Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI)—Results of One-Stage Revision with Antibiotic-Impregnated Cancellous Allograft Bone—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Does the duration of antibiotic treatment following one-stage treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty influence the eradication rate? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature to elucidate the optimal duration of systemic antibiotic therapy following one-stage revision TKA in the setting of PJI.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in four databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without any publication date, language or study design filter on October 1, 2022. The search strategy adhered to PRISMA guidelines and consisted of four main keywords categories which were knee arthroplasty or knee prosthesis, infection and one-stage/single-stage revision. Duration of antibiotic administration were classified to three groups: short-term IV therapy (≤ two weeks), short-term IV therapy plus oral therapy, and long-term IV therapy (minimum six weeks).

RESULTS

We identified 963 studies, of which 21 were included in the systematic review. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species were the most frequently isolated pathogens. The mean eradication rate for all the studies analyzed was 88.4% (range, 62.5-100%). Short-term IV + long-term oral antibiotic therapy demonstrated significantly higher eradication rate compared to the other two regimens following one-stage revision TKA (p = 0.023) (Table 4). In the ten studies with great than five years of follow-up, this difference was no longer statistically significant. Subgroup analysis of antibiotic-loaded cement (ABLC) usage demonstrated higher eradication rates with short-term IV + long-term oral (92.8%) and long-term IV antibiotics (89.7%) compared to short-term IV antibiotics alone (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that short-term IV antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics had similar eradication rates to long-term IV antibiotics in long-term studies, which were both superior to short-term IV antibiotics alone. Nevertheless, there remains a need for prospective and randomized studies to further elucidate a patient-based protocol for the type and duration of antibiotic use following one-stage PJI treatment of the knee.

Dynamics of Synovial Fluid Markers Following Single-Stage Exchange and Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Procedure With Topical Antibiotic Infusion in Treating Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following total joint arthroplasty. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of synovial fluid markers following single-stage exchange arthroplasty or debridement, combined with antibiotics and implant retention with topical antibiotic infusion for PJI.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patient records at a tertiary hospital from March 1, 2018, to May 1, 2023. Patients who received single-stage exchange arthroplasty or debridement, combined with antibiotics and implant retention, followed by intra-articular antibiotic infusion for PJI, were included. Basic demographic details, comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, microorganism profile, presence of sinus tract, and antibiotic treatment type were collected. Synovial fluid samples were collected preoperatively and postoperatively every two days for 14 days to quantify synovial white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%).

RESULTS

The study included 140 patients who had a mean age of 63 years and a mean body mass index of 25. The results showed a steady decrease in synovial WBC count from preoperative levels to day 14 postoperatively. Patients who had successful outcomes had significantly higher preoperative WBC counts compared to those who had a treatment failure. The synovial PMN% initially increased postoperatively, peaking at days one to two, and then gradually declined. Patients who had successful outcomes showed a faster decline in PMN% compared to those who had persistent infections. Different bacteria exhibited varying preoperative synovial WBC counts and PMN%, but these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring synovial WBC count and PMN% can help distinguish between normal postoperative inflammation and persistent infection. Higher preoperative synovial WBC counts are associated with successful outcomes, suggesting their potential role in predicting treatment success. Future research with larger sample sizes is necessary to further validate these findings and improve the management and diagnosis of PJI.

What Is the Role of Local Antimicrobial Protection for One-Stage Revision for Peri-Prosthetic Hip Infection?

The aim of this review is to investigate the effective role of local antimicrobial protection for one-stage cemented and cementless hip revision surgery. Twelve studies reporting the results of cemented single-stage procedures with a minimum two-year follow-up were reviewed. When pooling together the data, no infection recurrence was observed on average in 83.3% of the patients (a range of 75.0% to 100%). Only two papers included patients treated without the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement, with an average infection control of 95.9% in a total of 195 patients. This figure appears to be better than the 80.7% infection control obtained by pooling together all the remaining studies. Concerning cementless one-stage revision, a total of 17 studies, reporting on 521 patients, showed an average of 90.0% (range 56.8% to 100%) no infection recurrence at a minimum two-year follow-up. No comparative study investigated cementless revision with or without local antibacterial protection. The pooled data showed an average infection control of 86.7%, without the application of local antibacterials, compared to 90.1% to 100% with local antimicrobial protection, depending on the technology used. No statistical difference could be found, either considering local antibacterial strategies alone or pooled together. No side effects had been reported by any local antibacterial technique. Local antibacterial protection for one-stage hip revision surgery, although safe and largely performed in the clinical setting, appears to still rely mainly on experts' opinions with no prospective or comparative trial, hence no definitive conclusion can be drawn concerning its effective role in one-stage hip revision surgery.

Efficacy and safety of intra-articular-only meropenem after one-stage revision for treating Escherichia coli-induced periprosthetic joint infection in a rat model

Aims

The optimum type of antibiotics and their administration route for treating Gram-negative (GN) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the GN bacterial species and antibacterial resistance rates related to clinical GN-PJI, and to determine the efficacy and safety of intra-articular (IA) antibiotic injection after one-stage revision in a GN pathogen-induced PJI rat model of total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 36 consecutive PJI patients who had been infected with GN bacteria between February 2015 and December 2021 were retrospectively recruited in order to analyze the GN bacterial species involvement and antibacterial resistance rates. Antibiotic susceptibility assays of the GN bacterial species were performed to screen for the most sensitive antibiotic, which was then used to treat the most common GN pathogen-induced PJI rat model. The rats were randomized either to a PJI control group or to three meropenem groups (intraperitoneal (IP), IA, and IP + IA groups). After two weeks of treatment, infection control level, the side effects, and the volume of antibiotic use were evaluated.

Results

Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen in GN-PJI, and meropenem was the most sensitive antibiotic. Serum inflammatory markers, weightbearing activity, and Rissing score were significantly improved by meropenem, especially in the IA and IP + IA groups ( p < 0.05). Meropenem in the IA group eradicated E. coli from soft-tissue, bone, and prosthetic surfaces, with the same effect as in the IP + IA group. Radiological results revealed that IA and IP + IA meropenem were effective at relieving bone damage. Haematoxylin and eosin staining also showed that IA and IP + IA meropenem improved synovial inflammation and bone destruction. No pathological changes in the main organs or abnormal serum markers were observed in any of the meropenem-treated rats. The IA group required the lowest amount of meropenem, followed by the IP and IP + IA groups.

Conclusion

IA-only meropenem with a two-week treatment course was effective and safe for PJI control following one-stage revision in a rat model, with less meropenem use.

Innovations in the Isolation and Treatment of Biofilms in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Comprehensive Review of Current and Emerging Therapies in Bone and Joint Infection Management

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a devastating complication of joint arthroplasty surgeries that are often complicated by biofilm formation. The development of biofilms makes PJI treatment challenging as they create a barrier against antibiotics and host immune responses. This review article provides an overview of the current understanding of biofilm formation, factors that contribute to their production, and the most common organisms involved in this process. This article focuses on the identification of biofilms, as well as current methodologies and emerging therapies in the management of biofilms in PJI.