Efficacy of Immunohistochemistry for SDHB in the Screening of Hereditary Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma

SDHB immunohistochemistry for prognosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: A retrospective and prospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PCC/PGL) are rare neuroendocrine tumors and can secrete catecholamine. Previous studies have found that SDHB immunohistochemistry (IHC) can predict SDHB germline gene mutation, and SDHB mutation is closely associated with tumor progression and metastasis. This study aimed to clarify the potential effect of SDHB IHC as a predictive marker for tumor progression in PCC/PGL patients.

METHODS

We included PCC/PGL patients diagnosed in Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from 2002 to 2014 for retrospective analysis and discovered that SDHB (-) staining patients had poorer prognoses. Then we examined SDHB protein expression by IHC on all tumors in the prospective series, which was composed of patients from 2015 to 2020 in our center.

RESULTS

In the retrospective series, the median follow-up was 167 months, and during follow-up, 14.4% (38/264) patients developed metastasis or recurrence, and 8.0% (22/274) patients died. Retrospective analysis revealed that 66.7% (6/9) of participants in the SDHB (-) group and 15.7% (40/255) of those in the SDHB (+) group developed progressive tumors (OR: 10.75, 95% CI: 2.72-52.60, P=0.001), and SDHB (-) was independently associated with poor outcomes after adjusting by other clinicopathological parameters (OR: 11.68, 95% CI: 2.58-64.45, P=0.002). SDHB (-) patients had shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (P<0.001) and SDHB (-) was significantly associated with shorter median DFS (HR: 6.89, 95% CI: 2.41-19.70, P<0.001) in multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis. In the prospective series, the median follow-up was 28 months, 4.7% (10/213) patients developed metastasis or recurrence, and 0.5% (1/217) patient died. For the prospective analysis, 18.8% (3/16) of participants in the SDHB (-) group had progressive tumors compared with 3.6% (7/197) in the SDHB (+) group (RR: 5.28, 95% CI: 1.51-18.47, P=0.009), statistical significance remained (RR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.20-9.38, P=0.021) after adjusting for other clinicopathological factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated patients with SDHB (-) tumors had a higher possibility of poor outcomes, and SDHB IHC can be regarded as an independent biomarker of prognosis in PCC/PGL.

Value of Immunohistochemical Expression of Apelin, Succinate Dehydrogenase B, Chromogranin B, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2, Contactin 4, and Succinyl-CoA Synthetase Subunit Beta in Differentiating Metastatic From Non-Metastatic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to retrospectively collect pathologically identified pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) tumor tissues from our center and investigate the expression of apelin and succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit beta (SUCLG2), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2 or ERBB-2), contactin 4 (CNTN4), chromogranin B (CHGB), and succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB) in metastatic and non-metastatic PPGLs, for exploring their roles in the diagnosis of metastatic PPGLs.

METHODS

A total of 369 patients with pathologically and surgically confirmed PPGLs at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, between June 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively included. Sixty patients-12 patients with metastatic PPGLs and 48 patients with non-metastatic PPGLs-were selected through propensity score matching (1:4) to reduce the effect of PPGL type, sex, and age. We observed and quantified the expression of apelin, SDHB, CHGB, ERBB-2, CNTN4, and SUCLG2 in paraffin-embedded samples using immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the metastatic group and non-metastatic group with respect to the expression of CNTN4 and SUCLG2. The expression of apelin, SDHB, CHGB, and ERBB-2 was significantly different between the two groups. The expression of apelin, SDHB, and CHGB was significantly lower in the metastatic group than that in the non-metastatic group (P < 0.001). ERBB-2 expression was significantly higher in the metastatic group than in the non-metastatic group (P = 0.042). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with negative expression of apelin, SDHB, and CHGB showed significantly lower metastasis-free survival than those with positive expression. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that SDHB and CHGB levels were independently associated with metastasis-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The expression levels of apelin, CHGB, SDHB, and ERBB-2 may be predictive biomarkers for the diagnosis of metastatic PPGLs. Patients with negative expression of apelin, CHGB, and SDHB should be subjected to frequent postoperative follow-up procedures.