Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiple D-Dimer Cutoff Thresholds and Other Clinically Applicable Biomarkers for the Detection and Radiographic Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism

Beyond the fractures: A comprehensive Comparative analysis of Affordable and Accessible laboratory parameters and their coefficients for prediction and Swift confirmation of pulmonary embolism in high-risk orthopedic patients

Background

Pulmonary embolism (PE) poses a significant challenge in diagnosis and treatment, particularly in high-risk patient populations such as those hospitalized for orthopedic reasons. This study explores the predictive and diagnostic potential of laboratory parameters in identifying PE among orthopedic patients.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine whether selected (inexpensive and readily available) laboratory parameters and their coefficients can be used to diagnose pulmonary embolism and whether they are applicable in predicting its occurrence.

Material and methods

Selected laboratory parameters were determined twice in 276 hospitalized orthopedic patients with suspected PE: PLT, MPV, NEU, LYM, D-dimer, troponin I, age-adjusted D-dimer and their coefficients. Depending on the angio-CT results, patients were divided into groups. Selected popular laboratory coefficients were calculated and statistically analyzed. Optimal cutoff points were determined for the above laboratory tests and ROC curves were plotted.

Results

D-dimer/troponin I [p = 0.008], D-dimer [p = 0.001], age-adjusted D-dimer [p = 0.007], NLR/D-dimer [p = 0.005] and PLR [p = 0.021] are statistically significant predictors of PE. D-dimer/troponin I [p < 0.001], troponin I [p = 0.005] and age-adjusted D-dimer [p = 0.001] correlated with the diagnosis of PE after the onset of clinical symptoms.

Conclusions

In the context of orthopedic patients, cost-effective laboratory parameters, particularly the D-dimer/troponin I ratio and age-adjusted D-dimer, exhibit considerable potential in predicting and diagnosing PE. These findings suggest that combining readily available laboratory tests with clinical observation can offer a viable and cost-effective diagnostic alternative, especially in resource-constrained settings. Further studies with larger and diverse patient populations are recommended to validate these results.

Incidence and Prognostic Role of Pleural Effusion in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Pleural effusion is a common pulmonary embolism (PE) complication, which has been documented to increase the risk of death in PE and relate to disease progression. However, the incidence of pleural effusion varies among studies and its association with PE outcome is still unclear. This study sought to determine the pooled incidence and prognostic value of pleural effusion events in patients with PE. Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPE, Web of Science, Cochrane, LILACS, CINAHL, EBSCO, AMED, and OVID databases from the inception of each database to 7 September 2022 with a restriction on human studies, to identify studies assessing the association between pleural effusion and PE including all prospective and retrospective clinical studies. An exploratory meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. We evaluated the heterogeneity and performed subgroup analyses. Results: The final meta-analysis included 29 studies involving 13,430 PE patients. The pooled incidence of pleural effusion in PE patients was 41.2% (95% CI: 35.7–46.6%), which tended to be unilateral (pooled incidence: 60.8%, 95% CI: 45.7–75.8%) and small (pooled incidence: 85.9%, 95% CI: 82.6–89.1%). Pooled analysis using a random-effects model (I2 = 53.2%) showed that pleural effusion was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (RR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.53–3.15, p < 0.001, I2 = 67.1%) and in-hospital mortality (RR 2.39, 95% CI: 1.85–3.09, p < 0.001, I2 = 37.1%) in patients with PE. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis found that PE patients had a high incidence of pleural effusion, which was usually unilateral and small. Pleural effusion generally increases 30-day and in-hospital mortality in patients with PE, and it is recommended that physicians be aware of the risk of death from PE, especially when patients have pleural effusion. Further investigations focusing on PE with pleural effusion are warranted.

The Correlation Between the D-Dimer Values and Anatomical Distribution of Pulmonary Embolism

Background

Pulmonary Embolism (PE) represents a life-threatening medical emergency that, given the serious complications, requires urgent application of anticoagulant therapy. In addition to other factors that are taken into account when choosing a therapy for treatment of PE, the anatomical distribution of thrombi is also considered-whether it is a central, lobar, segmental or subsegmental PE. D-dimer is an intermediate product of degradation of fibrin molecules and its values in the plasma are increased in the case of PE, but also in other diseases.

Objective

To determine whether there is a difference in D-dimer values in subjects with different anatomical distribution of PE.

Methods

The study included 100 subjects with diagnosed PE by using MSCT and/or V/P SPECT and with measured values of D-dimer.

Results

Out of 100 subjects, PE was not diagnosed in 37 subjects, while 63 subjects PE was diagnosed. All subjects with diagnosed PE were divided into 3 groups regarding the anatomical localization of thrombus: lobar, segmental or subsegmental. Average D-dimer values were calculated for all 3 groups. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference in D-dimer values between subjects with different anatomical distribution of PE.

Conclusion

There is no significant difference in D-dimer values between subjects with different anatomical distribution od PE-lobar, segmental and subsegmental PE.