Acoustic Identification of the Voicing Boundary during Intervocalic Offsets and Onsets based on Vocal Fold Vibratory Measures

Influence of Speech Rate on Auditory Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to verify the influence of speech stimulus presentation and speed on auditory recognition in cochlear implant (CI) users with poorer performance.

METHODS

The cross-sectional observational study applied auditory speech perception tests to fifteen adults, using three different ways of presenting the stimulus, in the absence of competitive noise: monitored live voice (MLV); recorded speech at typical speed (RSTS); recorded speech at slow speed (RSSS). The scores were assessed using the Percent Sentence Recognition Index (PSRI). The data were inferentially analysed using the Friedman and Wilcoxon tests with a 95% confidence interval and 5% significance level (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The mean age was 41.1 years, the mean duration of CI use was 11.4 years, and the mean hearing threshold was 29.7 ± 5.9 dBHL. Test performance, as determined by the PSRI, was MLV = 42.4 ± 17.9%; RSTS = 20.3 ± 14.3%; RSSS = 40.6 ± 20.7%. There was a significant difference identified for RSTS compared to MLV and RSSS.

CONCLUSION

The way the stimulus is presented and the speed at which it is presented enable greater auditory speech recognition in CI users, thus favouring comprehension when the tests are applied in the MLV and RSSS modalities.

Effects of Cognitive Stress on Voice Acoustics in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders

PURPOSE

Autonomic nervous system dysfunction has been implicated in the development and persistence of hyperfunctional voice disorders (HVDs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of cognitive stress, which is known to arouse the autonomic nervous system, on voice acoustics in female speakers with and without HVDs.

METHOD

Adult female speakers-66 with HVDs, 66 without-were recorded while speaking with and without a cognitive stressor. Root-mean-square (RMS) of amplitude, fundamental frequency (f _o), low-to-high spectral energy ratio (L/H ratio), cepstral peak prominence (CPP), and relative f _o (RFF) were measured for each speaker and cognitive stress condition. Mixed-model analyses of variance and post hoc t tests were conducted to determine if cognitive stress affected voice acoustics and whether voice changes were greater for those with HVDs.

RESULTS

All measures differed significantly under cognitive stress for speakers with and without HVDs. RMS and CPP increased whereas f _o, CPP, and RFF decreased under cognitive stress. Changes in these measures were not greater in those with HVDs.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive stress and presumed autonomic arousal affect voice similarly in female speakers with and without HVDs.

Segmentation of Glottal Images from High-Speed Videoendoscopy Optimized by Synchronous Acoustic Recordings

Laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy (LHSV) is an imaging technique offering novel visualization quality of the vibratory activity of the vocal folds. However, in most image analysis methods, the interaction of the medical personnel and access to ground truth annotations are required to achieve accurate detection of vocal folds edges. In our fully automatic method, we combine video and acoustic data that are synchronously recorded during the laryngeal endoscopy. We show that the image segmentation algorithm of the glottal area can be optimized by matching the Fourier spectra of the pre-processed video and the spectra of the acoustic recording during the phonation of sustained vowel /i:/. We verify our method on a set of LHSV recordings taken from subjects with normophonic voice and patients with voice disorders due to glottal insufficiency. We show that the computed geometric indices of the glottal area make it possible to discriminate between normal and pathologic voices. The median of the Open Quotient and Minimal Relative Glottal Area values for healthy subjects were 0.69 and 0.06, respectively, while for dysphonic subjects were 1 and 0.35, respectively. We also validate these results using independent phoniatrician experts.