Amplification of Radiation-Induced Signal of LED Strip by Increasing Number of LED Chips and Using Amplifier Board

Development and characterization of an LED-based detector for dosimetry in diagnostic radiology

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) could be a potential dosimetry candidate because they are radiation hard, spectrally selective, direct band gap, and low-cost devices. Thus, an LED-based detector prototype was designed and characterized for dosimetry. A 20 × 20 cm2 array of surface mount device LED chips was sandwiched in photovoltaic mode between two intensifying screens to form a dosimetric system. The system was enclosed in a light-tight air cavity using black vinyl tape. The screens converted diagnostic X-ray beams into fluorescent blue light. LEDs, applied in detector mode, converted the fluorescent light into radiation-induced currents. A digital multimeter converted the analog currents into digital voltage signals. Prototype characterization was executed using (a) IEC 61267's RQR 7 (90 kVp) and RQR 8 (100 kVp) beam qualities, and (b) low (25 mAs) and high (80 mAs) beam quantities. A standard dosimeter probe was simultaneously exposed with the prototype to measure the prototype's absorbed dose. In all exposures, the X-ray beams were perpendicularly incident on both the dosimeter and prototype, at a fixed source to detector distance-60 cm. The LED array prototype's minimum detectable dose was 0.139 mGy, and the maximum dose implemented herein was ~ 13 mGy. The prototype was 99.18 % and 98.64 % linearly sensitive to absorbed dose and tube current-time product (mAs), respectively. The system was ± 4.69 % energy, ± 6.8 % dose, and ± 7.7 % dose rate dependent. Two prototype data sets were 89.93 % repeatable. We fabricated an ultrathin (5 mm), lightweight (130 g), and a relatively low-cost LED-based dosimetric prototype. The prototype executed a simple, efficient, and accurate real-time dosimetric mechanism. It could thus be an alternative to the current passive dosimetric systems.

Application of Bpw34 photodiode and cold white LED as diagnostic X-ray detectors: A comparative analysis

This study compares the real-time dosimetric performance of a bpw34 photodiode (PD) and cold white light-emitting diodes (LEDs) based on diagnostic X-ray-induced signals. Signals were extracted when both the transducers were under identical exposure settings, including source-to-detector distance (SDD), tube voltage (kVp), and current-time product (mAs). The transducers were in a photovoltaic configuration, and black vinyl tape was applied on transducer active areas as a form of optical shielding. X-ray beam spectra and energies were simulated using Matlab-based Spektr functions. Transducer performance analysis was based on signal linearity to mAs and air kerma, and sensitivity dependence on absorbed dose, energy, and dose rate. Bpw34 PD and cold white LED output signals were 84.8% and 85.5% precise, respectively. PD signals were 94.7% linear to mAs, whereas LED signals were 91.9%. PD and LED signal linearity to dose coefficients were 0.9397 and 0.9128, respectively. Both transducers exhibited similar dose and energy dependence. However, cold white LEDs were 0.73% less dose rate dependent than the bpw34 PD. Cold white LEDs demonstrated potential in detecting diagnostic X-rays because their performance was similar to that of the bpw34 PD. Moreover, the cold white LED array's dosimetric response was independent of the heel effect. Although cold white LED signals were lower than bpw34 PD signals, they were quantifiable and electronically amplifiable.