Relative Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Alone or in Combination with Noninjective Treatments on Pain and Physical Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Scoping Review of Network Meta-Analyses

BACKGROUND

 Although an increasing number of network meta-analyses have been conducted on the effectiveness of conservative therapy for knee osteoarthritis, these may have been poorly planned and executed.We aimed to review the qualities of a comprehensive set of network meta-analyses on rehabilitation therapies for knee osteoarthritis and provide an overview of the effectiveness of each therapy.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) conservative rehabilitation was the primary treatment in the intervention group, (ii) included patients were diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis, and (iii) patient groups were aged ≤75 years, and rehabilitation interventions comprised exercise, orthotic, or physical therapies or patient education. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of the identified records and selected the eligible reviews; their full texts were further assessed for eligibility. Then, a checklist derived from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for the reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare Interventions was used to validate the completeness of the reporting of each network meta-analysis. Furthermore, the statistical and outcome data regarding the quality of life, knee joint function and pain, adverse events, and physical functions were extracted using a customized spreadsheet.

RESULTS

Overall, 2701 titles and abstracts were screened, and eight network meta-analyses were ultimately selected. Nearly all reviews adequately addressed the PRISMA extension checklist, and the completeness of reporting was adequate; therefore, all expected information could be extracted. However, the methodology used to confirm the transitivity assumption was insufficient in many reviews. The following interventions were effective in reducing pain and improving physical function: (i) strengthening, flexibility, aerobic, and mind-body exercises, (ii) pulsed ultrasound, (iii) focused and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and (iv) continuous ultrasound. The following interventions were effective in improving the quality of life: (i) strengthening, (ii) mixed, and (iii) mind-body exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that exercise therapies, including muscle-strengthening, aerobic, flexibility, and mind-body exercises, are likely to be effective for pain relief and functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis. This may be the first review to provide a comprehensive perspective for considering priorities for future rehabilitation interventions for knee osteoarthritis.

Purines and Adenosine Receptors in Osteoarthritis

OA is a common and debilitating condition that restricts mobility and diminishes the quality of life. Recent work indicates that the generation of adenosine at the cell surface is an important mediator of chondrocyte homeostasis, and topical application of adenosine in a slow-release form (liposomes) can halt the progression of OA and diminish the pain associated with OA. Here, we review the evidence indicating that adenosine, acting at A2A receptors, plays a critical role in endogenous and exogenous treatment and reversal of OA.

Effects of single and repeated shock wave application on the osteogenic differentiation potential of human primary mesenchymal stromal cells and the osteoblastic cell line MG63 in vitro

Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is a non-invasive and effective option for treating various musculoskeletal disorders. Recent literature indicates that the parameters for extracorporeal shock wave therapy, such as the optimal intensity, treatment frequency, and localization, are yet to be determined. Studies reporting on the effects of shock wave application on primary mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as well as osteoblastic cell lines in vitro are barely available and not standardized. Methods: In this study, we designed a special setup to precisely expose primary MSCs and the osteoblastic cell line MG63 to shock waves and subsequently analyzed the resulting cellular responses using standardized protocols to investigate their viability, proliferation behavior, cytokine secretion, and osteogenic differentiation potential in vitro. The shock wave transducer was coupled to a specifically designed water bath containing a 5 mL tube holder. Primary human MSCs and MG63 cells were trypsinated and centrifuged in a 5 mL tube and exposed to single and repeated shock wave application using different intensities and numbers of pulses. Results: Single treatment of MSCs using intensities 5, 10, 15, and 20 and pulse numbers 100, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 at a constant pulse repetition frequency of 1 Hz resulted in a decreased viability and proliferation of both cell types with an increase in the intensity and number of pulses compared to controls. No significant difference in the osteogenic differentiation was observed at different time intervals in both cell types when a single shock wave application was performed. However, repeated shock wave sessions over three consecutive days of primary MSCs using low intensity levels 0.1 and 1 showed significant osteogenic differentiation 4-fold higher than that of the extracted Alizarin Red S at day 14, whereas MG63 cells showed no significant osteogenic differentiation compared to their corresponding controls. More specifically, repeated shock wave application triggered a significant downregulation of COL1A1, upregulation of RUNX2, and sustained increase of OCN in primary MSCs but not in the cell line MG63 when induced toward the osteogenic differentiation. Discussion: The effects of shock wave application on MSCs make it an effective therapy in regenerative medicine. We established a protocol to analyze a standardized shock wave application on MSCs and were able to determine conditions that enhance the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in vitro.

Multiple Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials

In recent years, various clinical trials have focused on treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, compared with the multiple hyaluronic acid (m-HA) injections, the clinical efficacy of multiple PRP (m-PRP) injections for KOA still remains controversial among these studies. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of m-PRP injections with m-HA injections in the treatment of KOA in this systematic review. Relevant clinical trials were searched via bibliographic databases, including Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, to compare the m-PRP and m-HA injections in the treatment of KOA. Finally, fourteen randomized controlled trials, including 1512 patients, showed the postoperative VAS, WOMAC, IKDC, or EQ-VAS scores and were enrolled in this systematic review. Compared with the group of intra-articular m-HA injections, the group of intra-articular m-PRP injections was lower in the VAS scores at 3-month (WMD = −0.25; 95%CI, −0.40 to −0.10, p = 0.0009) and 12-month (WMD = −0.64; 95%CI, −0.79 to −0.49, p < 0.00001) follow-ups. In addition, the group of intra-articular m-PRP injections was also lower in the WOMAC scores at 1-month (WMD = −1.23; 95%CI, −2.17 to −0.29, p = 0.01), 3-month (WMD = −5.34; 95%CI, −10.41 to −0.27, p = 0.04), 6-month (WMD = −11.02; 95%CI, −18.09 to −3.95, p = 0.002), and 12-month (WMD = −7.69; 95%CI, −12.86 to −2.52, p = 0.004) follow-ups. Furthermore, compared with the group of intra-articular m-HA injections, the group of intra-articular m-PRP injections was higher in the IKDC scores at 3-month (WMD = 7.45; 95%CI, 2.50 to 12.40, p = 0.003) and 6-month (WMD = 5.06; 95%CI, 1.94 to 8.18, p = 0.001) follow-ups. However, the long-term adverse side of m-PRP injections for KOA still needs more large-scale trials and long-term follow-ups.