Collinearity and Dimensionality Reduction in Radiomics: Effect of Preprocessing Parameters in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping

Test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features from quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping

Radiomics of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has proved to be potentially useful in the study of various myocardial diseases. Therefore, assessing the repeatability degree in radiomic features measurement is of fundamental importance. The aim of this study was to assess test-retest repeatability of myocardial radiomic features extracted from quantitative T1 and T2 maps. A representative group of 24 subjects (mean age 54 ± 18 years) referred for clinical cardiac MR imaging were enrolled in the study. For each subject, T1 and T2 mapping through MOLLI and T2-prepared TrueFISP acquisition sequences, respectively, were performed at 1.5 T. Then, 98 radiomic features of different classes (shape, first-order, second-order) were extracted from a region of interest encompassing the whole left ventricle myocardium in a short axis slice. The repeatability was assessed performing different and complementary analyses: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LOA) (i.e., the interval within which 95% of the percentage differences between two repeated measures are expected to lie). Radiomic features were characterized by a relatively wide range of repeatability degree in terms of both ICC and LOA. Overall, 44.9% and 38.8% of radiomic features showed ICC values > 0.75 for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, while 25.5% and 23.4% of radiomic features showed LOA between ±10%. A subset of radiomic features for T1 (Mean, Median, 10Percentile, 90Percentile, RootMeanSquared, Imc2, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized, RunPercentage and ShortRunEmphasis) and T2 (MaximumDiameter, RunLengthNonUniformityNormalized, RunPercentage, ShortRunEmphasis) maps presented both ICC > 0.75 and LOA between ±5%. Overall, radiomic features extracted from T1 maps showed better repeatability performance than those extracted from T2 maps, with shape features characterized by better repeatability than first-order and textural features. Moreover, only a limited subset of 9 and 4 radiomic features for T1 and T2 maps, respectively, showed high repeatability degree in terms of both ICC and LOA. These results confirm the importance of assessing test-retest repeatability degree in radiomic feature estimation and might be useful for a more effective/reliable use of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping radiomics in clinical or research studies.

Impact of Preprocessing Parameters in Medical Imaging-Based Radiomic Studies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Lately, radiomic studies featuring the development of a signature to use in prediction models in diagnosis or prognosis outcomes have been increasingly published. While the results are shown to be promising, these studies still have many pitfalls and limitations. One of the main issues of these studies is that radiomic features depend on how the images are preprocessed before their computation. Since, in widely known and used software for radiomic features calculation, it is possible to set these preprocessing parameters before the calculation of the radiomic feature, there are ongoing studies assessing the stability and repeatability of radiomic features to find the most suitable preprocessing parameters for every used imaging modality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search using four electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus. Mesh terms and free text were modeled in search strategies for databases. The inclusion criteria were studies where preprocessing parameters' influence on feature values and model predictions was addressed. Records lacking information on image acquisition parameters were excluded, and any eligible studies with full-text versions were included in the review process, while conference proceedings and monographs were disregarded. We used the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool to investigate the risk of bias. We synthesized our data in a table divided by the imaging modalities subgroups.

RESULTS

After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 43 works. This review examines the impact of preprocessing parameters on the reproducibility and reliability of radiomic features extracted from multimodality imaging (CT, MRI, CBCT, and PET/CT). Standardized preprocessing is crucial for consistent radiomic feature extraction. Key preprocessing steps include voxel resampling, normalization, and discretization, which influence feature robustness and reproducibility. In total, 44% of the included works studied the effects of an isotropic voxel resampling, and most studies opted to employ a discretization strategy. From 2021, several studies started selecting the best set of preprocessing parameters based on models' best performance. As for comparison metrics, ICC was the most used in MRI studies in 58% of the screened works.

CONCLUSIONS

From our work, we highlighted the need to harmonize the use of preprocessing parameters and their values, especially in light of future studies of prospective studies, which are still lacking in the current literature.

Comparing quantitative image parameters between animal and clinical CT-scanners: a translational phantom study analysis

Purpose

This study compares phantom-based variability of extracted radiomics features from scans on a photon counting CT (PCCT) and an experimental animal PET/CT-scanner (Albira II) to investigate the potential of radiomics for translation from animal models to human scans. While oncological basic research in animal PET/CT has allowed an intrinsic comparison between PET and CT, but no 1:1 translation to a human CT scanner due to resolution and noise limitations, Radiomics as a statistical and thus scale-independent method can potentially close the critical gap.

Methods

Two phantoms were scanned on a PCCT and animal PET/CT-scanner with different scan parameters and then the radiomics parameters were extracted. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted. To overcome the limitation of a small dataset, a data augmentation technique was applied. A Ridge Classifier was trained and a Feature Importance- and Cluster analysis was performed.

Results

PCA and Cluster Analysis shows a clear differentiation between phantom types while emphasizing the comparability of both scanners. The Ridge Classifier exhibited a strong training performance with 93% accuracy, but faced challenges in generalization with a test accuracy of 62%.

Conclusion

These results show that radiomics has great potential as a translational tool between animal models and human routine diagnostics, especially using the novel photon counting technique. This is another crucial step towards integration of radiomics analysis into clinical practice.

Explainable machine learning radiomics model for Primary Progressive Aphasia classification

Introduction

Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by linguistic impairment. The two main clinical subtypes are semantic (svPPA) and non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) variants. Diagnosing and classifying PPA patients represents a complex challenge that requires the integration of multimodal information, including clinical, biological, and radiological features. Structural neuroimaging can play a crucial role in aiding the differential diagnosis of PPA and constructing diagnostic support systems.

Methods

In this study, we conducted a white matter texture analysis on T1-weighted images, including 56 patients with PPA (31 svPPA and 25 nfvPPA), and 53 age- and sex-matched controls. We trained a tree-based algorithm over combined clinical/radiomics measures and used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) model to extract the greater impactful measures in distinguishing svPPA and nfvPPA patients from controls and each other.

Results

Radiomics-integrated classification models demonstrated an accuracy of 95% in distinguishing svPPA patients from controls and of 93.7% in distinguishing svPPA from nfvPPA. An accuracy of 93.7% was observed in differentiating nfvPPA patients from controls. Moreover, Shapley values showed the strong involvement of the white matter near left entorhinal cortex in patients classification models.

Discussion

Our study provides new evidence for the usefulness of radiomics features in classifying patients with svPPA and nfvPPA, demonstrating the effectiveness of an explainable machine learning approach in extracting the most impactful features for assessing PPA.

Performance and Dimensionality of Pretreatment MRI Radiomics in Rectal Carcinoma Chemoradiotherapy Prediction

(1) Background: This study aimed to develop a machine learning model based on radiomics of pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 3D T2W contrast sequence scans combined with clinical parameters (CP) to predict neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) response in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC). The study also assessed the impact of radiomics dimensionality on predictive performance. (2) Methods: Seventy-five patients were prospectively enrolled with clinicopathologically confirmed LARC and nCRT before surgery. Tumor properties were assessed by calculating 2141 radiomics features. Least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate regression were used for feature selection. (3) Results: Two predictive models were constructed, one starting from 72 CP and 107 radiomics features, and the other from 72 CP and 1862 radiomics features. The models revealed moderately advantageous impact of increased dimensionality, with their predictive respective AUCs of 0.86 and 0.90 in the entire cohort and 0.84 within validation folds. Both models outperformed the CP-only model (AUC = 0.80) which served as the benchmark for predictive performance without radiomics. (4) Conclusions: Predictive models developed in this study combining pretreatment MRI radiomics and clinicopathological features may potentially provide a routine clinical predictor of chemoradiotherapy responders, enabling clinicians to personalize treatment strategies for rectal carcinoma.