Levofloxacin Versus Ciprofloxacin-Based Prophylaxis during the Pre-Engraftment Phase in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Pediatric Recipients: A Single-Center Retrospective Matched Analysis

Ciprofloxacin Versus Levofloxacin Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess whether there is a difference between ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin as prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized trial in patients receiving SCT at Henry Ford Health in the United States of America. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin. The primary outcome was incidence of bloodstream bacterial infections (BSI) up to day 60 after SCT.

RESULTS

Between June 4, 2018, and May 23, 2022, we randomly assigned 308 consecutive patients to receive ciprofloxacin (154 patients) or levofloxacin (154 patients). BSI was similar in both the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin groups (18 [11.7%] vs 18 [11.7%]). Pneumonia was more frequent in the ciprofloxacin group compared to the levofloxacin group (18 [18%] vs 7 [23%]; relative risk 2.57, 95% CI 1.11-5.98; p = 0.028). There were no differences in neutrophil engraftment, fever, Clostridium difficile infection, relapse incidence, overall survival, non-relapse mortality, length of stay post-SCT, or intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both prophylaxis regimens demonstrated the same efficacy in SCT recipients, levofloxacin prophylaxis led to less pneumonia in the first 60 days post-SCT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03850379.

Levofloxacin prophylaxis in pediatric oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a literature review

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children and young adults receiving chemotherapy for malignancy or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly used to decrease the risk of BSI; however, antibiotics carry an inherent risk of complications. The aim of this manuscript is to review levofloxacin prophylaxis in pediatric oncology patients and HSCT recipients. We reviewed published literature on levofloxacin prophylaxis to prevent BSI in pediatric oncology patients and HSCT recipients. Nine manuscripts were identified. The use of levofloxacin is indicated in neutropenic children and young adults receiving intensive chemotherapy for leukemia or undergoing HSCT. These results support the efficacy of levofloxacin in pediatric patients with leukemia receiving intensive chemotherapy and should be considered in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT prior to engraftment.

Stopping antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: An internal audit

BACKGROUND

Antibacterial prophylaxis in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is controversial and not recommended by international guidelines. We analyzed relevant posttransplant outcomes following discontinuation of antibacterial prophylaxis at a major European pediatric transplant center.

METHODS

The single-center retrospective audit included all pediatric allogeneic HCT patients (pts) transplanted between 2011 and 2020 before (≤2014) and after (≥2015) stopping routine antibacterial prophylaxis with penicillin, metronidazole, and ciprofloxacin upon start of the conditioning regimen. The primary endpoint was overall survival until the first hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included the occurrence of fever; bacterial infections; and cumulative days with antibacterial agents until discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 257 HCT procedures were performed in 249 pts (median age: 10 years, range, 0.2-22.5) for leukemia/lymphoma (n = 150) and nonmalignant disorders (n = 107). Of these, 104 procedures were performed before (cohort 1) and 153 after (cohort 2) stopping prophylaxis. Overall survival until discharge was 90.4% in cohort 1 and 96.1% in cohort 2 (p = .06). No differences were observed in the occurrence of fever (92.3 vs. 94.1%; p = .57) and bacterial infections (34.6 vs. 25.5%; p = .11). The median number of days on antibacterial agents was significantly lower in cohort 2 (39 vs. 34; p = .002). Detection rates of resistant organisms were overall low.

CONCLUSION

In this single-center audit, the stop of routine antibacterial prophylaxis had no effect on the occurrence of fever, bacterial infections, resistant organisms, and GVHD. Overall antibiotic use was significantly reduced, and survival was noninferior to the historical control cohort.