Artificial Intelligence Assisted Computational Tomographic Detection of Lung Nodules for Prognostic Cancer Examination: A Large-Scale Clinical Trial

Performance of Lung-Nodule Computer-Aided Detection Systems on Standard-Dose and Low-Dose Pediatric CT Scans: An Intraindividual Comparison

Background: When applying lung-nodule computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for pediatric CT, performance may be degraded on low-dose scans due to increased image noise. Objective: To conduct an intraindividual comparison of the performance for lung nodule detection of two CAD systems trained using adult data between low-dose and standard-dose pediatric chest CT scans. Methods: This retrospective study included 73 patients (32 female, 41 male; mean age, 14.7 years; age range, 4-20 years) who underwent both clinical standard-dose and investigational low-dose chest CT examinations within the same encounter from November 30, 2018 to August 31, 2020 as part of an earlier prospective study. Fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists annotated lung nodules to serve as the reference standard. Both CT scans were processed using two publicly available lung-nodule CAD systems previously trained using adult data: FlyerScan and Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI). The systems' sensitivities for nodules measuring 3-30 mm (n=247) were calculated when operating at a fixed frequency of two false-positives per scan. Results: FlyerScan exhibited detection sensitivities of 76.9% (190/247; 95% CI: 73.3-80.8%) on standard-dose scans and 66.8% (165/247; 95% CI: 62.6-71.5) on low-dose scans. MONAI exhibited detection sensitivities of 67.6% (167/247, 95% CI: 61.5-72.1) on standard-dose scans and 62.3% (154/247, 95% CI: 56.1-66.5%) on low-dose scans. The number of detected nodules for standard-dose versus low-dose scans for 3-mm nodules was 33 versus 24 (FlyerScan) and 16 versus 13 (MONAI), 4-mm nodules was 46 versus 42 (FlyerScan) and 39 versus 30 (MONAI), 5-mm nodules was 38 versus 33 (FlyerScan) and 32 versus 31 (MONAI), and 6-mm nodules was 27 versus 20 (FlyerScan) and 24 versus 24 (MONAI). For nodules measuring ≥7 mm, detection did not show a consistent pattern between standard-dose and low-dose scans for either system. Conclusions: Two lung-nodule CAD systems demonstrated decreased sensitivity on low-dose versus standard-dose pediatric CT scans performed in the same patients. The reduced detection at low dose was overall more pronounced for nodules measuring less than 5 mm. Clinical Impact: Caution is needed when using low-dose CT protocols in combination with CAD systems to help detect small lung nodules in pediatric patients.

Expert consensus on the multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of multiple ground glass nodule-like lung cancer (2024 Edition)

ABSTRACT

This expert consensus reviews current literature and provides clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple ground glass nodule-like lung cancer. The main contents of this review include the following: ① follow-up strategies, ② differential diagnosis, ③ diagnosis and staging, ④ treatment methods, and ⑤ post-treatment follow-up.

Effect of emphysema on AI software and human reader performance in lung nodule detection from low-dose chest CT

BACKGROUND

Emphysema influences the appearance of lung tissue in computed tomography (CT). We evaluated whether this affects lung nodule detection by artificial intelligence (AI) and human readers (HR).

METHODS

Individuals were selected from the "Lifelines" cohort who had undergone low-dose chest CT. Nodules in individuals without emphysema were matched to similar-sized nodules in individuals with at least moderate emphysema. AI results for nodular findings of 30-100 mm3 and 101-300 mm3 were compared to those of HR; two expert radiologists blindly reviewed discrepancies. Sensitivity and false positives (FPs)/scan were compared for emphysema and non-emphysema groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine participants with and 82 without emphysema were included (n = 121, aged 61 ± 8 years (mean ± standard deviation), 58/121 males (47.9%)). AI and HR detected 196 and 206 nodular findings, respectively, yielding 109 concordant nodules and 184 discrepancies, including 118 true nodules. For AI, sensitivity was 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.77) in emphysema versus 0.71 (0.62-0.78) in non-emphysema, with FPs/scan 0.51 and 0.22, respectively (p = 0.028). For HR, sensitivity was 0.76 (0.65-0.84) and 0.80 (0.72-0.86), with FPs/scan of 0.15 and 0.27 (p = 0.230). Overall sensitivity was slightly higher for HR than for AI, but this difference disappeared after the exclusion of benign lymph nodes. FPs/scan were higher for AI in emphysema than in non-emphysema (p = 0.028), while FPs/scan for HR were higher than AI for 30-100 mm3 nodules in non-emphysema (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

AI resulted in more FPs/scan in emphysema compared to non-emphysema, a difference not observed for HR.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In the creation of a benchmark dataset to validate AI software for lung nodule detection, the inclusion of emphysema cases is important due to the additional number of FPs.

KEY POINTS

• The sensitivity of nodule detection by AI was similar in emphysema and non-emphysema. • AI had more FPs/scan in emphysema compared to non-emphysema. • Sensitivity and FPs/scan by the human reader were comparable for emphysema and non-emphysema. • Emphysema and non-emphysema representation in benchmark dataset is important for validating AI.

Performance Analysis in Children of Traditional and Deep Learning CT Lung Nodule Computer-Aided Detection Systems Trained on Adults

BACKGROUND. Although primary lung cancer is rare in children, chest CT is commonly performed to assess for lung metastases in children with cancer. Lung nodule computer-aided detection (CAD) systems have been designed and studied primarily using adult training data, and the efficacy of such systems when applied to pediatric patients is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in children the diagnostic performance of traditional and deep learning CAD systems trained with adult data for the detection of lung nodules on chest CT scans and to compare the ability of such systems to generalize to children versus to other adults. METHODS. This retrospective study included pediatric and adult chest CT test sets. The pediatric test set comprised 59 CT scans in 59 patients (30 boys, 29 girls; mean age, 13.1 years; age range, 4-17 years), which were obtained from November 30, 2018, to August 31, 2020; lung nodules were annotated by fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists as the reference standard. The adult test set was the publicly available adult Lung Nodule Analysis (LUNA) 2016 subset 0, which contained 89 deidentified scans with previously annotated nodules. The test sets were processed through the traditional FlyerScan (github.com/rhardie1/FlyerScanCT) and deep learning Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI; github.com/Project-MONAI/model-zoo/releases) lung nodule CAD systems, which had been trained on separate sets of CT scans in adults. Sensitivity and false-positive (FP) frequency were calculated for nodules measuring 3-30 mm; nonoverlapping 95% CIs indicated significant differences. RESULTS. Operating at two FPs per scan, on pediatric testing data FlyerScan and MONAI showed significantly lower detection sensitivities of 68.4% (197/288; 95% CI, 65.1-73.0%) and 53.1% (153/288; 95% CI, 46.7-58.4%), respectively, than on adult LUNA 2016 subset 0 testing data (83.9% [94/112; 95% CI, 79.1-88.0%] and 95.5% [107/112; 95% CI, 90.0-98.4%], respectively). Mean nodule size was smaller (p < .001) in the pediatric testing data (5.4 ± 3.1 [SD] mm) than in the adult LUNA 2016 subset 0 testing data (11.0 ± 6.2 mm). CONCLUSION. Adult-trained traditional and deep learning-based lung nodule CAD systems had significantly lower sensitivity for detection on pediatric data than on adult data at a matching FP frequency. The performance difference may relate to the smaller size of pediatric lung nodules. CLINICAL IMPACT. The results indicate a need for pediatric-specific lung nodule CAD systems trained on data specific to pediatric patients.

ERS International Congress 2023: highlights from the Clinical Techniques, Imaging and Endoscopy Assembly

The Clinical Techniques, Imaging and Endoscopy Assembly is involved in the diagnosis and treatment of several pulmonary diseases, as demonstrated at the 2023 European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress in Milan, Italy. From interventional pulmonology, the congress included several exciting results for the use of bronchoscopy in lung cancer, including augmented fluoroscopy, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy and cryobiopsies. In obstructive lung disease, the latest results on bronchoscopic treatment of emphysema with hyperinflation and chronic bronchitis were presented. Research on using cryobiopsies to diagnose interstitial lung disease was further explored, with the aims of elevating diagnostic yield and minimising risk. For imaging, the latest updates in using artificial intelligence to overcome the increased workload of radiologists were of great interest. Novel imaging in sarcoidosis explored the use of magnetic resonance imaging, photon-counting computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic work-up. Lung cancer screening is still a hot topic and new results were presented regarding incorporation of biomarkers, identifying knowledge gaps and improving screening programmes. The use of ultrasound in respiratory medicine is an expanding field, which was demonstrated by the large variety in studies presented at the 2023 ERS Congress. Ultrasound of the diaphragm in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and myasthenia gravis was used to assess movements and predict respiratory fatigue. Furthermore, studies using ultrasound to diagnose or monitor pulmonary disease were presented. The congress also included studies regarding the training and assessment of competencies as an important part of implementing ultrasound in clinical practice.