1
|
Tiller JM, Stott A, Finlay K, Boughtwood T, Madelli EO, Horton A, Winship I, Nowak K, Otlowski M. Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:98-108. [PMID: 37280361 PMCID: PMC10242214 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic risk information for medically actionable conditions has relevance for patients' blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%, and the burden of contacting relatives is a significant barrier to dissemination of risk information. Health professionals (HPs) could notify at-risk relatives directly, with patients' consent. This practice is supported by international literature, including strong public support. However, there is little exploration of the Australian public's views about this issue. We surveyed Australian adults using a consumer research company. Respondents were provided a hypothetical scenario and asked about views and preferences regarding direct contact by HPs. 1030 members of the public responded, with median age 45 y and 51% female. The majority would want to be told about genetic risk for conditions that can be prevented/treated early (85%) and contacted directly by a HP (68%). Most preferred a letter that included specific information about the genetic condition in the family (67%) and had no privacy concerns about HPs sending a letter using contact details provided by a relative (85%). A minority (< 5%) had significant privacy concerns, mostly about use of personal contact information. Concerns included ensuring information was not shared with third parties. Almost 50% would prefer that a family member contacted them before the letter was sent, while about half did not prefer this or were unsure. The Australian public supports (and prefers) direct notification of relatives at risk of medically actionable genetic conditions. Guidelines would assist with clarifying clinicians' discretion in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Tiller
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Ami Stott
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Keri Finlay
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Tiffany Boughtwood
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Evanthia O Madelli
- Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ari Horton
- Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristen Nowak
- Office of Population Health Genomics, WA Department of Health, East Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Margaret Otlowski
- Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|