Identification of an IL-4-Related Gene Risk Signature for Malignancy, Prognosis and Immune Phenotype Prediction in Glioma

A lipid metabolism-related risk signature for patients with gliomas constructed with TCGA and CGGA data

Lipid metabolism affects cell proliferation, differentiation, membrane homeostasis and drug resistance. An in-depth exploration of lipid metabolism in gliomas might provide a novel direction for gliomas treatment. A lipid metabolism-related risk signature was constructed in our study to assess the prognosis of patients with gliomas. Lipid metabolism-related genes were extracted. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened, and a risk signature was built. The ability of the risk signature to predict the outcomes of patients with gliomas was assessed using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. The relationships between immunological characteristics, drug sensitivity and the risk score were evaluated, and the risk-related mechanisms were also estimated. Twenty lipid metabolism-related DEGs associated with the patient prognosis were included in the risk signature. The survival rate of high-risk patients was worse than that of low-risk patients. The risk score independently predicted the outcomes of patients. Immunological parameters, drug sensitivity, immunotherapy benefits, and numerous molecular mechanisms were significantly associated with the risk score. A lipid metabolism-related risk signature might effectively assess the prognosis of patients with gliomas. The risk score might guide individualized treatment and further clinical decision-making for patients with gliomas.

A Metabolic Plasticity-Based Signature for Molecular Classification and Prognosis of Lower-Grade Glioma

Background: Glioma is one of the major health problems worldwide. Biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of Glioma are still needed. Methods: The transcriptome data and clinic information on Glioma were obtained from the CGGA, TCGA, GDC, and GEO databases. The immune infiltration status in the clusters was compared. The genes with differential expression were identified, and a prognostic model was developed. Several assays were used to detect RPH3A’s role in Glioma cells, including CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, and transwell migration assay. Results: Lower Grade Glioma (LGG) was divided into two clusters. The immune infiltration difference was observed between the two clusters. We screened for genes that differed between the two groups. WGCNA was used to construct a co-expressed network using the DEGs, and four co-expressed modules were identified, which are blue, green, grey, and yellow modules. High-risk patients have a lower overall survival rate than low-risk patients. In addition, the risk score is associated with histological subtypes. Finally, the role of RPH3A was detected. The overexpression of RPH3A in LGG cells can significantly inhibit cell proliferation and migration and regulate EMT-regulated proteins. Conclusion: Our study developed a metabolic-related model for the prognosis of Glioma cells. RPH3A is a potential therapeutic target for Glioma.

Construction and validation of an angiogenesis-related gene expression signature associated with clinical outcome and tumor immune microenvironment in glioma

Background: Glioma is the most prevalent malignant intracranial tumor. Many studies have shown that angiogenesis plays a crucial role in glioma tumorigenesis, metastasis, and prognosis. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of angiogenesis-related genes (ARGs) in glioma.

Methods: RNA-sequencing data of glioma patients were obtained from TCGA and CGGA databases. Via consensus clustering analysis, ARGs in the sequencing data were distinctly classified into two subgroups. We performed univariate Cox regression analysis to determine prognostic differentially expressed ARGs and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression to construct a 14-ARG risk signature. The CIBERSORT algorithm was used to explore immune cell infiltration, and the ESTIMATE algorithm was applied to calculate immune and stromal scores.

Results: We found that the 14-ARG signature reflected the infiltration characteristics of different immune cells in the tumor immune microenvironment. Additionally, total tumor mutational burden increased significantly in the high-risk group. We combined the 14-ARG signature with patient clinicopathological data to construct a nomogram for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival with good accuracy. The predictive value of the prognostic model was verified in the CGGA cohort. SPP1 was a potential biomarker of glioma risk and was involved in the proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis of glioma cells.

Conclusion: In conclusion, we established and validated a novel ARG risk signature that independently predicted the clinical outcomes of glioma patients and was associated with the tumor immune microenvironment.