Comprehensive Etiologic Analyses in Pediatric Cochlear Implantees and the Clinical Implications

Application of Genetic Information to Cochlear Implantation in Clinical Practice

Cochlear implantation is currently the treatment of choice for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHI). However, the outcomes with cochlear implant (CI) vary significantly among recipients. Genetic diagnosis offers direct clues regarding the pathogenesis of SNHI, which facilitates the development of personalized medicine for potential candidates for CI. In this article, I present a comprehensive overview of the usefulness of genetic information in clinical decision-making for CI. Genetically confirmed diagnosis enables clinicians to: 1) monitor the evolution of SNHI and determine the optimal surgical timing, 2) predict the potential benefits of CI in patients with identified genetic etiology, and 3) select CI devices/electrodes tailored to patients with specific genetic mutations.

Novel compound heterozygous MYO15A splicing variants in autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss

BACKGROUND

Hereditary hearing loss is a highly heterogeneous disorder. This study aimed to identify the genetic cause of a Chinese family with autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss (ARNSHL).

METHODS

Clinical information and peripheral blood samples were collected from the proband and its parents. Two-step high-throughput next-generation sequencing on the Ion Torrent platform was applied to detect variants as follows. First, long-range PCR was performed to amplify all the regions of the GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 genes, followed by next-generation sequencing. If no candidate pathogenetic variants were found, the targeted exon sequencing with AmpliSeq technology was employed to examine another 64 deafness-associated genes. Sanger sequencing was used to identify variants and the lineage co-segregation. The splicing of the MYO15A gene was assessed by in silico bioinformatics prediction and minigene assays.

RESULTS

Two candidate MYO15A gene (OMIM, #602,666) heterozygous splicing variants, NG_011634.2 (NM_016239.3): c.6177 + 1G > T and c.9690 + 1G > A, were identified in the proband, and these two variants were both annotated as pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Further bioinformatic analysis predicted that the c.6177 + 1G > T variant might cause exon skipping and that the c.9690 + 1G > A variant might activate a cryptic splicing donor site in the downstream intronic region. An in vitro minigene assay confirmed the above predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a compound heterozygous splicing variant in the MYO15A gene in a Han Chinese family with ARNSHL. Our results broaden the spectrum of MYO15A variants, potentially benefiting the early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the disease.

Genetic Underpinnings and Audiological Characteristics in Children With Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USNHL) is a condition commonly encountered in otolaryngology clinics. However, its molecular pathogenesis remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the genetic underpinnings of childhood USNHL and analyze the associated audiological features.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

METHODS

We enrolled 38 children with USNHL between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and performed physical, audiological, imaging, and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) examinations as well as genetic testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting 30 deafness genes. The audiological results were compared across different etiologies.

RESULTS

Causative genetic variants were identified in 8 (21.1%) patients, including 5 with GJB2 variants, 2 with PAX3 variants, and 1 with the EDNRB variant. GJB2 variants were found to be associated with mild-to-moderate USNHL in various audiogram configurations, whereas PAX3 and EDNRB variants were associated with profound USNHL in flat audiogram configurations. In addition, whole-genome sequencing and extended NGS targeting 213 deafness genes were performed in 2 multiplex families compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance; yet no definite causative variants were identified. Cochlear nerve deficiency and cCMV infection were observed in 9 and 2, respectively, patients without definite genetic diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Genetic underpinnings can contribute to approximately 20% of childhood USNHL, and different genotypes are associated with various audiological features. These findings highlight the utility of genetic examinations in guiding the diagnosis, counseling, and treatment of USNHL in children.

The natural history, clinical outcomes, and genotype-phenotype relationship of otoferlin-related hearing loss: a systematic, quantitative literature review

Congenital hearing loss affects one in 500 newborns. Sequence variations in OTOF, which encodes the calcium-binding protein otoferlin, are responsible for 1-8% of congenital, nonsyndromic hearing loss and are the leading cause of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders. The natural history of otoferlin-related hearing loss, the relationship between OTOF genotype and hearing loss phenotype, and the outcomes of clinical practices in patients with this genetic disorder are incompletely understood because most analyses have reported on small numbers of cases with homogeneous OTOF genotypes. Here, we present the first systematic, quantitative literature review of otoferlin-related hearing loss, which analyzes patient-specific data from 422 individuals across 61 publications. While most patients display a typical phenotype of severe-to-profound hearing loss with prelingual onset, 10-15% of patients display atypical phenotypes, including mild-to-moderate, progressive, and temperature-sensitive hearing loss. Patients' phenotypic presentations appear to depend on their specific genotypes. For example, non-truncating variants located in and immediately downstream of the C2E calcium-binding domain are more likely to produce atypical phenotypes. Additionally, the prevalence of certain sequence variants and their associated phenotypes varies between populations due to evolutionary founder effects. Our analyses also suggest otoacoustic emissions are less common in older patients and those with two truncating OTOF variants. Critically, our review has implications for the application and limitations of clinical practices, including newborn hearing screenings, hearing aid trials, cochlear implants, and upcoming gene therapy clinical trials. We conclude by discussing the limitations of available research and recommendations for future studies on this genetic cause of hearing loss.

Revisiting Genetic Epidemiology with a Refined Targeted Gene Panel for Hereditary Hearing Impairment in the Taiwanese Population

Hearing impairment is one of the most common sensory disorders in children, and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic examinations can assist in its prognostication and management. In 2020, we developed a simplified 30-gene NGS panel from the original 214-gene NGS version based on Taiwanese genetic epidemiology data to increase the accessibility of NGS-based examinations. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the 30-gene NGS panel and compared it with that of the original 214-gene NGS panel in patient subgroups with different clinical features. Data on the clinical features, genetic etiologies, audiological profiles, and outcomes were collected from 350 patients who underwent NGS-based genetic examinations for idiopathic bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment between 2020 and 2022. The overall diagnostic yield was 52%, with slight differences in genetic etiology between patients with different degrees of hearing impairment and ages of onset. No significant difference was found in the diagnostic yields between the two panels, regardless of clinical features, except for a lower detection rate of the 30-gene panel in the late-onset group. For patients with negative genetic results, where the causative variant is undetectable on current NGS-based methods, part of the negative results may be due to genes not covered by the panel or yet to be identified. In such cases, the hearing prognosis varies and may decline over time, necessitating appropriate follow-up and consultation. In conclusion, genetic etiologies can serve as references for refining targeted NGS panels with satisfactory diagnostic performance.