1
|
Zhang N, Xu Z, Deng W, Wang X. Recycling and Upcycling Spent LIB Cathodes: A Comprehensive Review. ELECTROCHEM ENERGY R 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s41918-022-00154-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
2
|
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries have become a crucial part of the energy supply chain for transportation (in electric vehicles) and renewable energy storage systems. Recycling is considered one of the most effective ways for recovering the materials for spent LIB streams and circulating the material in the critical supply chain. However, few review articles have been published in the research domain of recycling and the circular economy, with most mainly focusing on either recycling methods or the challenges and opportunities in the circular economy for spent LIBs. This paper reviewed 93 articles (66 original research articles and 27 review articles) identified in the Web of Science core collection database. The study showed that publications in the area are increasing exponentially, with many focusing on recycling and recovery-related issues; policy and regulatory affairs received less attention than recycling. Most of the studies were experiments followed by evaluation and planning (as per the categorization made). Pre-treatment processes were widely discussed, which is a critical part of hydrometallurgy and direct physical recycling (DPR). DPR is a promising recycling technique that requires further attention. Some of the issues that require further consideration include a techno-economic assessment of the recycling process, safe reverse logistics, a global EV assessment revealing material recovery potential, and a lifecycle assessment of experiments processes (both in the hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical processes). Furthermore, the application of the circular business model and associated stakeholders’ engagement, clear and definitive policy guidelines, extended producer responsibility implications, and material tracking, and identification deserve further focus. This study presents several future research directions that would be useful for academics and policymakers taking necessary steps such as product design, integrated recycling techniques, intra-industry stakeholder cooperation, business model development, techno-economic analysis, and others towards achieving a circular economy in the LIB value chain.
Collapse
|
3
|
Literature Review, Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles, Part I: Recycling Technology. ENERGIES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/en15031086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
During recent years, emissions reduction has been tightened worldwide. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for electric vehicles (EVs) that can meet emission requirements. The growing number of new EVs increases the consumption of raw materials during production. Simultaneously, the number of used EVs and subsequently retired lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) that need to be disposed of is also increasing. According to the current approaches, the recycling process technology appears to be one of the most promising solutions for the End-of-Life (EOL) LIBs—recycling and reusing of waste materials would reduce raw materials production and environmental burden. According to this performed literature review, 263 publications about “Recycling of Lithium-ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles” were classified into five sections: Recycling Processes, Battery Composition, Environmental Impact, Economic Evaluation, and Recycling & Rest. The whole work reviews the current-state of publications dedicated to recycling LIBs from EVs in the techno-environmental-economic summary. This paper covers the first part of the review work; it is devoted to the recycling technology processes and points out the main study fields in recycling that were found during this work.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cerrillo-Gonzalez MM, Villen-Guzman M, Vereda-Alonso C, Rodriguez-Maroto JM, Paz-Garcia JM. Acid leaching of LiCoO 2 enhanced by reducing agent. Model formulation and validation. CHEMOSPHERE 2022; 287:132020. [PMID: 34523444 DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
In this work, a model has been formulated to describe the complex process of LiCoO2 leaching through the participation of competing reactions in acid media including the effect of H2O2 as reducing agent. The model presented here describes the extraction of Li and Co in the presence and absence of H2O2, and it takes into account the different phenomena affecting the controlling mechanisms. In this context, the model predicts the swift from kinetic control to diffusion control. The model has been implemented and solved to simulate the leaching process. To validate the model and to estimate the model parameters, a set of 12 (in triplicate) extraction experiments were carried out varying the concentration of hydrochloric acid (within the range of 0.5-2.5 M) and hydrogen peroxide (range 0-0.6%v/v). The simulation results match fairly well with the experimental data for a wide range of conditions. Furthermore, the model can be used to predict results with different solid-liquid ratios as well as different acid and oxygen peroxide concentrations. This model could be used to design or optimize a LiCoO2 extraction process facilitating the corresponding economical balance of the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - M Villen-Guzman
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
| | - C Vereda-Alonso
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| | | | - J M Paz-Garcia
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang H, Li M, Garg S, Wu Y, Nazmi Idros M, Hocking R, Duan H, Gao S, Yago AJ, Zhuang L, Rufford TE. Cobalt Electrochemical Recovery from Lithium Cobalt Oxides in Deep Eutectic Choline Chloride+Urea Solvents. CHEMSUSCHEM 2021; 14:2972-2983. [PMID: 34041864 DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202100954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Electrochemical recovery of the cobalt in deep eutectic solvent shows its promise in recycling and recovery of valuable elements from the spent lithium-ion battery due to its high selectivity and minimal environmental impacts. This work unveiled the roles of the substrates, applied potentials, and operating temperatures on the performance of cobalt electrochemical recovery in a deep eutectic choline chloride+urea solvent. The solvent contains cobalt and lithium ions extracted from lithium cobalt oxides - 3an essential lithium-ion battery cathode material. Our results highlight that the substrate predetermines the cobalt recovery modes via substrate-cobalt interactions, which could be predicted by the cobalt surface segregation energies and crystallographic misfits. We also show that a moderate cathode potential under -1.0 V vs. silver quasi-reference electrode at 94-104 °C is essential to ensure a selective cobalt recovery at an optimal rate. We also found that the stainless-steel mesh is an optimal substrate for cobalt recovery due to its relatively high selectivity, fast recovery rate, and easy cobalt collection. Our work provides new insights on metal recovery in deep eutectic solvents and offers a new avenue to control the metal electrodeposition modes via modulation of substrate compositions and crystal structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongmin Wang
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mengran Li
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sahil Garg
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yuming Wu
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Mohamed Nazmi Idros
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rosalie Hocking
- Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Centre for Translational Atomaterials and ARC Training Centre for Surface Engineering for Advanced Materials, SEAM, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, 3122, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Haoran Duan
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
- Advanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shuai Gao
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anya Josefa Yago
- Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Linzhou Zhuang
- School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, P. R. China
| | - Thomas Edward Rufford
- School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|