The Role of Powered Surgical Instruments in Ear Surgery: An Acoustical Blessing or a Curse?

The Impact of Piezoelectric Device in Cholesteatoma Endoscopic Surgery: Retrospective Evaluation of Safety and Functional Results

OBJECTIVE

Atticotomy represents an essential surgical step within the management of attical cholesteatoma during endoscopic ear surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and functional results of an endoscopic atticotomy performed with piezosurgery, in terms of audiological outcomes and tissue's healing.

METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study on patients with attical cholesteatoma who underwent endoscopic ear surgery with piezoelectric atticotomy and subsequent scutum reconstruction either with tragal cartilage or temporalis muscle fascia. Scutumplasty's status was evaluated via scheduled outpatient controls through an endoscopic check and classified as stable or unstable at least 10 months after surgery. A pre- and postoperative audiometric examination was performed in each patient.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled. In 50 out of 84 patients (59.52%), an exclusive endoscopic procedure was performed, whereas in 34 patients (40.48%) a combined microscopic/endoscopicapproach was adopted. In 72 cases (85.71%), scutum's reconstruction appeared to be normally positioned, whereas 12 patients developed a retraction pocket, which was self-cleaning in 8 of them and non-self-cleaning in the remaining 4. In 17 patients, a slight sensorineural hearing loss (between 5 and 15 dBHL) was observed, and in 2 patients, the loss was greater than 15 dBHL. Overall, no significative differences between pre- and postoperative pure-tone average bone thresholds resulted (p = 0.4983), though a mild significant hearing deterioration was detected by the specific analysis at 4000 Hz (p = 0.0291).

CONCLUSION

Piezosurgery represents an extremely useful tool in performing atticotomy during endoscopic tympanoplasties. Our data seem to support the safety of its usage in this specific step, as it did not lead to any significant sensorineural damage on overall pure-tone average. Moreover, satisfactory tissue healing in regard to scutum reconstruction was observed.

[Piezoelectric ear surgery: a systematic review. German version]

BACKGROUND

The piezoelectric instrument (PEI) offers a novel technique for bone removal in ear surgery with a combination of micro-oscillation and cavitation. The aim of this review is to explore the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of this instrument in comparison to the drill.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The primary selection included all studies reporting on the use of PEI in ear surgery or its effect on the inner ear. Only studies with a control group were included in the secondary selection.

RESULTS

The first search identified 49 studies between 2003 and 2022. These reported on a total of 1162 ear operations, during which PEI was used for various indications. Most data were based on uncontrolled retrospective studies or case reports (76%). Only one of the five controlled clinical studies was prospective and randomized. The advantages of PEI weighed against its limitations and disadvantages were critically analyzed in comparison to the drill.

CONCLUSION

Piezoelectric surgery is an innovative and promising surgical technique in the temporal bone. PEI appears to enable safer and more precise bone removal in close proximity to soft tissue when compared to the drill. The slower bone removal and cost factors represent current limitations to its wider use in ear surgery.

Piezoelectric canalplasty for exostoses and osteoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety profile and surgical technique for removal of symptomatic exostoses and osteoma of the external auditory canal with a micro-oscillating piezoelectric device.

METHOD

A chart review was conducted on patients undergoing piezoelectric canalplasty between 2019 and 2021 at tertiary referral hospital. Surgery was performed by two surgeons with varying experience. Bone removal was achieved using both osteotomy and osteoplasty. Postoperative complications, operative time and hearing outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study comprised 16 patients (16 ears). No major complications occurred. The skin of the auditory canal was completely preserved in all patients without injury to the tympanic membrane. Except for one patient with known noise-induced hearing loss, there was no postoperative deterioration of the bone-conduction threshold more than 10 dB HL at any frequency. The difference of the bone-conduction threshold in pure-tone audiometry (average for 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) three weeks postoperatively had a median of 0.6 dB ± 5.7. One patient complained of temporary new tinnitus. One patient had prolonged wound healing. Mean operative time was comparable with literature data.

CONCLUSION

The atraumatic characteristics of the piezoelectric instrument enable low-risk removal of external auditory canal exostoses and osteoma. Through the combination of precise osteotomy and osteoplasty, this novel instrument has the potential to become established in routine canalplasty.

Special Issue on Modelling, Simulation and Data Analysis in Acoustical Problems

Modelling and simulation in acoustics is gathering more and more importance nowadays [...]