foam within 60 s to minimize aversive responses and expedite cessation of cardiac activity.

Water-based medium-expansion foam depopulation of adult cattle

Current options for depopulation of adult cattle are limited, have logistic constraints, and may not be practical on a large scale. Aspirated water-based foam (WBF) has been shown to be successful in depopulating poultry and swine but has yet to be tested in cattle. WBF is advantageous because necessary equipment can be readily available, easy to use, and presents minimal personnel risk. With the use of a modified rendering trailer in a field setting, we evaluated the efficacy of aspirated WBF for depopulation of adult cattle. Water-based medium-expansion foam was added to the trailer holding cattle to a depth of approximately 50 cm greater than head height. The study was conducted as a gated design and the initial trial was conducted using six anesthetized and six conscious animals for verification of the process and followed by four replicates each containing 18 conscious cattle. A total of 84 cattle were used, with a subset (n = 52) implanted with subcutaneous bio-loggers that recorded activity and electrocardiograms. Cattle were loaded onto the trailer and three gasoline-powered water pumps delivered foam into the trailer followed by a 15-min foam dwell period. Average (± SD) time to completely fill the trailer with foam was 84.8 ± 11.0 s. No animal vocalizations were heard during foam application or the dwell period, and all cattle were confirmed dead upon removal from the trailer after 15 min of immersion. Necropsies of a subset of cattle revealed foam extending to at least the tracheal bifurcation in all cattle and distal to this level in 67% (8/12) animals. Time to cessation of movement, which served as a proxy for loss of consciousness, was 2.5 ± 1.3 min and time to cardiac death was 8.5 ± 2.5 min as determined by data from animals carrying subcutaneous bio-loggers. The results of this study indicate that WBF is a rapid and effective method for depopulation of adult cattle with potential advantages in speed and carcass handling and disposal over current methods.

The Rise of Heatstroke as a Method of Depopulating Pigs and Poultry: Implications for the US Veterinary Profession

Depopulation of food-producing animals is becoming increasingly common in response to both disease outbreaks and supply chain disruptions. In 2019, the American Veterinary Medical Association released depopulation guidelines classifying certain heatstroke-based killing methods as "permitted in constrained circumstances", when circumstances of the emergency constrain reasonable implementation of "preferred" methods. Since then, tens of millions of birds and pigs have been killed by such methods, termed ventilation shutdown (VSD) Plus Heat and VSD Plus High Temperature and Humidity. While no research using validated measures of animal welfare assessment has been performed on these methods, their pathophysiology suggests that animals are likely to experience pain, anxiety, nausea, and heat distress prior to loss of consciousness. Heatstroke-based methods may result in prolonged suffering and often do not achieve 100% mortality. Potential and available alternative depopulation methods are briefly reviewed. The veterinary profession's ethical obligation to protect animal welfare in the context of depopulations is discussed.

Description of electroencephalographic data gathered using water-based medium-expansion foam as a depopulation method for nursery pigs

The United States' swine industry is under constant threat of foreign animal diseases, which may emerge without warning due to the globalized transportation networks moving people, animals, and products. Therefore, having disease control and elimination protocols in place prior to pathogen introduction is paramount for business continuity and economic recovery. During extraordinary circumstances, it may become necessary to depopulate large populations of animals, including swine, as a disease containment measure. Currently approved depopulation methods for swine present significant logistical challenges when scaled to large populations or performed in field conditions. In the United States, water-based foam is currently approved for poultry depopulation, and recent field studies demonstrate water-based foam is an effective depopulation alternative for swine. While effective, the speed at which water-based foam induces loss of consciousness prior to death, a major welfare consideration, has not been adequately investigated. In this study, 12 nursery pigs were terminated using water-based medium-expansion foam to quantify the time to induce loss of consciousness and ultimately brain death. Each pig was implanted with subdermal electrodes to capture electroencephalographic data, placed in a body sling, and suspended in a plastic bulk container that was subsequently filled with water-based foam. Electroencephalographic data was recorded for 15 min, during which the pigs remained immersed in the water-based foam. Conservatively, average (± SD) time to unconsciousness and brain death was 1 min, 53 s ± 36 s and 3 min, 3 s ± 56 s, respectively. The relatively rapid loss of consciousness compared to other methods limits the amount of distress and is overall a positive finding for the welfare of the pigs that might be depopulated with water-based foam. The findings of this study add additional evidence supporting the use of water-based medium-expansion foam for an emergency depopulation of swine.