Interspecies Scaling of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC) for the Prediction of Human Clearance

Ulgen K. Advances in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Nanomaterials

Nanoparticles (NPs) have been widely used to improve the pharmacokinetic properties and tissue distribution of small molecules such as targeting to a specific tissue of interest, enhancing their systemic circulation, and enlarging their therapeutic properties. NPs have unique and complicated in vivo disposition properties compared to small molecule drugs due to their complex multifunctionality. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has been a powerful tool in the simulation of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) characteristics of the materials, and it can be used in the characterization and prediction of the systemic disposition, toxicity, efficacy, and target exposure of various types of nanoparticles. In this review, recent advances in PBPK model applications related to the nanoparticles with unique properties, and dispositional features in the biological systems, ADME characteristics, the description of transport processes of nanoparticles in the PBPK model, and the challenges in PBPK model development of nanoparticles are delineated and juxtaposed with those encountered in small molecule models. Nanoparticle related, non-nanoparticle-related, and interspecies-scaling methods applied in PBPK modeling are reviewed. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) methods being a promising computational tool to provide in vivo predictions from the results of in vitro and in silico studies are discussed. Finally, as a recent advancement ML/AI-based approaches and challenges in PBPK modeling in the estimation of ADME parameters and pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis results are introduced.

Determining tissue distribution of the oral antileishmanial agent miltefosine: a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach

Miltefosine (MTS) is the only approved oral drug for treating leishmaniasis caused by intracellular Leishmania parasites that localize in macrophages of the liver, spleen, skin, bone marrow, and lymph nodes. MTS is extensively distributed in tissues and has prolonged elimination half-lives due to its high plasma protein binding, slow metabolic clearance, and minimal urinary excretion. Thus, understanding and predicting the tissue distribution of MTS help assess therapeutic and toxicologic outcomes of MTS, especially in special populations, e.g., pediatrics. In this study, a whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of MTS was built on mice and extrapolated to rats and humans. MTS plasma and tissue concentration data obtained by intravenous and oral administration to mice were fitted simultaneously to estimate model parameters. The resulting high tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient values corroborate extensive distribution in all major organs except the bone marrow. Sensitivity analysis suggests that plasma exposure is most susceptible to changes in fraction unbound in plasma. The murine oral-PBPK model was further validated by assessing overlay of simulations with plasma and tissue profiles obtained from an independent study. Subsequently, the murine PBPK model was extrapolated to rats and humans based on species-specific physiological and drug-related parameters, as well as allometrically scaled parameters. Fold errors for pharmacokinetic parameters were within acceptable range in both extrapolated models, except for a slight underprediction in the human plasma exposure. These animal and human PBPK models are expected to provide reliable estimates of MTS tissue distribution and assist dose regimen optimization in special populations.

Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibody testing by indirect immunofluorescence or solid-phase assays in a Spanish population: the Camargo Cohort

Autoantibodies are the hallmark of autoimmunity, and specifically, antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are one of the most relevant antibodies present in systemic autoimmune diseases (AID). In the present study, we evaluate the relationship between ANA and sociodemographic and biobehavioral factors in a population with a low pre-test probability for systemic AID. ANA were determined in serum samples at baseline visit from 2997 participants from the Camargo Cohort using indirect immunofluorescence assay, and two solid phase assays (SPA), addressable laser bead immunoassay, and fluorescence enzyme immunoassay. Sociodemographic and biobehavioral features of the subjects were obtained at baseline visit using a structured questionnaire. The prevalence of ANA positive results was significantly higher when indirect immunofluorescence assay was used as screening method in comparison with SPAs, being higher in females, older subjects, and those with higher C-reactive protein levels. Considering biobehavioral features, the prevalence was higher in those individuals with a sedentary lifestyle, and in ex- and non-alcohol users. Moreover, considering the relevance of the antibody load using ANA Screen, the prevalence of the antibody load also increased with age, especially in females. In conclusion, the prevalence of ANA varies depending on sociodemographic and biobehavioral features of the subjects, which could be relevant specifically in a population with a low pre-test probability for systemic AIDs.

A Simple Method for the Prediction of Human Concentration-Time Profiles and Pharmacokinetics of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC) from Rats or Monkeys

Knowledge of human concentration-time profiles from animal data can be useful during early drug development. The objective of this study is to predict human concentration-time profiles of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and subsequently predict pharmacokinetic parameters in humans from rats or monkeys. Eight methods with different exponents of volume of distribution (0.8-1) as well as exponents of clearance (0.85), along with the exponents of volume of distribution for 5 ADCs, were used to predict human concentration-time profiles. The PK parameters were also scaled to humans from monkeys or rats using fixed exponents and compared with the PK parameters predicted from predicted human concentration-time profiles. The results of the study indicated that the exponent 0.9 and the combination of exponents of 0.9 and 0.8 (two exponents, 0.8 and 0.9, were used) were the best method to predict human concentration-time profiles and, subsequently, human PK parameters. The predicted PK parameters from fixed exponents were comparable with the predicted PK parameters estimated from human concentration-time profiles. The proposed methods are applicable to rats or monkeys with the same degree of accuracy. Overall, the proposed methods are robust, accurate, and cost- and time-effective.

Characterizing the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of therapeutic proteins: an industry white paper

Characterization of the pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution of therapeutic proteins (TPs) is a hot topic within the pharmaceutical industry, particularly with an ever-increasing catalog of novel modality TPs. Here, we review the current practices, and provide a summary of extensive cross-company discussions as well as a survey completed by International Consortium for Innovation and Quality (IQ consortium) members on this theme. A wide variety of in vitro, in vivo and in silico techniques are currently used to assess PK and biodistribution of TPs, and we discuss the relevance of these from an industry perspective, focusing on PK/PD understanding at the preclinical stage of development, and translation to human. We consider that the 'traditional in vivo biodistribution study' is becoming insufficient as a standalone tool, and thorough characterization of the interaction of the TP with its target(s), target biology, and off-target interactions at a microscopic scale are key to understand the overall biodistribution at a full-body scale. Our summary of the current challenges and our recommendations to address these issues could provide insight into the implementation of best practices in this area of drug development, and continued cross-company collaboration will be of tremendous value. Significance Statement The Innovation & Quality Consortium (IQ) Translational and ADME Sciences Leadership Group (TALG) working group for the ADME of therapeutic proteins evaluates the current practices, recent advances, and challenges in characterizing the PK and biodistribution of therapeutic proteins during drug development, and proposes recommendations to address these issues. Incorporating the in vitro, in vivo and in silico approaches discussed herein may provide a pragmatic framework to increase early understanding of PK/PD relationships, and aid translational modelling for first-in-human dose predictions.

Clinical Pharmacology of Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are biopharmaceutical products where a monoclonal antibody is linked to a biologically active drug (a small molecule) forming a conjugate. Since the approval of first ADC (Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (trade name: Mylotarg)) for the treatment of CD33-positive acute myelogenous leukemia, several ADCs have been developed for the treatment of cancer. The goal of an ADC as a cancer agent is to release the cytotoxic drug to kill the tumor cells without harming the normal or healthy cells. With time, it is being realized that ADCS can also be used to manage or cure other diseases such as inflammatory diseases, atherosclerosis, and bacteremia and some research in this direction is ongoing. The focus of this review is on the clinical pharmacology aspects of ADC development. From the selection of an appropriate antibody to the finished product, the entire process of the development of an ADC is a difficult and challenging task. Clinical pharmacology is one of the most important tools of drug development since this tool helps in finding the optimum dose of a product, thus preserving the safety and efficacy of the product in a patient population. Unlike other small or large molecules where only one moiety and/or metabolite(s) is generally measured for the pharmacokinetic profiling, there are several moieties that need to be measured for characterizing the PK profiles of an ADC. Therefore, knowledge and understanding of clinical pharmacology of ADCs is vital for the selection of a safe and efficacious dose in a patient population.