Anti-HER2/neu Antibody Reduces Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Toxicity-From Bench to Bedside

Maximizing ovarian function and fertility following chemotherapy in premenopausal patients: Is there a role for ovarian suppression?

As more premenopausal patients undergo fertility preserving cancer treatments, there is an increased need for fertility counseling and ovarian sparing strategies. Many patients receive gonadotoxic chemotherapeutic agents which can put them at risk of primary ovarian insufficiency or profoundly diminished ovarian reserve. Traditionally, estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) values have been used to evaluate ovarian function but more recently, reproductive endocrinologists have been proponents of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) as a validated measure of ovarian potential. While the gold standard for fertility preservation remains oocyte cryopreservation, data suggest there may be additional interventions that can mitigate the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents. The main objectives of this focused review were to quantify the risk of primary ovarian failure associated with the most common chemotherapies used in treatment of gynecologic cancers and to evaluate and recommend potential interventions to mitigate toxic effects on ovarian function. Chemotherapeutic agents can cause direct loss of oocytes and primordial follicles as well as stromal and vascular atrophy and the extent is dependent upon mechanism of action and age of the patient. The risk of ovarian failure is the highest with alkylating agents (42.2 %), anthracyclines (<10-34 % in patients under 40 years versus 98 % in patients aged 40-49), taxanes (57.1 %) and platinum agents (50 %). Multiple trials demonstrate that gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, when administered concurrently with chemotherapy, may have protective effects, with more patients experiencing resumption of a regular menstruation pattern and recovering ovarian function more quickly post-treatment. Premenopausal patients receiving chemotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancers should receive adequate counseling on the potential adverse effects on their fertility. Although oocyte cryopreservation remains the gold standard for fertility preservation, there is some evidence to suggest that GNRH agonists could help maintain and preserve ovarian function and should be considered.

Chemotherapy-Related Amenorrhea and Quality of Life Among Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer

Importance

Younger survivors of breast cancer frequently report more treatment-related symptoms, mostly related to the menopausal transition.

Objective

To assess factors associated with chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) and to evaluate its association with long-term quality of life (QOL).

Design, Setting, and Participants

The prospective, longitudinal Cancer Toxicities Study, a multicenter French cohort study, includes women with a diagnosis of stage I to III breast cancer and collects data approximately yearly after diagnosis. The current study reports outcomes up to 4 years after diagnosis for participants enrolled from 2012 to 2017. Participants included premenopausal women younger than 50 years treated with chemotherapy and not receiving adjuvant ovarian function suppression. Data analysis was performed from September 2021 to June 2023.

Exposures

Clinical, socioeconomic, tumor, and treatment characteristics assessed at diagnosis (for the analysis of factors associated with CRA) and persistent CRA (for the QOL analysis).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome of interest was CRA at year 1 (Y1), year 2 (Y2), and year 4 (Y4) after diagnosis. Generalized estimating equations assessed associations of exposure variables with CRA. In the QOL analysis, QOL at Y4 (assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and BR23) was the outcome of interest. Multivariable random-effect mixed models assessed the association of persistent CRA (ie, never recovering menses after treatment) with QOL.

Results

Among 1636 women, the mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 42.2 (5.6) years. Overall, 1242 of 1497 women (83.0%) reported CRA at Y1, 959 of 1323 women (72.5%) reported it at Y2, and 599 of 906 women (66.1%) reported it at Y4. Older age vs 18 to 34 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for 35 to 39 years, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.32 to 2.56]; adjusted OR for 40 to 44 years, 5.90 [95% CI, 4.23 to 8.24]; and adjusted OR for ≥45 years, 21.29 [95% CI, 14.34 to 31.61]) and receipt of adjuvant tamoxifen (adjusted OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.53 to 2.53]) were associated with higher likelihood of CRA. In the QOL analysis, 416 of 729 women (57.1%) had persistent CRA. However, late menses recovery among women aged 18 to 34 years with no menses at Y2 were reported by 11 of 21 women (52.4%) between Y2 and Y4. Persistent CRA was associated with worse insomnia (mean difference vs recovery at any time, 9.9 points [95% CI, 3.2 to 16.5 points]; P = .004), systemic therapy-related adverse effects (mean difference, 3.0 points [95% CI, 0.2 to 5.8 points]; P = .04), and sexual functioning (mean difference, -9.2 points [95% CI, -14.3 to -4.1 points]; P < .001) at Y4.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of premenopausal women with breast cancer, persistent CRA was common, although some women recovered menses late, and was associated with worse long-term QOL. This study can help inform risk communication, personalized counseling, and early supportive care referrals for such patients.

Chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage and protective strategies

More than 9.2 million women worldwide suffer from cancer, and about 5% of them are at reproductive age. Chemotherapy-induced impairment of fertility affects the quality of life of these women. Several chemotherapeutic agents have been proven to cause apoptosis and autophagy by inducing DNA damage and cellular stress. Injuries to the ovarian stroma and micro-vessel network are also considered as pivotal factors resulting in ovarian dysfunction induced by chemotherapeutic agents. Primordial follicle pool over-activation may also be the mechanism inducing damage to the ovarian reserve. Although many studies have explored the mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced reproductive toxicity, the exact molecular mechanisms have not been elucidated. It is essential to understand the mechanisms involved in ovarian damage, in order to develop potential protective treatments to preserve fertility. In this article, we reviewed the current knowledge on the mechanism of chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage and possible protective strategies that prevent the ovary from such damages.

Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Review

Fertility preservation is a major concern in young patients diagnosed with breast cancer and planning to receive multimodality treatment, including gonadotoxic chemotherapy with or without age-related decline through long-term endocrine therapy. Most breast cancer patients undergo multimodality treatments; many short-term and long-term side effects arise during these therapies. One of the most detrimental side effects is reduced fertility due to gonadotoxic treatments with resultant psychosocial stress. Cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, and ovarian tissue are currently available fertility preservation methods for these patients. As an adjunct to these methods, in vitro maturation or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist could also be considered. It is also essential to communicate well with patients in the decision-making process on fertility preservation. It is essential to refer patients diagnosed with breast cancer on time to fertility specialists for individualized treatment, which may lead to desirable outcomes. To do so, a multimodal team-based approach and in-depth discussion on the treatment of breast cancer and fertility preservation is crucial. This review aims to summarize infertility risk related to currently available breast cancer treatment, options for fertility preservation and its details, barriers to oncofertility counseling, and psychosocial issues.

Pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protects against chemotherapy-induced testicular damage 'in mice

Background

Testicular toxicity following chemotherapy is of increasing importance with the continuous improvement of survival rates. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was suggested to protect testis against such toxicity; however, its suppressive quality and mechanism of action are still unclear. We examined whether and how pretreatment with GnRH antagonist protects against the testicular damage caused by chemotherapy.

Methods

Mature male mice were injected subcutaneously eight times in 2-day intervals with either saline or GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide; 1 g/mg), followed by an intraperitoneal injection with either saline or cyclophosphamide (CTX;100 mg/kg BW) and sacrificed 2 weeks or 3 months later. Testicular weight, epididymis weight, epididymal sperm count and sperm motility were measured. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immunohistochemistry (Ki-67), immunofluorescence (PCNA, CD34), terminal transferase-mediated deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and computerized analysis were performed to examine testicular proliferation, apoptosis and vascularization. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to assess the amount of spermatogonial reserve (Id4 and Gfra1 mRNAs).

Results

Pretreatment with GnRH antagonist transiently reduced testicular weight, epididymal weight, germinal proliferation and sperm count; it also abolished the permanent long-term effect of CTX on these parameters and prevented cyclophosphamide-induced testicular toxicity characterized by apoptosis and serum AMH increase and irreversible loss of spermatogonial reserve.

Conclusions

Our findings imply that pretreatment with GnRH antagonist temporarily reduces spermatogenesis and may be used as pretreatment for reducing chemotherapeutic testicular toxicity.

Potential ovarian toxicity and infertility risk following targeted anti-cancer therapies

Unlike traditional chemotherapy agents which are generally cytotoxic to all cells, targeted anti-cancer therapies are designed to specifically target proliferation mechanisms in cancer cells but spare normal cells, resulting in high potency and reduced toxicity. There has therefore been a rapid increase in their development and use in clinical settings, including in curative-intent treatment regimens. However, the targets of some of these drugs including kinases, epigenetic regulatory proteins, DNA damage repair enzymes and proteasomes, have fundamental roles in governing normal ovarian physiology. Inhibiting their action could have significant consequences for ovarian function, with potentially long-lasting adverse effects which persist after cessation of treatment, but there is limited evidence of their effects on reproductive function. In this review, we will use literature that examines these pathways to infer the potential toxicity of targeted anti-cancer drugs on the ovary.

Lay summary

Compared to traditional chemotherapy agents, anti-cancer therapies are thought to be highly effective at targeting cancer cells but sparing normal cells, resulting in reduced drug side effects. However, many of processes within the cells that these drugs affect are also important for the ovary to work normally, so suppressing them in this way could have long-lasting implications for female fertility. This review examines the potential toxicity of anti-cancer therapies on the ovary.

Irinotecan (CPT-11) Treatment Induces Mild Gonadotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Gonadal toxicity following chemotherapy is an important issue among the population of young cancer survivors. The inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase I, irinotecan (CPT-11), is widely used for several cancer types. However, little is known about the effect of irinotecan on the fertility of both genders. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate irinotecan gonadotoxicity, using a mouse model.

METHODS

Mature male and female mice were injected intraperitoneally with either saline (), irinotecan (100 mg/kg) or cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg); and sacrificed one week or three months later for an acute or long-term toxicity assessment, respectively. We used thorough and advanced fertility assessment by already established methods: Gonadal and epididymal weights, as well as sperm count and sperm motility were determined; serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was measured by ELISA. Immunohistochemistry (Ki-67), immunofluorescence (PCNA, CD34), terminal transferase-mediated deoxyuridine 5-triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and computerized analysis were performed to examine gonadal proliferation, apoptosis and vascularization. qPCR was used to assess the amount of testicular spermatogonia (Id4 and Gafra1 mRNA) and ovarian primordial oocytes reserves (Sohlh2, Nobox and Figla mRNA).

RESULTS

Females: Irinotecan administration induced acute ovarian apoptosis and decreased vascularity, as well as a mild, statistically significant, long-term decrease in the number of growing follicles, ovarian weight, and ovarian reserve. Males: Irinotecan administration caused an acute testicular apoptosis and reduced testicular spermatogenesis, but had no effect on vascularity. Irinotecan induced long-term decrease of testicular weight, sperm count and testicular spermatogonia and caused elevated serum AMH.

CONCLUSION

Our findings imply a mild, though irreversible effect of irinotecan on mice gonads.