Benefits from Incorporating Virtual Reality in Pulmonary Rehabilitation of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of virtual reality-based therapy in pulmonary rehabilitation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In addition to conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the use of virtual reality-based therapy (VRBT) has been proposed as an effective complementary tool to be included in PR programs for COPD.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effectiveness of VRBT on functional capacity, pulmonary function, and functional mobility in patients with COPD.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was carried out through a bibliographic search in PubMed (Medline), WOS, PEDro, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and Scopus since inception up to June 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the PEDro scale, and the effect was determined using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) in a random effects model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs, providing data from 344 participants with a mean age 65.7 ± 5.3 years old, were included. The mean methodological quality of the studies included was good (6.8 ± 1.6 points). The meta-analysis showed that VRBT was effective in increasing functional capacity, assessed with the 6 Min Walking Test, (SMD=0.4, 95 % CI 0.07 to 0.71, p = 0.017); pulmonary function, assessed with FEV1 (SMD=0.33, 95 %CI 0.01 to 0.65, p = 0.048); and functional mobility, assessed with the Get Up and Go Test (SMD=0.77, 95 % CI 0.5 to 1.1, p<0.001) in patients with COPD.

CONCLUSION

VRBT is suggested to be effective in increasing functional capacity, pulmonary function, and functional mobility in patients with COPD. Non-immersive VRBT is the most used modality of VRBT in PR.

Correction: Patsaki et al. Benefits from Incorporating Virtual Reality in Pulmonary Rehabilitation of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Respir. Med. 2023, 91, 324-336

Error in Figure 3 [...].

Reply to Salimi, M. Comment on "Patsaki et al. Benefits from Incorporating Virtual Reality in Pulmonary Rehabilitation of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Respir. Med. 2023, 91, 324-336"

We are writing in response to the comment [...].

Comment on Patsaki et al. Benefits from Incorporating Virtual Reality in Pulmonary Rehabilitation of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Respir. Med. 2023, 91, 324-336

I am writing this comment regarding the review article by Patsaki et al. titled "Benefits from Incorporating Virtual Reality in Pulmonary Rehabilitation of COPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" [...].

Virtual reality as an adjunct to pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent chronic lung disease characterised by persistent and progressive airflow obstruction resulting from tracheal and/or alveolar lesions. Patients afflicted with COPD endure a poor quality of life primarily due to the symptoms of the disease. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) constitutes a core component of the comprehensive management of individuals dealing with COPD. Nevertheless, suboptimal adherence and completion rates are the chief impediments associated with PR. Virtual reality (VR) is emerging as a promising approach to support patients with COPD in their PR journey. Currently, no comprehensive systematic review has evaluated the impact of VR as a PR adjunct in patients with COPD. We aimed to investigate and summarise the evidence from recent studies related to the effect of VR as an adjunct to PR in COPD cases.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a comprehensive search of databases, including Web of Science, CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception up to May 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials examining VR as an adjunct to PR in patients with COPD, with no restrictions on publication status or language. Our primary outcome measure will be the 6-min walk test. Two independent researchers will screen the literature for suitable articles for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Data collection and assessment of bias risk will be performed. This meta-analysis is intended to furnish data on each outcome as sufficient data become available. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the χ2 test and I2 statistics. The current review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. Furthermore, the findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022374736.

Biofeedback Respiratory Rehabilitation Training System Based on Virtual Reality Technology

Traditional respiratory rehabilitation training fails to achieve visualization and quantification of respiratory data in improving problems such as decreased lung function and dyspnea in people with respiratory disorders, and the respiratory rehabilitation training process is simple and boring. Therefore, this article designs a biofeedback respiratory rehabilitation training system based on virtual reality technology. It collects respiratory data through a respiratory sensor and preprocesses it. At the same time, it combines the biofeedback respiratory rehabilitation training virtual scene to realize the interaction between respiratory data and virtual scenes. This drives changes in the virtual scene, and finally the respiratory data are fed back to the patient in a visual form to evaluate the improvement of the patient's lung function. This paper conducted an experiment with 10 participants to evaluate the system from two aspects: training effectiveness and user experience. The results show that this system has significantly improved the patient's lung function. Compared with traditional training methods, the respiratory data are quantified and visualized, the rehabilitation training effect is better, and the training process is more active and interesting.