Comparing Interfacial Trp, Interfacial His and pH Dependence for the Anchoring of Tilted Transmembrane Helical Peptides

Thermodynamics-Based Molecular Modeling of α-Helices in Membranes and Micelles

The Folding of Membrane-Associated Peptides (FMAP) method was developed for modeling α-helix formation by linear peptides in micelles and lipid bilayers. FMAP 2.0 identifies locations of α-helices in the amino acid sequence, generates their three-dimensional models in planar bilayers or spherical micelles, and estimates their thermodynamic stabilities and tilt angles, depending on temperature and pH. The method was tested for 723 peptides (926 data points) experimentally studied in different environments and for 170 single-pass transmembrane (TM) proteins with available crystal structures. FMAP 2.0 detected more than 95% of experimentally observed α-helices with an average error in helix end determination of around 2, 3, 4, and 5 residues per helix for peptides in water, micelles, bilayers, and TM proteins, respectively. Helical and nonhelical residue states were predicted with an accuracy from 0.86 to 0.96, and the Matthews correlation coefficient was from 0.64 to 0.88 depending on the environment. Experimental micelle- and membrane-binding energies and tilt angles of peptides were reproduced with a root-mean-square deviation of around 2 kcal/mol and 7°, respectively. The TM and non-TM states of hydrophobic and pH-triggered α-helical peptides in various lipid bilayers were reproduced in more than 95% of cases. The FMAP 2.0 web server (https://membranome.org/fmap) is publicly available to explore the structural polymorphism of antimicrobial, cell-penetrating, fusion, and other membrane-binding peptides, which is important for understanding the mechanisms of their biological activities.

Examination of pH dependency and orientation differences of membrane spanning alpha helices carrying a single or pair of buried histidine residues

We have employed the peptide framework of GWALP23 (acetyl-GGALWLALALALALALALWLAGA-amide) to examine the orientation, dynamics and pH dependence of peptides having buried single or pairs of histidine residues. When residue L8 is substituted to yield GWALP23-H⁸, acetyl-GGALWLAH⁸ALALALALALWLAGA-amide, the deuterium NMR spectra of ²H-labeled core alanine residues reveal a helix that occupies a single transmembrane orientation in DLPC, or in DMPC at low pH, yet shows multiple states at higher pH or in bilayers of DOPC. Moreover, a single histidine at position 8 or 16 in the GWALP23 framework is sensitive to pH. Titration points are observed near pH 3.5 for the deprotonation of H8 in lipid bilayers of DLPC or DMPC, and for H16 in DOPC. When residues L8 and L16 both are substituted to yield GWALP23-H^8,16, the ²H NMR spectra show, interestingly, no titration dependence from pH 2-8, yet bilayer thickness-dependent orientation differences. The helix with H8 and H16 is found to adopt a transmembrane orientation in thin bilayers of DLPC, a combination of transmembrane and surface orientations in DMPC, and then a complete transition to a surface bound orientation in the thicker DPoPC and DOPC lipid bilayers. In the surface orientations, alanine A7 no longer fits within the core helix. These results along with previous studies with different locations of histidine residues suggest that lipid hydrophobic thickness is a first determinant and pH a second determinant for the helical orientation, along with possible side-chain snorkeling, when the His residues are incorporated into the hydrophobic region of a lipid membrane-associated helix.