1
|
Suero Molina E, Bruneau M, Reuter G, Shahein M, Cavallo LM, Daniel RT, Kasper EM, Froelich S, Jouanneau E, Manet R, Messerer M, Mazzatenta D, Meling TR, Roche PH, Schroeder HWS, Tatagiba M, Visocchi M, Prevedello DM, Stummer W, Cornelius JF. Fluorescence guidance in skull base surgery: Applications and limitations - A systematic review. BRAIN & SPINE 2024; 4:103328. [PMID: 39309550 PMCID: PMC11416557 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.103328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Intraoperative fluorescence guidance is a well-established surgical adjunct in high-grade glioma surgery. In contrast, the clinical use of such dyes and technology has been scarcely reported in skull base surgery. Research question We aimed to systematically review the clinical applications of different fluorophores in both open and endonasal skull base surgery. Material and methods We performed a systematic review and discussed the current literature on fluorescence guidance in skull base surgery. Results After a comprehensive literature search, 77 articles on skull base fluorescence guidance were evaluated. A qualitative analysis of the articles is presented, discussing clinical indications and current controversies. The use of intrathecal fluorescein was the most frequently reported in the literature. Beyond that, 5-ALA and ICG were two other fluorescent dyes most extensively discussed, with some experimental fluorophore applications in skull base surgery. Discussion and conclusion Intraoperative fluorescence imaging can serve as an adjunct technology in skull base surgery. The scope of initial indications of these fluorophores has expanded beyond malignant glioma resection alone. We discuss current use and controversies and present an extensive overview of additional indications for fluorescence imaging in skull base pathologies. Further quantitative studies will be needed in the future, focusing on tissue selectivity and time-dependency of the different fluorophores currently commercially available, as well as the development of new compounds to expand applications and facilitate skull base surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Suero Molina
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Bruneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gilles Reuter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Luigi M. Cavallo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Dental Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Federico II University of Naples, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Italy
| | - Roy T. Daniel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ekkehard M. Kasper
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University Medical School, MA and Steward Medical Group, Brighton, MA/USA McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastien Froelich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Emanuel Jouanneau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - Romain Manet
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
| | - Mahmoud Messerer
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Dental Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Federico II University of Naples, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Italy
| | - Diego Mazzatenta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Sciences Institut IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
| | - Torstein R. Meling
- Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Pierre-Hugues Roche
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | | | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Massimiliano Visocchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosurgery Catholic University of Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel M. Prevedello
- Deparmtent of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Jan F. Cornelius
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - EANS Skull Base Section
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
- Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mansoura University, Egypt
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Dental Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Federico II University of Naples, Policlinico Federico II University Hospital, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University Medical School, MA and Steward Medical Group, Brighton, MA/USA McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière Hospital, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Sciences Institut IRCCS, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurosurgery, Aix-Marseille Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosurgery Catholic University of Rome, Italy
- Deparmtent of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sperber J, Zachem TJ, Prakash R, Owolo E, Yamamoto K, Nguyen AD, Hockenberry H, Ross WA, Herndon JE, Codd PJ, Goodwin CR. A blinded study using laser induced endogenous fluorescence spectroscopy to differentiate ex vivo spine tumor, healthy muscle, and healthy bone. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1921. [PMID: 38253556 PMCID: PMC10803777 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50995-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Ten patients undergoing surgical resection for spinal tumors were selected. Samples of tumor, muscle, and bone were resected, de-identified by the treating surgeon, and then scanned with the TumorID technology ex vivo. This study investigates whether TumorID technology is able to differentiate three different human clinical fresh tissue specimens: spine tumor, normal muscle, and normal bone. The TumorID technology utilizes a 405 nm excitation laser to target endogenous fluorophores, thereby allowing for the detection of tissue based on emission spectra. Metabolic profiles of tumor and healthy tissue vary, namely NADH (bound and free emission peak, respectively: 487 nm, 501 nm) and FAD (emission peak: 544) are endogenous fluorophores with distinct concentrations in tumor and healthy tissue. Emission spectra analyzed consisted of 74 scans of spine tumor, 150 scans of healthy normal bone, and 111 scans of healthy normal muscle. An excitation wavelength of 405 nm was used to obtain emission spectra from tissue as previously described. Emission spectra consisted of approximately 1400 wavelength intensity pairs between 450 and 750 nm. Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted comparing AUC distributions for each treatment group, α = 0.05. Spectral signatures varied amongst the three different tissue types. All pairwise comparisons among tissues for Free NADH were statistically significant (Tumor vs. Muscle: p = 0.0006, Tumor vs. Bone: p < 0.0001, Bone vs. Muscle: p = 0.0357). The overall comparison of tissues for FAD (506.5-581.5 nm) was also statistically significant (p < 0.0001), with two pairwise comparisons being statistically significant (Tumor vs. Muscle: p < 0.0001, Tumor vs. Bone: p = 0.0045, Bone vs. Muscle: p = 0.249). These statistically significant differences were maintained when stratifying tumor into metastatic carcinoma (N = 57) and meningioma (N = 17). TumorID differentiates tumor tissue from normal bone and normal muscle providing further clinical evidence of its efficacy as a tissue identification tool. Future studies should evaluate TumorID's ability to serve as an adjunctive tool for intraoperative assessment of surgical margins and surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Sperber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Tanner J Zachem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Ravi Prakash
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Edwin Owolo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Kent Yamamoto
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - Annee D Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | | | - Weston A Ross
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Patrick J Codd
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive DUMC 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - C Rory Goodwin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 200 Trent Drive DUMC 3807, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang C, Zhao X, Li D, Ji F, Dong A, Chen X, Zhang J, Wang X, Zhao Y, Chen X. Advances in 5-aminoketovaleric acid(5-ALA) nanoparticle delivery system based on cancer photodynamic therapy. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
4
|
Zeppa P, De Marco R, Monticelli M, Massara A, Bianconi A, Di Perna G, Greco Crasto S, Cofano F, Melcarne A, Lanotte MM, Garbossa D. Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in Glioblastoma: 5-ALA, SF or Both? Differences between Fluorescent Dyes in 99 Consecutive Cases. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12050555. [PMID: 35624942 PMCID: PMC9138621 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12050555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor. The extent of resection (EOR) has been claimed as one of the most important prognostic factors. Fluorescent dyes aid surgeons in detecting a tumor’s borders. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and sodium fluorescein (SF) are the most used. Only a few studies have directly compared these two fluorophores. Methods: A single center retrospective analysis of patients treated for GBM in the period between January 2018 and January 2021 was built to find any differences in terms of EOR, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and overall survival (OS) on the use of 5-ALA, SF, or both. Results: Overall, 99 patients affected by isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type Glioblastoma were included. 5-ALA was administered to 40 patients, SF to 44, and both to 15. No statistically significant associations were identified between the fluorophore and EOR (p = 0.783) or postoperative KPS (p = 0.270). Survival analyses did not show a selective advantage for the use of a given fluorophore (p = 0.184), although there appears to be an advantageous trend associated with the concomitant use of both dyes, particularly after stratification by MGMT (p = 0.071). Conclusions: 5-Ala and SF are equally useful in achieving gross total resection of the enhancing tumor volume. The combination of both fluorophores could lead to an OS advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Zeppa
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Raffaele De Marco
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Matteo Monticelli
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Armando Massara
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Andrea Bianconi
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Di Perna
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| | | | - Fabio Cofano
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
- Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, 10153 Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Melcarne
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Michele Maria Lanotte
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Diego Garbossa
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (P.Z.); (A.M.); (A.B.); (G.D.P.); (F.C.).; (A.M.); (M.M.L.); (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zoli M, Daniele B, Giovanni R, Teresa S, Cesare Z, Giuseppe Maria DP. Young Neurosurgeons and Technology: Survey of Young Neurosurgeons Section of Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch). World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e436-e456. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
6
|
Kozlikina EI, Efendiev KT, Grigoriev AY, Bogdanova OY, Trifonov IS, Krylov VV, Loschenov VB. A Pilot Study of Fluorescence-Guided Resection of Pituitary Adenomas with Chlorin e6 Photosensitizer. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9020052. [PMID: 35200407 PMCID: PMC8869665 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9020052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluorescence diagnostics is one of the promising methods for intraoperative detection of brain tumor boundaries and helps in maximizing the extent of resection. This paper presents the results of a pilot study on the first use of the chlorin e6 photosensitizer and a two-channel video system for fluorescence-guided resection of pituitary adenomas. The study’s clinical part involved two patients diagnosed with hormonally inactive pituitary macroadenomas and one patient with a hormonally active one. All neoplasms had different sizes and growth patterns. The data showed accumulation of chlorin e6 in tumor tissues in high concentrations: Patient 1: 2 mg/kg, Patient 2: 5 mg/kg, and Patient 3: 4 mg/kg. For Patient 1, the residual part of the tumor was not resected since it was intimately attached to the anterior genu of the internal carotid artery. For Patients 2 and 3, no regions of increased Ce6 accumulation were detected in the tumor foci after resection. Therefore, the use of the Ce6 and a two-channel video system helped to achieve a high degree of tumor resection in each case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizaveta I. Kozlikina
- Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.T.E.); (V.B.L.)
- Institute for Physics and Engineering in Biomedicine, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russia
- Correspondence:
| | - Kanamat T. Efendiev
- Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.T.E.); (V.B.L.)
- Institute for Physics and Engineering in Biomedicine, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Yu. Grigoriev
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry”, The Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 127473 Moscow, Russia; (A.Y.G.); (O.Y.B.); (I.S.T.); (V.V.K.)
- The National Medical Research Centre for Endocrinology, 117292 Moscow, Russia
| | - Olesia Y. Bogdanova
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry”, The Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 127473 Moscow, Russia; (A.Y.G.); (O.Y.B.); (I.S.T.); (V.V.K.)
| | - Igor S. Trifonov
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry”, The Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 127473 Moscow, Russia; (A.Y.G.); (O.Y.B.); (I.S.T.); (V.V.K.)
| | - Vladimir V. Krylov
- Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry”, The Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 127473 Moscow, Russia; (A.Y.G.); (O.Y.B.); (I.S.T.); (V.V.K.)
| | - Victor B. Loschenov
- Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (K.T.E.); (V.B.L.)
- Institute for Physics and Engineering in Biomedicine, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, 115409 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Let Me See: Correlation between 5-ALA Fluorescence and Molecular Pathways in Glioblastoma: A Single Center Experience. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11060795. [PMID: 34208653 PMCID: PMC8235669 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite the aggressiveness of multimodal treatment, glioblastoma (GBM) is still a challenge for neurosurgeons, neurooncologists, and radiotherapists. A surgical approach is still a cornerstone in GBM therapeutic management, as the extent of resection is strongly related both to overall survival and progression-free survival. From this perspective, the use of photodynamic molecules could represent an interesting tool to achieve maximal and safe resection. Being able to trace the lesion’s edges, indeed, could allow to improve the extent of resection and to minimize residual tumor while sparing normal tissue. The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) as a photodynamic tracer is well established due to its strict correlation both with cellularity and metabolic activity of the GBM cell clones. Objective: Our study aims to define whether a different molecular asset of GBM (especially investigating IDH 1/2 mutation, proliferation index, and MGMT promoter methylation) results in different fluorescence expression, possibly because of differences in metabolic pathways due to different genotypes. Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for GBM removal at our Institute (Dep. Of Neurosurgery, Ospedale Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Italy) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with histological diagnosis confirmation and to whom 5-ALA was given before surgery were included. The whole surgical procedure was recorded and then analyzed by three different people (a medical student, a resident, and a senior surgeon with an interest in neurooncology and experience in using 5-ALA) and a score was assigned to the different degrees of intraoperative fluorescence. The degree of fluorescence was then matched with the genotype. Results: A trend of grade 2 fluorescence (i.e., ”strong”) was observed in the IDH 1/2 wild-type (WT) genotype, suggesting a more intense metabolic activity in this particular subgroup, while, no or weak fluorescence was observed more often in the IDH 1/2 mutated tumors, suggesting a lower metabolic activity. No relations were found between fluorescence grade and MGMT promoter methylation or, interestingly, cellularity. As a secondary analysis, more epileptogenicity of the IDH 1/2 mutated GBM was noticed, similarly to other recent literature. Conclusion: Our results do not support the use of 5-ALA as a diagnostic tool, or a way to substitute the molecular profiling, but confirm 5-ALA as a powerful metabolic tracer, able to easily detect the pathological cells, especially in the IDH WT genotype, and in this perspective, further studies will be necessary to better describe the metabolic activity of GBM cells.
Collapse
|