Disturbance of Vancomycin Infusion Flow during Multidrug Infusion: Influence on Endothelial Cell Toxicity

Risk of thrombophlebitis associated with continuous peripheral infusion of vancomycin: The effect of dilution

INTRODUCTION

Although several guidelines recommend that prolonged administration of vancomycin should be preferably carried out by a central venous access, vancomycin is often given peripherally. Whether such risk may be affected by different modalities of administration in terms of dilution and time of infusion, it is a matter of controversy.

METHODS

This single-center prospective study enrolled all consecutive patients requiring prolonged intravenous infusion of vancomycin (1 g/day) using long peripheral cannula "mini-midline." Patients were randomized in study group (4 mg/ml) and control group (20 mg/ml). All patients were systematically evaluated every 24 h by the Visual Exit-Site Score and a daily ultrasound scan of the veins of the arm.

RESULTS

The daily ultrasound evaluation showed venous thrombosis at the distal tip of the cannula in all patients, in both groups. After this finding in the first 14 patients, the study was interrupted. All thromboses were completely asymptomatic and occurred in absence of any sign of catheter malfunction. The onset of thrombosis was significantly earlier in the control group (ranging from 24 to 48 h) than in the study group (ranging from 48 to 96 h), with an average of 30 ± 11 versus 68 ± 16 h (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Continuous intravenous infusion of vancomycin should be preferably delivered by a central venous access, as largely recommended by current guidelines, since peripheral infusion is inevitably associated with venous thrombosis, independently from the type of peripheral venous access device adopted (short peripheral cannula vs long peripheral cannula) and from the extent of dilution.

Progress in Research on the Mechanisms and Interventions of Phlebitis from the Perspective of Vascular Endothelial Cell and Signaling Pathway

Background

Phlebitis is a common complication of intravenous administration and greatly affects clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and health-care expenditure. Numerous studies have revealed venous injuries only through visual and histopathological examination. Although sporadic studies have explored the cellular and molecular biological mechanisms of phlebitis and the outcomes of pharmacological interventions, an updated review over the last decade is not available.

Methods

Progress in research on the mechanisms and interventions of phlebitis was summarized from the perspective of endothelial cells and signaling pathways by retrieving the PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, Embase, and CNKI.

Results

Phlebitis involves multiple signaling pathways (eg, nuclear factor kappa B, Wnt/β-catenin, focal adhesion kinase/protein kinase B, Toll-like receptor, protein kinase C beta/NADPH oxidase, PI3K/AKT/TNF, and JAK2/STAT3), upregulation of E-selectin, GBP5/NLRP3 inflammasome axis, cell apoptosis, intracellular ROS generation, SOD reduction, stimulation of angiogenesis, and induction of autophagy-associated cell death. Preventive and curative interventions included α-solanine, baicalein, escin, intermedin, Y15, micro-ribonucleic acid-223, sotrastaurin, cimetidine, aescin, resveratrol, α-chaconine, Chahuang ointment, QingLuoTongMai, Mailuo Shutong, and N-acetylcysteine. Laboratory models included vascular endothelial cells, real-time cell-monitoring analysis, network pharmacology analysis and experimental verification in vivo, animal models of phlebitis (rat, rabbit, and mouse), rabbit models with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) catheterization, models of PICC/central venous catheter indwelling with combined drugs in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and compatibility with endothelial cells. Factors affecting vascular endothelial cell injury include difference in the same class of drugs, concentration and exposure time of precipitant, and infusion strategy.

Conclusion

Phlebitis is accompanied by endothelial dysfunction and may involve multiple molecular and cellular mechanisms. These findings improve our understanding of the molecular targets of interventions and help identify effective candidates for the prophylaxis and treatment of phlebitis. Vascular health and risk management should be considered when initiating intravenous administration.

Simultaneous infusion of two incompatible antibiotics: Impact of the choice of infusion device and concomitant simulated fluid volume support on the particulate load and the drug mass flow rates

Vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are known to be incompatible. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the impact of their simultaneous infusion on mass flow rates and particulate load and identify preventive strategies. We assessed both static conditions and a reproduction of an infusion line used in a hospital's critical care unit. A high-performance liquid chromatography/UV diode array system and static and dynamic laser diffraction particle counters were used. The mass flow rates were primarily influenced by the choice of the infusion device and the presence of simulated fluid volume support. Drug incompatibility also appeared to affect vancomycin's mass flow rate, and the dynamic particulate load increased during flow rate changes - especially in the infusion set with a large common volume line and no concomitant simulated fluid volume support. Only discontinuation of the piperacillin/tazobactam infusion was associated with a higher particulate load in the infusion set with a large common volume line and no concomitant simulated fluid volume support. A low common volume line and the use of simulated fluid volume support were associated with smaller fluctuations in the mass flow rate. The clinical risk associated with a higher particulate load must now be assessed.