1
|
Ylhäinen A, Mölsä S, Thomson K, Laitinen-Vapaavuori O, Rantala M, Grönthal T. Bacteria associated with canine pyometra and concurrent bacteriuria: A prospective study. Vet Microbiol 2024; 301:110362. [PMID: 39778300 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
Canine pyometra is a common and potentially life-threatening reproductive disorder in intact female dogs. This prospective study aimed to (1) investigate the bacterial spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from the uterus and urine of dogs with pyometra, (2) assess the clonal relatedness and virulence factors of Escherichia coli isolates from individual dogs, and (3) determine the occurrence of concurrent and persistent bacteriuria or clinical urinary tract infections. Bacterial isolates from 208 uterine and 203 urine specimens collected during pyometra surgery were analyzed. Additionally, follow-up urine specimens were collected from 56 dogs with perioperative bacteriuria. Bacterial growth was detected in 87 % (180/208) of uterine specimens, while concurrent bacteriuria was observed in 33 % (67/203) of cases. In one-third (18/56) of these dogs the bacteriuria persisted, being primarily (15/18) asymptomatic. E. coli was the most common isolate in both uterine (71 %) and urine (81 %) specimens. Notably, altogether 32 distinct bacterial species were identified, with mixed growth in 15 % of the specimens. The vast majority of isolates were largely susceptible to tested antimicrobials. Identification of bacterial species was performed using MALDI-ToF MS, and antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by disk diffusion. Whole-genome sequencing of 45 E. coli strains from fifteen dogs indicated high genetic similarities within individual dogs, supporting a clonal relationship. In conclusion, canine uteri with pyometra contained a plethora of bacterial species, predominantly E. coli, and antimicrobial resistance was rare. Concurrent and persistent E. coli bacteriuria was commonly caused by the same clone as found in the uterus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ylhäinen
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57 (Viikintie 49), Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
| | - Sari Mölsä
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57 (Viikintie 49), Helsinki FI-00014, Finland
| | - Katariina Thomson
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57 (Viikintie 49), Helsinki FI-00014, Finland; Evidensia Eläinlääkäripalvelut Oy, Tammiston Kauppatie 29, Vantaa FI-01510, Finland
| | - Outi Laitinen-Vapaavuori
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57 (Viikintie 49), Helsinki FI-00014, Finland
| | - Merja Rantala
- Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57 (Viikintie 49), Helsinki FI-00014, Finland
| | - Thomas Grönthal
- Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57 (Viikintie 49), Helsinki FI-00014, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sørensen TM, Scahill K, Ruperez JE, Olejnik M, Swinbourne F, Verwilghen DR, Nolff MC, Baines S, Marques C, Vilen A, Duarte EL, Dias M, Dewulf S, Wichtowska A, Valencia AC, Pelligand L, Broens EM, Toutain PL, Alishani M, Brennan ML, Weese JS, Jessen LR, Allerton F. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in companion animal surgery: A scoping review for European Network for Optimization of Antimicrobial Therapy (ENOVAT) guidelines. Vet J 2024; 304:106101. [PMID: 38490359 DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is widely used to reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI), but there is uncertainty as to what the proportion of SSI reduction is. Therefore, it is difficult for surgeons to properly weigh the costs, risks and benefits for individual patients when deciding on the use of SAP, making it challenging to promote antimicrobial stewardship in primary practice settings. The objective of this study was to map the veterinary evidence focused on assessing the effect of SAP on SSI development and in order to identify surgical procedures with some research evidence and possible knowledge gaps. In October 2021 and December 2022, Scopus, CAB Abstracts, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase and MEDLINE were systematically searched. Double blinded screening of records was performed to identify studies in companion animals that reported on the use of SAP and SSI rates. Comparative data were available from 34 out of 39123 records screened including: eight randomised controlled trials (RCT), 23 cohort studies (seven prospective and 16 retrospective) and three retrospective case series representing 12476 dogs and cats in total. Extracted data described peri- or post-operative SAP in nine, and 25 studies, respectively. In the eight RCTs evaluating SAP in companion animals, surgical procedure coverage was skewed towards orthopaedic stifle surgeries in referral settings and there was large variation in SAP protocols, SSI definitions and follow-up periods. More standardized data collection and agreement of SSI definitions is needed to build stronger evidence for optimized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T M Sørensen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 16, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland.
| | - K Scahill
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom; Evidensia Södra Djursjukhuset Kungens Kurva, Månskärarvägen 13, Kungens Kurva 14175, Sweden; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - J Espinel Ruperez
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Perth, WA 6150, Australia
| | - M Olejnik
- Department of Fundamental and Preclinical Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurija Gagarina 11, Toruń 87-100, Poland
| | - F Swinbourne
- Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Selborne Rd, Alton GU34 3HL, United Kingdom
| | - D R Verwilghen
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney, Regimental Dr, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - M C Nolff
- Clinic for Small Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty, University Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 260, TFA 01.51, Zürich 8057, Switzerland
| | - S Baines
- Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, Solihull B90 4NH, United Kingdom
| | - C Marques
- Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, Lisboa 1749-024, Portugal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Animal Health (CIISA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - A Vilen
- AniCura Landskrona Smådjursklinik, Föreningsgatan 165, Landskrona 261 51, Sweden
| | - E L Duarte
- Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra Apartado 94, Évora 7006-554, Portugal; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Dias
- Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra Apartado 94, Évora 7006-554, Portugal
| | - S Dewulf
- Veterinary Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Gebouw D4, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke, Ghent 9820, Belgium
| | - A Wichtowska
- Department of Fundamental and Preclinical Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurija Gagarina 11, Toruń 87-100, Poland
| | - A Carranza Valencia
- Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, Bern University, Länggassstrasse 120, Bern 3012, Switzerland
| | - L Pelligand
- Dept. Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, 4 Royal College St, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - E M Broens
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, Utrecht 3584 CL, the Netherlands; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - P L Toutain
- Dept. Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, 4 Royal College St, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom; INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 23 Chem. des Capelles Entrée n°1, Toulouse 31300, France
| | - M Alishani
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture and Veterinary, University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina", Prishtina 10 000, Kosovo
| | - M L Brennan
- Centre for Evidence-based Veterinary Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - J S Weese
- Dept of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 419 Gordon St, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - L R Jessen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Dyrlaegevej 16, Frederiksberg C 1870, Denmark; ESCMID Study Group for Veterinary Microbiology (ESGVM), Basel, Switzerland
| | - F Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, Solihull B90 4NH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|