Therapeutic Approach for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review

Awake neurosurgery: Advancements in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

Background

The treatment landscape for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) involves various surgical interventions, among which microvascular decompression (MVD) stands out as highly effective. While MVD offers significant benefits, its success relies on precise surgical techniques and patient selection. In addition, the emergence of awake surgery techniques presents new opportunities to improve outcomes and minimize complications associated with MVD for TN.

Methods

A thorough review of the literature was conducted to explore the effectiveness and challenges of MVD for TN, as well as the impact of awake surgery on its outcomes. PubMed and Medline databases were searched from inception to March 2024 using specific keywords "Awake Neurosurgery," "Microvascular Decompression," AND "Trigeminal Neuralgia." Studies reporting original research on human subjects or preclinical investigations were included in the study.

Results

This review highlighted that MVD emerges as a highly effective treatment for TN, offering long-term pain relief with relatively low rates of recurrence and complications. Awake surgery techniques, including awake craniotomy, have revolutionized the approach to MVD, providing benefits such as reduced postoperative monitoring, shorter hospital stays, and improved neurological outcomes. Furthermore, awake MVD procedures offer opportunities for precise mapping and preservation of critical brain functions, enhancing surgical precision and patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The integration of awake surgery techniques, particularly awake MVD, represents a significant advancement in the treatment of TN. Future research should focus on refining awake surgery techniques and exploring new approaches to optimize outcomes in MVD for TN.

An update on pharmacotherapy for trigeminal neuralgia

INTRODUCTION

Trigeminal neuralgia is a rare condition that can be effectively treated by carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine but these older drugs are associated with dose-dependent and potentially treatment-limiting adverse effects. Third-generation anticonvulsants, new calcitonin gene-related peptide blockers for migraine, and older drugs such as ketamine and cannabinoids may be promising adjuvants or monotherapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

The new drugs, their presumed mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy are discussed herein. There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence in support of these drugs for trigeminal neuralgia. New migraine agents are considered as well although migraines and trigeminal neuralgia are distinct, albeit similar, conditions. No new drugs have been released to market in recent years with the specific indication of trigeminal neuralgia.

EXPERT OPINION

In real-world clinical practice, about half of trigeminal neuralgia patients take more than one agent for prevention and combination therapy may be the optimal approach. Combination therapy might allow for lower doses of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine, thus reducing the number and severity of potential adverse events but the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions must be considered. Drug therapy for trigeminal neuralgia involves acute or abortive treatments, often administered in hospital versus long-term preventive therapy, usually involving oral agents.

Modern Approaches to the Treatment of Acute Facial Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute facial pain presents a complex challenge in medical practice, requiring a comprehensive and interdisciplinary approach to its management. This narrative review explores the contemporary landscape of treating acute facial pain, delving into pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and advanced interventions. The significance of tailored treatment strategies, rooted in the diverse etiologies of facial pain, such as dental infections, trigeminal neuralgia, temporomandibular joint disorders, sinusitis, or neurological conditions like migraines or cluster headaches, is underscored. We particularly emphasize recent advances in treating trigeminal neuralgia, elucidating current treatment concepts in managing this particular acute facial pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research sheds light on various treatment modalities for acute facial pain. Pharmacotherapy ranges from traditional NSAIDs and analgesics to anticonvulsants and antidepressants. Non-pharmacological interventions, including physical therapy and psychological approaches, play pivotal roles. Advanced interventions, such as nerve blocks and surgical procedures, are considered in cases of treatment resistance. Moreover, we explore innovative technologies like neuromodulation techniques and personalized medicine, offering promising avenues for optimizing treatment outcomes in acute facial pain management. Modern management of acute facial pain requires a nuanced and patient-centric approach. Tailoring treatment strategies to the individual's underlying condition is paramount. While pharmacotherapy remains a cornerstone, the integration of non-pharmacological interventions is essential for comprehensive care. Advanced interventions should be reserved for cases where conservative measures prove inadequate. Furthermore, leveraging innovative technologies and personalized medicine holds promise for enhancing treatment efficacy. Ultimately, a holistic approach that considers the diverse needs of patients is crucial for effectively addressing acute facial pain.

Effectiveness of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic condition characterized by intense facial pain akin to electric shocks, often associated with the trigeminal nerve. It can be either idiopathic or secondary, with multiple sclerosis (Ms) being a significant contributing factor. Non-responsive patients may opt for minimally invasive procedures, such as gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), which offers precise, non-invasive treatment and is frequently chosen as a primary approach. This meta-analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of GKRS in TN management in Ms patients.

METHODS

We conducted a focused search across various databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies with ≥ 30 patients using GKRS for TN in Ms, reporting pertinent clinical outcomes. Primary outcomes assessed GKRS efficacy through Barrow Neurological Institute Pain scores. Secondary outcomes encompassed bothersome numbness, facial numbness, and recurrence. Data analysis employed OpenMeta, random effect models, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 752 cases of GKRS for TN were included. Regarding the outcomes, 83% of patients experienced a positive initial pain response, while the overall treatment success rate was 51%. Additionally, 19.6% of patients reported facial numbness, 4.1% experienced bothersome numbness, and 40% faced recurrence. The odds ratio for positive initial pain response was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76-0.89), while for treatment success, it was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.379-0.639). Facial numbness had an odds ratio of 0.196 (95% CI, 0.130-0.262), bothersome numbness had an odds ratio of 0.041 (95% CI, 0.013-0.069), and recurrence had an odds ratio of 0.403 (95% CI, 0.254-0.551).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, treating trigeminal neuralgia in multiple sclerosis patients remains challenging. GKRS shows promise, but customized treatment approaches tailored to individual patient characteristics are urgently needed to address the unique challenges of this condition.