Epidemiology and In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam against KPC-Producing K. pneumoniae Collected from Bacteremic Patients, 2018 to 2020

In Vitro Evaluation of Increasing Avibactam Concentrations on Ceftazidime Activity against Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Susceptible and Resistant KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Clinical Isolates

The novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) are one of the last-line resources available against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria. Among βL-βLICs, ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) demonstrated strong activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). Avibactam was proven to restore bactericidal activity of ceftazidime, inhibiting both KPC and OXA-48-like β-lactamases. Despite this, emergence of CAZ-AVI-resistant strains in Enterobacterales has been reported. Herein, we evaluated the in vitro ceftazidime activity in the presence of increasing concentrations of avibactam by the broth microdilution method against CAZ-AVI-susceptible and resistant genome-characterized KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical isolates. Strains expressing KPC and co-expressing KPC/OXA-181 carbapenemase were selected on the basis of the different phenotypic traits for novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol. Notably, avibactam at 8 mg/L maintained the MIC of ceftazidime above the clinical breakpoint in 14 out of 15 (93%) KPC-Kp resistant to CAZ-AVI. A high concentration of avibactam (i.e., 64 mg/L) is required to observe a bactericidal activity of ceftazidime against 9 out of 15 (60%) CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates. In vitro evaluation showed that with the increase in the concentration of avibactam, ceftazidime showed high activity against CAZ-AVI-susceptible strains. High concentrations of avibactam in vivo are required for ceftazidime to be active against CAZ-AVI-resistant KPC-Kp.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam: β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combination, the Future in Eradicating Multidrug Resistance

Due to the fact that there is a steadily increasing trend in the area of antimicrobial resistance in microorganisms, there is a need to look for new treatment alternatives. One of them is the search for new β-lactamase inhibitors and combining them with β-lactam antibiotics, with the aim of increasing the low-dose efficacy, as well as lowering the resistance potential of bacterial strains. This review presents the positive effect of meropenem in combination with a vaborbactam (MER-VAB). This latest antibiotic-inhibitor combination has found particular use in the treatment of infections with the etiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Gram-negative bacteria, with a high degree of resistance to available antimicrobial drugs.

Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic antimicrobial profile in carbapenemases producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Prompt administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy is crucial in improving outcomes, particularly in cases sustained by multi-drug resistant strains. Although phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) represents the gold standard to address antibiotics treatment, the long time required to obtained affordable results could negatively affect the prognosis. In contrast, rapid genotypic AST provide essential information for treatment and surveillance program. In order to evaluate the potential adoption of rapid AST in clinical routine, we compared the genotypic and phenotypic antimicrobial profiles of different K.pneumoniae strains, characterized by different expression of carbapenemases-encoding genes.

METHODS

A set of 109 strains of Cr-Kp were tested for the antimicrobial drugs by the automatized Vitek II system and, in parallel, to the new combination of β-lactams/β-lactamases inhibitors (BL/BLI) by Etest. An antimicrobial resistance index (ARI) was calculated for each strain, assigning each 1 or 0 points based on observed resistance/susceptibility, and dividing the total by the number of antibiotics tested. Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's post hoc test (Bonferroni correction), were used to compare quantitative variables among resistance gene subgroups.

RESULTS

We observed a higher ARI score in KPC/OXA-48 strains, similar profile in KPC alone and KPC/CTX-M groups and a significant lower resistance in no-carbapenemases-producing group. Same trend was observed in AST for BL/BLI.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results showed a close link between genotypic and phenotypic AST, supporting the adoption of rapid AST in cases of severe infections, ensuring to saving time and providing, the surveillance of MDR strains and improving stewardship programs.

#AMRrounds: a systematic educational approach for navigating bench to bedside antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to serve as a major global health crisis. Clinicians practising in this modern era are faced with ongoing challenges in the therapeutic management of patients suffering from antimicrobial-resistant infections. A strong educational understanding and synergistic application of clinical microbiology, infectious disease and pharmacological concepts can assist the adventuring clinician in the navigation of such cases. Important items include mobilizing laboratory testing for pathogen identification and susceptibility data, harnessing an understanding of intrinsic pathogen resistance, acknowledging epidemiological resistance trends, recognizing acquired AMR mechanisms, and consolidating these considerations when constructing an ideal pharmacological plan. In this article, we outline a novel framework by which to systematically approach clinical AMR, encourage AMR-related education and optimize therapeutic decision-making in AMR-related illnesses.

Synergistic Activity of Cefiderocol in Combination with Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Fosfomycin, Ampicillin-Sulbactam, Imipenem-Relebactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria

Limited treatment options are among the main reasons why antimicrobial resistance has become a leading major public health problem. In particular, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii have been included by the World Health Organization (WHO) among the pathogens for which new therapeutic agents are needed. The combination of antibiotics represents an effective strategy to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen infections. In this context, the aim of this study is to evaluate the in vitro activity of cefiderocol (CFD) in combination with different antimicrobial molecules against a collection of well-characterized clinical strains, exhibiting different patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility. Clinical strains were genomically characterized using Illumina iSeq100 platform. Synergy analyses were performed by combining CFD with piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), fosfomycin (FOS), ampicillin-sulbactam (AMP-SULB), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB) and imipenem-relebactam (IMI-REL). Our results demonstrated the synergistic effect of CFD in combination with FOS and CAZ-AVI against CRE and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab) clinical strains owing CFD-resistant profile, while the CFD and AMP-SULB combination was effective against CR-Pa strain displaying AMP-SULB-resistant profile. Moreover, the combination of CAZ-AVI/SULB showed synergistic activity in CAZ-AVI-resistant CRE strain. In conclusion, although further analyses are needed to confirm these results, our work showed the efficacy of CFD when used for synergistic formulations.

Comparison of Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion and Strip Test Methods for Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The aim of this study was to compare the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method with the Disk Diffusion (DD) test and strip test against a collection of 75 well-characterized Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical strains to assess cefiderocol (CFD) antimicrobial activity. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on KPC-Kp strains by Illumina iSeq100 platform. The Categorical Agreement (CA) between the BMD method and DD test was 92% (69/75) with a Major Error (ME) of 16.7% (6/36). Additionally, the CA between the BMD method and test strip was 90.7% (68/75) with a Very Major Error (VME) of 17.9% (7/39) and 82.7% (62/75) between the strip test and DD with a ME of 30.2%. KPC-Kp strains showing resistance to CFD were 27 out of 75 (36%) by three methods. Specifically, 51.9% (14/27) of KPC-Kp resistant to CFD harbored bla_KPC-3, while 48.1% (13/27) harbored mutated bla_KPC-3. Moreover, KPC-Kp strains carrying a mutated bla_KPC-3 gene exhibited high MIC values (p value < 0.001) compared to wild-type bla_KPC-3. In conclusion, the DD test resulted as a valid alternative to the BMD method to determine the in vitro susceptibility to CFD, while the strip test exhibited major limitations.