1
|
Ali S, Dar MA, Liaqat F, Sethupathy S, Rani A, Khan MI, Rehan M, Zhu D. Optimization of biomethane production from lignocellulosic biomass by a developed microbial consortium. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 2024; 184:1106-1118. [DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
|
2
|
Ulukardesler AH. Anaerobic co-digestion of grass and cow manure: kinetic and GHG calculations. Sci Rep 2023; 13:6320. [PMID: 37072450 PMCID: PMC10113394 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-33169-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Grass is a highly desirable substrate for anaerobic digestion because of its higher biodegradability and biogas/methane yield. In this study, anaerobic co-digestion of grass, cow manure and sludge was studied under mesophilic conditions for 65 days. Experiments were performed on a feed ratio of grass/manure from 5 to 25%, respectively. The maximum cumulative biogas and methane yield was obtained as 331.75 mLbiogas/gVS and 206.64 mLCH4/gVS for 25% ratio. Also, the results of the experiments were tested on the three different kinetics model which are the first order kinetic model, modified Gompertz model and Logistics model. As a result of the study, it was found that by using grass nearly 480 × 106 kWh/year electricity may be produced and 0.5 × 106 tons/year CO2 greenhouse gas emission mitigation may be reached.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rahmani AM, Tyagi VK, Gunjyal N, Kazmi AA, Ojha CSP, Moustakas K. Hydrothermal and thermal-alkali pretreatments of wheat straw: Co-digestion, substrate solubilization, biogas yield and kinetic study. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2023; 216:114436. [PMID: 36183791 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Agro-waste having lignocellulosic biomass is considered most effective (heating value 16 MJ/kg) for energy production through anaerobic digestion (AD). However, recalcitrant lignocellulosic fraction in agro-waste obstructs its biotransformation and is a rate-limiting step of the process. This study investigated the effects of hydrothermal and thermal-alkaline pretreatment on anaerobic co-digestion of wheat straw (WS). The hydrothermal pretreatment of WS revealed that 60 min was the best pretreatment time to achieve the highest substrate solubilization. It was employed for thermal-alkali pretreatment at variable temperatures and NaOH doses. Thermal-alkali pretreatment at 125°C-7% NaOH shows the highest (34%) biogas yield of 662 mL/gVS, followed by 646 mL/gVS biogas yield at 150°C-1% NaOH assay (31% higher) over control. Although the 125°C-7% NaOH assay achieved the highest biogas yield, the 150°C-1% NaOH assay was found more feasible considering the cost of a 6% higher chemical used in the earlier assay. The thermal-alkali pretreatment was observed to reduce the formation of recalcitrant compounds (HMF, Furfural) and increase the buffering capacity of the slurry over hydrothermal pretreatment. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the various pretreatment and AD operational parameters was carried out to study their in-depth correlation. Moreover, a kinetic study of the experimental data was performed to observe the biodegradation trend and compare it with the Modified Gompertz (MG) and First Order (FO) models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Mohammad Rahmani
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 247667, India; Water and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kandahar University, Afghanistan
| | - Vinay Kumar Tyagi
- Environmental Hydrology Division, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 247667, India.
| | - Neelam Gunjyal
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 247667, India
| | - A A Kazmi
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 247667, India
| | | | - Konstantinos Moustakas
- School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, 15780, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Recent Advances in the Bioconversion of Waste Straw Biomass with Steam Explosion Technique: A Comprehensive Review. Processes (Basel) 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/pr10101959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Waste straw biomass is an abundant renewable bioresource raw material on Earth. Its stubborn wooden cellulose structure limits straw lignocellulose bioconversion into value-added products (e.g., biofuel, chemicals, and agricultural products). Compared to physicochemical and other preprocessing techniques, the steam explosion method, as a kind of hydrothermal method, was considered as a practical, eco-friendly, and cost-effective method to overcome the above-mentioned barriers during straw lignocellulose bioconversion. Steam explosion pretreatment of straw lignocellulose can effectively improve the conversion efficiency of producing biofuels and value-added chemicals and is expected to replace fossil fuels and partially replace traditional chemical fertilizers. Although the principles of steam explosion destruction of lignocellulosic structures for bioconversion to liquid fuels and producing solid biofuel were well known, applications of steam explosion in productions of value-added chemicals, organic fertilizers, biogas, etc. were less identified. Therefore, this review provides insights into advanced methods of utilizing steam explosion for straw biomass conversion as well as their corresponding processes and mechanisms. Finally, the current limitations and prospects of straw biomass conversion with steam explosion technology were elucidated.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rahmani AM, Tyagi VK, Ahmed B, Kazmi AA, Ojha CSP, Singh R. Critical insights into anaerobic co-digestion of wheat straw with food waste and cattle manure: Synergistic effects on biogas yield and kinetic modeling. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2022; 212:113382. [PMID: 35568237 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In this study, four batch assays were performed to ensure the synergic effects of co-digestion and find out the best inoculums to substrate ratio (ISR), carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N), and total solid (TS) percentage in sequence. The co-digestion of three feedstocks had a 20% higher biogas yield (416 mL/gVS added) than mono-digestion with 21% volatile solids (VS) degradation. The ISR of 2 leads to the highest biogas yield (431 mL/gVS added) and VS removal (30.3%) over other ISRs (0.5, 1.0, 2.5) studied. The lower ISR (<2) tended to have lower pH due to insufficient anaerobes inside the digester. The C:N 35 (with ISR 2) yielded 17.4% higher biogas (443.5 mL/gVS added) than mono-digestion and was the highest among the C:N ratios studied with 36.6% VS removal. The VFA, alkalinity, and pH in C:N 35 assay were more stable than in other C:N assays. In the fourth batch assay, varying TS% (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5) were used with optimized ISR (2) and C:N (35). Higher TS% (10 and 12.5) had some lag phase but later achieved higher biogas production. The 12.5% TS assay achieved 80% higher biogas yield (679 mL/gVS added) over mono-digestion, i.e., highest among the TS% studied, with 48% VS removal. In conclusion, co-digestion of mixed feedstocks with ISR 2, C:N 35, and TS 12.5% could degrade almost half of the substrate available for biodegradation. Further biodegradation may require pretreatment of the recalcitrant WS. Modified Gompertz, first-order, transference, and logistic models were used for kinetic study and curve fitting of experimental data. For the optimized batch assays, the estimated specific rate constants were 0.08, 0.12, 0.083, and 0.084. The data fits well in all the models, with the coefficient of discrimination (R2) ranging from 0.882 to 0.999.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Mohammad Rahmani
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 247667, India; Water and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kandahar University, Afghanistan
| | - Vinay Kumar Tyagi
- Enironmental Hydrology Division, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 247667, India.
| | - Banafsha Ahmed
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 247667, India
| | - A A Kazmi
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 247667, India
| | | | - Rajesh Singh
- Enironmental Hydrology Division, National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 247667, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kabaivanova L, Petrova P, Hubenov V, Simeonov I. Biogas Production Potential of Thermophilic Anaerobic Biodegradation of Organic Waste by a Microbial Consortium Identified with Metagenomics. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12050702. [PMID: 35629369 PMCID: PMC9148150 DOI: 10.3390/life12050702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a widespread biological process treating organic waste for green energy production. In this study, wheat straw and corn stalks without any harsh preliminary treatment were collected as a renewable source to be employed in a laboratory-scale digester to produce biogas/biomethane. Processes parameters of temperature, pH, total solids, volatile solid, concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), and cellulose concentration, were followed. The volume of biogas produced was measured. The impact of organic loading was stated, showing that the process at 55 °C tolerated a higher substrate load, up to 45 g/L. Further substrate increase did not lead to biogas accumulation increase, probably due to inhibition or mass transfer limitations. After a 12-day anaerobic digestion process, cumulative volumes of biogas yields were 4.78 L for 1 L of the bioreactor working volume with substrate loading 30 g/L of wheat straw, 7.39 L for 40 g/L and 8.22 L for 45 g/L. The degree of biodegradation was calculated to be 68.9%, 74% and 72%, respectively. A fast, effective process for biogas production was developed from native wheat straw, with the highest quantity of daily biogas production occurring between day 2 and day 5. Biomethane concentration in the biogas was 60%. An analysis of bacterial diversity by metagenomics revealed that more than one third of bacteria belonged to class Clostridia (32.9%), followed by Bacteroidia (21.5%), Betaproteobacteria (11.2%), Gammaproteobacteria (6.1%), and Alphaproteobacteria (5%). The most prominent genera among them were Proteiniphilum, Proteiniborus, and Pseudomonas. Archaeal share was 1.37% of the microflora in the thermophilic bioreactor, as the genera Methanocorpusculum, Methanobacterium, Methanomassiliicoccus, Methanoculleus, and Methanosarcina were the most abundant. A knowledge of the microbiome residing in the anaerobic digester can be further used for the development of more effective processes in conjunction with theidentified consortium.
Collapse
|
7
|
Monitoring of Food Waste Anaerobic Digestion Performance: Conventional Co-Substrates vs. Unmarketable Biochar Additions. Foods 2021; 10:foods10102353. [PMID: 34681402 PMCID: PMC8535009 DOI: 10.3390/foods10102353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study proposed the selection of cost-effective additives generated from different activity sectors to enhance and stabilize the start-up, as well as the transitional phases, of semi-continuous food waste (FW) anaerobic digestion. The results showed that combining agricultural waste mixtures including wheat straw (WS) and cattle manure (CM) boosted the process performance and generated up to 95% higher methane yield compared to the control reactors (mono-digested FW) under an organic loading rate (OLR) range of 2 to 3 kg VS/m3·d. Whereas R3 amended with unmarketable biochar (UBc), to around 10% of the initial fresh mass inserted, showed a significant process enhancement during the transitional phase, and more particularly at an OLR of 4 kg VS/m3·d, it was revealed that under these experimental conditions, FW reactors including UBc showed an increase of 144% in terms of specific biogas yield (SBY) compared to FW reactors fed with agricultural residue. Hence, both agricultural and industrial waste were efficacious when it came to boosting either FW anaerobic performance or AD effluent quality. Although each co-substrate performed under specific experimental conditions, this feature provides decision makers with diverse alternatives to implement a sustainable organic waste management system, conveying sufficient technical details to draw up appropriate designs for the recovery of various types of organic residue.
Collapse
|
8
|
Anaerobic Digestion for Producing Renewable Energy-The Evolution of This Technology in a New Uncertain Scenario. ENTROPY 2021; 23:e23020145. [PMID: 33503933 PMCID: PMC7912667 DOI: 10.3390/e23020145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion is a well-known technology with wide application in the treatment of high-strength organic wastes. The economic feasibility of this type of installation is usually attained thanks to the availability of fiscal incentives. In this review, an analysis of the different factors associated with this biological treatment and a description of alternatives available in literature for increasing performance of the process were provided. The possible integration of this process into a biorefinery as a way for producing energy and chemical products from the conversion of wastes and biomass also analyzed. The future outlook of anaerobic digestion will be closely linked to circular economy principles. Therefore, this technology should be properly integrated into any production system where energy can be recovered from organics. Digestion can play a major role in any transformation process where by-products need further stabilization or it can be the central core of any waste treatment process, modifying the current scheme by a concatenation of several activities with the aim of increasing the efficiency of the conversion. Thus, current plants dedicated to the treatment of wastewaters, animal manures, or food wastes can become specialized centers for producing bio-energy and green chemicals. However, high installation costs, feedstock dispersion and market distortions were recognized as the main parameters negatively affecting these alternatives.
Collapse
|