Determining the Provenance of Traded Wildlife in the Philippines

Wildlife trade investigations benefit from multivariate stable isotope analyses

The investigation of wildlife trade and crime has benefitted from advances in technology and scientific development in a variety of fields. Stable isotope analysis (SIA) represents one rapidly developing approach that has considerable potential to contribute to wildlife trade investigation, especially in complementing other methods including morphological, genetic, and elemental approaches. Here, we review recent progress in the application of SIA in wildlife trade research to highlight strengths, shortcomings, and areas for development in the future. SIA has shown success in species identification, determination of geographic provenance, and differentiating between captive-bred and wild individuals. There are also emerging applications of SIA in wildlife trade research including the use of labelling for traceability, more in-depth analyses such as compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA), the use of trace metal isotopes, and monitoring the health of individuals (e.g. dietary history and nutritional status). While these applications have shown the utility of SIA in wildlife trade investigations, there are a number of limitations and issues where standardisation of analytical procedures would improve the comparability and interpretation of results. First, there is high variation within many stable isotopes geographically and within tissues - this variation presents opportunities for tracking and monitoring but can also challenge detection of patterns when variation is high. Second, the choice of isotopes and tissues within an organism (and ideally, multiple isotopes and tissues) should be considered carefully as different isotopes and tissue types have variable strengths and weaknesses depending on the research question. Third, validation of SIA methods remains underutilised in the field but is critical for applying SIA broadly to wildlife trade investigations and, particularly, for applications in forensics and in court. Fourth, standards are essential for comparisons across studies. Fifth, while some reference databases exist for the use of SIA in wildlife trade research (e.g. ivory), there are still few comprehensive reference databases available. Development of robust reference databases should be a priority for advancing the use of SIA in wildlife trade research, and ecological study more broadly. Ultimately, further recognition of these primary challenges (and development of solutions) within wildlife SIA research will improve the potential for this technique in tackling the threat of overexploitation to global biodiversity - particularly in concert with the application of other investigative techniques such as genetics and elemental analysis.