Comparison of Different Visual Feedback Methods for SSVEP-Based BCIs

Does Real-Time Feedback Improve User Performance in SSVEP-based Brain-Computer Interfaces?

Offline and online experiments are both widely used in SSVEP-based BCI research and development for different purposes. One of the major differences between offline and online experiments is the existence of real-time feedback to the user while they are using the interface. However, the role of feedback in SSVEP-based BCIs has not yet been well studied. This work focuses on understanding the effect of feedback in SSVEP-based BCIs and if there exists any relationship between offline and online BCI performance. An experiment was designed to compare directly the accuracies of the BCI with and without feedback for participants. Results showed that feedback can improve performance in a complex task, but no clear improvement was observed in a simple task.

Brain-Computer Interface Speller Based on Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential: A Review Focusing on the Stimulus Paradigm and Performance

The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), measured by the electroencephalograph (EEG), has high rates of information transfer and signal-to-noise ratio, and has been used to construct brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers. In BCI spellers, the targets of alphanumeric characters are assigned different visual stimuli and the fixation of each target generates a unique SSVEP. Matching the SSVEP to the stimulus allows users to select target letters and numbers. Many BCI spellers that harness the SSVEP have been proposed over the past two decades. Various paradigms of visual stimuli, including the procedure of target selection, layout of targets, stimulus encoding, and the combination with other triggering methods are used and considered to influence on the BCI speller performance significantly. This paper reviews these stimulus paradigms and analyzes factors influencing their performance. The fundamentals of BCI spellers are first briefly described. SSVEP-based BCI spellers, where only the SSVEP is used, are classified by stimulus paradigms and described in chronological order. Furthermore, hybrid spellers that involve the use of the SSVEP are presented in parallel. Factors influencing the performance and visual fatigue of BCI spellers are provided. Finally, prevailing challenges and prospective research directions are discussed to promote the development of BCI spellers.