Viriforms-A New Category of Classifiable Virus-Derived Genetic Elements

Gene transfer agents: structural and functional properties of domesticated viruses

Horizontal exchange of DNA between bacteria and archaea is prevalent and has major potential implications for genome evolution, plasticity, and population fitness. Several transfer mechanisms have been identified, including gene transfer agents (GTAs). GTAs are intricately regulated domesticated viruses that package host DNA into virus-like capsids and transfer this DNA throughout the bacterial community. Several important advances have recently been made in our understanding of these unusual particles. In this review, we highlight some of these findings, primarily for the model GTA produced by Rhodobacter capsulatus but also for newly identified GTA producers. We provide key insights into these important genetic elements, including the differences between GTAs from their ancestral bacteriophages, their regulation and control, and their elusive evolutionary function.

Gene transfer agents: The ambiguous role of selfless viruses in genetic exchange and bacterial evolution

Gene transfer agents (GTAs) are genetic elements derived from ancestral bacteriophages that have become domesticated by the host. GTAs are present in diverse prokaryotic organisms, where they can facilitate horizontal gene transfer under certain conditions. Unlike typical bacteriophages, GTAs do not exhibit any preference for the replication or transfer of the genes encoding them; instead, they exhibit a remarkable capacity to package chromosomal, and sometimes extrachromosomal, DNA into virus-like capsids and disseminate it to neighboring cells. Because GTAs resemble defective prophages, identification of novel GTAs is not trivial. The detection of candidates relies on the genetic similarity to known GTAs, which has been fruitful in α-proteobacterial lineages but challenging in more distant bacteria. Here we consider several fundamental questions: What is the true prevalence of GTAs in prokaryote genomes? Given there are high costs for GTA production, what advantage do GTAs provide to the bacterial host to justify their maintenance? How is the bacterial chromosome recognized and processed for inclusion in GTA particles? This article highlights the challenges in comprehensively understanding GTAs' prevalence, function and DNA packaging method. Going forward, broad study of atypical GTAs and use of ecologically relevant conditions are required to uncover their true impact on bacterial chromosome evolution.

Virome profiling of fig wasps (Ceratosolen spp.) reveals virus diversity spanning four realms

We investigated the virome of agaonid fig wasps (Ceratosolen spp.) inside syconia ("fruits") of various Ficus trees fed upon by frugivores such as pteropodid bats in Sub-Saharan Africa. This virome includes representatives of viral families spanning four realms and includes near-complete genome sequences of three novel viruses and fragments of five additional potentially novel viruses evolutionarily associated with insects, fungi, plants, and vertebrates. Our study provides evidence that frugivorous animals are exposed to a plethora of viruses by coincidental consumption of fig wasps, which are obligate pollinators of figs worldwide.

Co-evolution of gene transfer agents and their alphaproteobacterial hosts

Gene transfer agents (GTAs) are enigmatic elements that resemble small viruses and are known to be produced during nutritional stress by some bacteria and archaea. The production of GTAs is regulated by quorum sensing, under which a small fraction of the population acts as GTA producers, while the rest becomes GTA recipients. In contrast to canonical viruses, GTAs cannot propagate themselves because they package pieces of the producing cell's genome. In alphaproteobacteria, GTAs are mostly vertically inherited and reside in their hosts' genomes for hundreds of millions of years. While GTAs' ability to transfer genetic material within a population and their long-term preservation suggest an increased fitness of GTA-producing microbes, the associated benefits and type of selection that maintains GTAs are poorly understood. By comparing rates of evolutionary change in GTA genes to the rates in gene families abundantly present across 293 alphaproteobacterial genomes, we detected 59 gene families that likely co-evolve with GTA genes. These gene families are predominantly involved in stress response, DNA repair, and biofilm formation. We hypothesize that biofilm formation enables the physical proximity of GTA-producing cells, limiting GTA-derived benefits only to a group of closely related cells. We further conjecture that the population structure of biofilm-forming sub-populations ensures that the trait of GTA production is maintained despite the inevitable rise of "cheating" genotypes. Because release of GTA particles kills the producing cell, maintenance of GTAs is an exciting example of social evolution in a microbial population.IMPORTANCEGene transfer agents (GTAs) are viruses domesticated by some archaea and bacteria as vehicles for carrying pieces of the host genome. Produced under certain environmental conditions, GTA particles can deliver DNA to neighboring, closely related cells. The function of GTAs remains uncertain. While making GTAs is suicidal for a cell, GTA-encoding genes are widespread in genomes of alphaproteobacteria. Such GTA persistence implies functional benefits but raises questions about how selection maintains this lethal trait. By showing that GTA genes co-evolve with genes involved in stress response, DNA repair, and biofilm formation, we provide support for the hypothesis that GTAs facilitate DNA exchange during the stress conditions and present a model for how GTAs persist in biofilm-forming bacterial populations despite being lethal.