Compositional Bias of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Regions and Their Predictions

Taxonomy-specific assessment of intrinsic disorder predictions at residue and region levels in higher eukaryotes, protists, archaea, bacteria and viruses

Intrinsic disorder predictors were evaluated in several studies including the two large CAID experiments. However, these studies are biased towards eukaryotic proteins and focus primarily on the residue-level predictions. We provide first-of-its-kind assessment that comprehensively covers the taxonomy and evaluates predictions at the residue and disordered region levels. We curate a benchmark dataset that uniformly covers eukaryotic, archaeal, bacterial, and viral proteins. We find that predictive performance differs substantially across taxonomy, where viruses are predicted most accurately, followed by protists and higher eukaryotes, while bacterial and archaeal proteins suffer lower levels of accuracy. These trends are consistent across predictors. We also find that current tools, except for flDPnn, struggle with reproducing native distributions of the numbers and sizes of the disordered regions. Moreover, analysis of two variants of disorder predictions derived from the AlphaFold2 predicted structures reveals that they produce accurate residue-level propensities for archaea, bacteria and protists. However, they underperform for higher eukaryotes and generally struggle to accurately identify disordered regions. Our results motivate development of new predictors that target bacteria and archaea and which produce accurate results at both residue and region levels. We also stress the need to include the region-level assessments in future assessments.

Identification of Low-Complexity Domains by Compositional Signatures Reveals Class-Specific Frequencies and Functions Across the Domains of Life

Low-complexity domains (LCDs) in proteins are typically enriched in one or two predominant amino acids. As a result, LCDs often exhibit unusual structural/biophysical tendencies and can occupy functional niches. However, for each organism, protein sequences must be compatible with intracellular biomolecules and physicochemical environment, both of which vary from organism to organism. This raises the possibility that LCDs may occupy sequence spaces in select organisms that are otherwise prohibited in most organisms. Here, we report a comprehensive survey and functional analysis of LCDs in all known reference proteomes (>21k organisms), with added focus on rare and unusual types of LCDs. LCDs were classified according to both the primary amino acid and secondary amino acid in each LCD sequence, facilitating detailed comparisons of LCD class frequencies across organisms. Examination of LCD classes at different depths (i.e., domain of life, organism, protein, and per-residue levels) reveals unique facets of LCD frequencies and functions. To our surprise, all 400 LCD classes occur in nature, although some are exceptionally rare. A number of rare classes can be defined for each domain of life, with many LCD classes appearing to be eukaryote-specific. Certain LCD classes were consistently associated with identical functions across many organisms, particularly in eukaryotes. Our analysis methods enable simultaneous, direct comparison of all LCD classes between individual organisms, resulting in a proteome-scale view of differences in LCD frequencies and functions. Together, these results highlight the remarkable diversity and functional specificity of LCDs across all known life forms.

Systematic identification of 20S proteasome substrates

For years, proteasomal degradation was predominantly attributed to the ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway. However, it is now evident that the core 20S proteasome can independently target proteins for degradation. With approximately half of the cellular proteasomes comprising free 20S complexes, this degradation mechanism is not rare. Identifying 20S-specific substrates is challenging due to the dual-targeting of some proteins to either 20S or 26S proteasomes and the non-specificity of proteasome inhibitors. Consequently, knowledge of 20S proteasome substrates relies on limited hypothesis-driven studies. To comprehensively explore 20S proteasome substrates, we employed advanced mass spectrometry, along with biochemical and cellular analyses. This systematic approach revealed hundreds of 20S proteasome substrates, including proteins undergoing specific N- or C-terminal cleavage, possibly for regulation. Notably, these substrates were enriched in RNA- and DNA-binding proteins with intrinsically disordered regions, often found in the nucleus and stress granules. Under cellular stress, we observed reduced proteolytic activity in oxidized proteasomes, with oxidized protein substrates exhibiting higher structural disorder compared to unmodified proteins. Overall, our study illuminates the nature of 20S substrates, offering crucial insights into 20S proteasome biology.

Protein structure-function continuum model: Emerging nexuses between specificity, evolution, and structure

The rationale for replacing the old binary of structure-function with the trinity of structure, disorder, and function has gained considerable ground in recent years. A continuum model based on the expanded form of the existing paradigm can now subsume importance of both conformational flexibility and intrinsic disorder in protein function. The disorder is actually critical for understanding the protein-protein interactions in many regulatory processes, formation of membrane-less organelles, and our revised notions of specificity as amply illustrated by moonlighting proteins. While its importance in formation of amyloids and function of prions is often discussed, the roles of intrinsic disorder in infectious diseases and protein function under extreme conditions are also becoming clear. This review is an attempt to discuss how our current understanding of protein function, specificity, and evolution fit better with the continuum model. This integration of structure and disorder under a single model may bring greater clarity in our continuing quest for understanding proteins and molecular mechanisms of their functionality.

CoMemMoRFPred: Sequence-based Prediction of MemMoRFs by Combining Predictors of Intrinsic Disorder, MoRFs and Disordered Lipid-binding Regions

Molecular recognition features (MoRFs) are a commonly occurring type of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that undergo disorder-to-order transition upon binding to partner molecules. We focus on recently characterized and functionally important membrane-binding MoRFs (MemMoRFs). Motivated by the lack of computational tools that predict MemMoRFs, we use a dataset of experimentally annotated MemMoRFs to conceptualize, design, evaluate and release an accurate sequence-based predictor. We rely on state-of-the-art tools that predict residues that possess key characteristics of MemMoRFs, such as intrinsic disorder, disorder-to-order transition and lipid-binding. We identify and combine results from three tools that include flDPnn for the disorder prediction, DisoLipPred for the prediction of disordered lipid-binding regions, and MoRFCHiBiLight for the prediction of disorder-to-order transitioning protein binding regions. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that combining results produced by these three methods generates accurate predictions of MemMoRFs. We also show that use of a smoothing operator produces predictions that closely mimic the number and sizes of the native MemMoRF regions. The resulting CoMemMoRFPred method is available as an easy-to-use webserver at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/CoMemMoRFPred. This tool will aid future studies of MemMoRFs in the context of exploring their abundance, cellular functions, and roles in pathologic phenomena.

Tutorial: a guide for the selection of fast and accurate computational tools for the prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins

Intrinsic disorder is instrumental for a wide range of protein functions, and its analysis, using computational predictions from primary structures, complements secondary and tertiary structure-based approaches. In this Tutorial, we provide an overview and comparison of 23 publicly available computational tools with complementary parameters useful for intrinsic disorder prediction, partly relying on results from the Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction experiment. We consider factors such as accuracy, runtime, availability and the need for functional insights. The selected tools are available as web servers and downloadable programs, offer state-of-the-art predictions and can be used in a high-throughput manner. We provide examples and instructions for the selected tools to illustrate practical aspects related to the submission, collection and interpretation of predictions, as well as the timing and their limitations. We highlight two predictors for intrinsically disordered proteins, flDPnn as accurate and fast and IUPred as very fast and moderately accurate, while suggesting ANCHOR2 and MoRFchibi as two of the best-performing predictors for intrinsically disordered region binding. We link these tools to additional resources, including databases of predictions and web servers that integrate multiple predictive methods. Altogether, this Tutorial provides a hands-on guide to comparatively evaluating multiple predictors, submitting and collecting their own predictions, and reading and interpreting results. It is suitable for experimentalists and computational biologists interested in accurately and conveniently identifying intrinsic disorder, facilitating the functional characterization of the rapidly growing collections of protein sequences.

Per Aspera ad Chaos: Vladimir Uversky's Odyssey through the Strange World of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Until the late 1990s, we believed that protein function required a unique, well-defined 3D structure encrypted in the amino acid sequence [...].

Comparative evaluation of AlphaFold2 and disorder predictors for prediction of intrinsic disorder, disorder content and fully disordered proteins

We expand studies of AlphaFold2 (AF2) in the context of intrinsic disorder prediction by comparing it against a broad selection of 20 accurate, popular and recently released disorder predictors. We use 25% larger benchmark dataset with 646 proteins and cover protein-level predictions of disorder content and fully disordered proteins. AF2-based disorder predictions secure a relatively high Area Under receiver operating characteristic Curve (AUC) of 0.77 and are statistically outperformed by several modern disorder predictors that secure AUCs around 0.8 with median runtime of about 20 s compared to 1200 s for AF2. Moreover, AF2 provides modestly accurate predictions of fully disordered proteins (F1 = 0.59 vs. 0.91 for the best disorder predictor) and disorder content (mean absolute error of 0.21 vs. 0.15). AF2 also generates statistically more accurate disorder predictions for about 20% of proteins that have relatively short sequences and a few disordered regions that tend to be located at the sequence termini, and which are absent of disordered protein-binding regions. Interestingly, AF2 and the most accurate disorder predictors rely on deep neural networks, suggesting that these models are useful for protein structure and disorder predictions.

Overview Update: Computational Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder in Proteins

There are over 100 computational predictors of intrinsic disorder. These methods predict amino acid-level propensities for disorder directly from protein sequences. The propensities can be used to annotate putative disordered residues and regions. This unit provides a practical and holistic introduction to the sequence-based intrinsic disorder prediction. We define intrinsic disorder, explain the format of computational prediction of disorder, and identify and describe several accurate predictors. We also introduce recently released databases of intrinsic disorder predictions and use an illustrative example to provide insights into how predictions should be interpreted and combined. Lastly, we summarize key experimental methods that can be used to validate computational predictions. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

DEPICTER2: a comprehensive webserver for intrinsic disorder and disorder function prediction

Intrinsic disorder in proteins is relatively abundant in nature and essential for a broad spectrum of cellular functions. While disorder can be accurately predicted from protein sequences, as it was empirically demonstrated in recent community-organized assessments, it is rather challenging to collect and compile a comprehensive prediction that covers multiple disorder functions. To this end, we introduce the DEPICTER2 (DisorderEd PredictIon CenTER) webserver that offers convenient access to a curated collection of fast and accurate disorder and disorder function predictors. This server includes a state-of-the-art disorder predictor, flDPnn, and five modern methods that cover all currently predictable disorder functions: disordered linkers and protein, peptide, DNA, RNA and lipid binding. DEPICTER2 allows selection of any combination of the six methods, batch predictions of up to 25 proteins per request and provides interactive visualization of the resulting predictions. The webserver is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/DEPICTER2/.

Computational prediction of disordered binding regions

One of the key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is their ability to interact with a broad range of partner molecules. Multiple types of interacting IDRs were identified including molecular recognition fragments (MoRFs), short linear sequence motifs (SLiMs), and protein-, nucleic acids- and lipid-binding regions. Prediction of binding IDRs in protein sequences is gaining momentum in recent years. We survey 38 predictors of binding IDRs that target interactions with a diverse set of partners, such as peptides, proteins, RNA, DNA and lipids. We offer a historical perspective and highlight key events that fueled efforts to develop these methods. These tools rely on a diverse range of predictive architectures that include scoring functions, regular expressions, traditional and deep machine learning and meta-models. Recent efforts focus on the development of deep neural network-based architectures and extending coverage to RNA, DNA and lipid-binding IDRs. We analyze availability of these methods and show that providing implementations and webservers results in much higher rates of citations/use. We also make several recommendations to take advantage of modern deep network architectures, develop tools that bundle predictions of multiple and different types of binding IDRs, and work on algorithms that model structures of the resulting complexes.

CLIP: accurate prediction of disordered linear interacting peptides from protein sequences using co-evolutionary information

One of key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is facilitation of protein-protein and protein-nucleic acids interactions. These disordered binding regions include molecular recognition features (MoRFs), short linear motifs (SLiMs) and longer binding domains. Vast majority of current predictors of disordered binding regions target MoRFs, with a handful of methods that predict SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. A new and broader class of disordered binding regions, linear interacting peptides (LIPs), was introduced recently and applied in the MobiDB resource. LIPs are segments in protein sequences that undergo disorder-to-order transition upon binding to a protein or a nucleic acid, and they cover MoRFs, SLiMs and disordered protein-binding domains. Although current predictors of MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions could be used to identify some LIPs, there are no dedicated sequence-based predictors of LIPs. To this end, we introduce CLIP, a new predictor of LIPs that utilizes robust logistic regression model to combine three complementary types of inputs: co-evolutionary information derived from multiple sequence alignments, physicochemical profiles and disorder predictions. Ablation analysis suggests that the co-evolutionary information is particularly useful for this prediction and that combining the three inputs provides substantial improvements when compared to using these inputs individually. Comparative empirical assessments using low-similarity test datasets reveal that CLIP secures area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8 and substantially improves over the results produced by the closest current tools that predict MoRFs and disordered protein-binding regions. The webserver of CLIP is freely available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/CLIP/ and the standalone code can be downloaded from http://yanglab.qd.sdu.edu.cn/download/CLIP/.

DeepPRObind: Modular Deep Learner that Accurately Predicts Structure and Disorder-Annotated Protein Binding Residues

Current sequence-based predictors of protein-binding residues (PBRs) belong to two distinct categories: structure-trained vs. intrinsic disorder-trained. Since disordered PBRs differ from structured PBRs in several ways, including ability to bind multiple partners by folding into different conformations and enrichment in different amino acids, the structure-trained and disorder-trained predictors were shown to provide inaccurate results for the other annotation type. A simple consensus-based solution that combines structure- and disorder-trained methods provides limited levels of predictive performance and generates relatively many cross-predictions, where residues that interact with other ligand types are predicted as PBRs. We address this unsolved problem by designing a novel and fast deep-learner, DeepPRObind, that relies on carefully designed modular convolutional architecture and uses innovative aggregate input features. Comparative empirical tests on a low-similarity test dataset reveal that DeepPRObind generates accurate predictions of structured and disordered PBRs and low amounts of cross-predictions, outperforming a comprehensive collection of 12 predictors of PBRs. Given the relatively low runtime of DeepPRObind (40 seconds per protein), we further validate its results based on an analysis of putative PBRs in the yeast proteome, confirming that interactions in disordered regions are enriched among hub proteins. We release DeepPRObind as a convenient web server at https://www.csuligroup.com/DeepPRObind/.