Feasibility of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in Differentiation of Benign Parotid Gland Tumors

Characterization of parotid gland tumors: Whole-tumor histogram analysis of diffusion weighted imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging, and intravoxel incoherent motion - A pilot study

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of histogram features of diffusion parameters in characterizating parotid gland tumors.

METHOD

From December 2018 to January 2023, patients who underwent diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective study. The histogram features of diffusion parameters, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), diffusion coefficient (Dk), diffusion kurtosis (K), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (DP), and perfusion fraction (FP) were analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between benign parotid gland tumors (BPGTs) and malignant parotid gland tumors (MPGTs). Receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the differential diagnostic performance. The Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between diffusion parameters and Ki-67 labeling index.

RESULTS

For diffusion MRI, twenty-three histogram features of diffusion parameters showed significant differences between BPGTs and MPGTs (all P < 0.05). Compared with the DWI model, the IVIM model and combined model had better diagnostic specificity (58 %, 94 %, and 88 %, respectively; both corrected P < 0.001) and accuracy (64 %, 89 %, and 86 %, respectively; both corrected P = 0.006). The combined model was superior to the single DWI model with improved IDI (IDI improvement 0.25). Significant correlations were found between Ki-67 and ADCmean, Dkmean, Kmean, and Dmean (r = -0.57 to 0.53; all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-tumor histogram analysis of IVIM and combined diffusion model could further improve the diagnostic performance for differentiating BPGTs from MPGTs.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Histogram Analysis in Parotid Gland Tumors: Evaluating a Novel Approach for Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Parotid Lesions Based on Full Histogram Distributions

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of ADC distribution curves for differentiation between benign and malignant parotid gland tumors and to compare with mean ADC values. 73 patients with parotid gland tumors underwent head-and-neck MRI on a 1.5 Tesla scanner prior to surgery and histograms of ADC values were extracted. Histopathological results served as a reference standard for further analysis. ADC histograms were evaluated by comparing their similarity to a reference distribution using Chi2-test-statistics. The assumed reference distribution for benign and malignant parotid gland lesions was calculated after pooling the entire ADC data. In addition, mean ADC values were determined. For both methods, we calculated and compared the sensitivity and specificity between benign and malignant parotid gland tumors and three subgroups (pleomorphic adenoma, Warthin tumor, and malignant lesions), respectively. Moreover, we performed cross-validation (CV) techniques to estimate the predictive performance between ADC distributions and mean values. Histopathological results revealed 30 pleomorphic adenomas, 22 Warthin tumors, and 21 malignant tumors. ADC histogram distribution yielded a better specificity for detection of benign parotid gland lesions (ADChistogram: 75.0% vs. ADCmean: 71.2%), but mean ADC values provided a higher sensitivity (ADCmean: 71.4% vs. ADChistogram: 61.9%). The discrepancies are most pronounced in the differentiation between malignant and Warthin tumors (sensitivity ADCmean: 76.2% vs. ADChistogram: 61.9%; specificity ADChistogram: 81.8% vs. ADCmean: 68.2%). Using CV techniques, ADC distribution revealed consistently better accuracy to differentiate benign from malignant lesions (“leave-one-out CV” accuracy ADChistogram: 71.2% vs. ADCmean: 67.1%). ADC histogram analysis using full distribution curves is a promising new approach for differentiation between primary benign and malignant parotid gland tumors, especially with respect to the advantage in predictive performance based on CV techniques.