1
|
Puttini I, Kapalla M, Braune A, Michler E, Kröger J, Lutz B, Sakhalihasan N, Trenner M, Biro G, Weber W, Rössel T, Reeps C, Eckstein HH, Wolk S, Knappich C, Notohamiprodjo S, Busch A. Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infection-Patient Outcome Cannot Be Determined Based on Pre-Operative Characteristics. J Clin Med 2024; 13:269. [PMID: 38202276 PMCID: PMC10779700 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study investigates VGEI and patient characteristics, PET/CT quantification before surgical or conservative management of VGEI and post-intervention outcomes in order to identify patients who might benefit from such a procedure. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were quantitatively assessed and compared to a non-VGEI cohort. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and aortic reintervention-free survival at six months. Ninety-three patients (75% male, 65 ± 10 years, 82% operated) were included. The initial operation was mainly for aneurysm (67.7%: 31% EVAR, 12% TEVAR, 57% open aortic repair). Thirty-two patients presented with fistulae. PET SUVTLR (target-to-liver ratio) showed 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Replacement included silver-coated Dacron (21.3%), pericardium (61.3%) and femoral vein (17.3%), yet the material did not influence the overall survival (p = 0.745). In-hospital mortality did not differ between operative and conservative treatment (19.7% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.84). At six months, 50% of the operated cohort survived without aortic reintervention. Short- and midterm morbidity and mortality remained high after aortic graft removal. Neither preoperative characteristics nor the material used for reconstruction influenced the overall survival, and, with limitations, both the in-hospital and midterm survival were similar between the surgically and conservatively managed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Puttini
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Marvin Kapalla
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Anja Braune
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Enrico Michler
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Joselyn Kröger
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Brigitta Lutz
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Natzi Sakhalihasan
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Matthias Trenner
- Division of Vascular Medicine, St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Gabor Biro
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Rössel
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Reeps
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Hans-Henning Eckstein
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Wolk
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph Knappich
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Susan Notohamiprodjo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Albert Busch
- Department for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mestres C, Van Hemelrijck M, Quintana E, Smit FE. Significance and current approaches to vascular graft infection. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 39:333-340. [PMID: 38093914 PMCID: PMC10713901 DOI: 10.1007/s12055-023-01638-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a constant in cardiovascular surgery with published rates between 1 and 5%. Every graft type and anatomical location is a potential target for infectious complications. These patients are sick patients with high frailty burden. Management of VGEI entails a multidisciplinary and multimodality approach. Here we review some aspects of the problem of VGEI including prevention, diagnosis, and surgical therapy with focus on recent developments in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos–Alberto Mestres
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences and The Robert WM Frater Cardiovascular Research Centre, The University of the Free State, PO Box 339 (Internal Box G32), Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa
| | | | - Eduard Quintana
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francis Edwin Smit
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences and The Robert WM Frater Cardiovascular Research Centre, The University of the Free State, PO Box 339 (Internal Box G32), Bloemfontein, 9300 South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liesker DJ, Legtenberg S, Erba PA, Glaudemans AWJM, Zeebregts CJ, De Vries JPPM, Chakfé N, Saleem BR, Slart RHJA. Variability of [ 18F]FDG-PET/LDCT reporting in vascular graft and endograft infection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3880-3889. [PMID: 37507493 PMCID: PMC10611872 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06349-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low dose and/or contrast enhanced computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) scan reveals high sensitivity for the diagnosis of vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI), but lower specificity. Reporting [18F]FDG-PET/CT scans of suspected VGEI is challenging, reader dependent, and reporting standards are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate variability of [18F]FDG-PET/low dose CT (LDCT) reporting of suspected VGEI using a proposed standard reporting format. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients with a suspected VGEI (according to the MAGIC criteria) without need for urgent surgical treatment who underwent an additional [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan between 2006 and 2022 at a tertiary referral centre. All [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports were scored following pre-selected criteria that were formulated based on literature and experts in the field. The aim was to investigate the completeness of [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports for diagnosing VGEI (proven according to the MAGIC criteria) and to evaluate if incompleteness of reports influenced the diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS Hundred-fifty-two patients were included. Median diagnostic interval from the index vascular surgical procedure until [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT scan was 35.5 (7.3-73.3) months. Grafts were in 65.1% located centrally and 34.9% peripherally. Based on the pre-selected reporting criteria, 45.7% of the reports included all items. The least frequently assessed criterion was FDG-uptake pattern (40.6%). Overall, [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT showed a sensitivity of 91%, a specificity of 72%, and an accuracy of 88% when compared to the gold standard (diagnosed VGEI). Lower sensitivity and specificity in reports including ≤ 8 criteria compared to completely evaluated reports were found (83% and 50% vs. 92% and 77%, respectively). CONCLUSION Less than half of the [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT reports of suspected VGEI met all pre-selected criteria. Incompleteness of reports led to lower sensitivity and specificity. Implementing a recommendation with specific criteria for VGEI reporting is needed in the VGEI-guideline update. This study provides a first recommendation for a concise and complete [18F]FDG-PET/LDCT report in patients with suspected VGEI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Liesker
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Stijn Legtenberg
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paola A Erba
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul P M De Vries
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nabil Chakfé
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ben R Saleem
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Riemer H J A Slart
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Photonic Imaging, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|