1
|
Mazibuko SM, Nadasan T, Govender P. Public-private partnership models for rehabilitation service delivery: A scoping review. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY 2023; 79:1856. [PMID: 37293244 PMCID: PMC10244957 DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Public-private partnership (PPP) for the delivery of health services is known to improve access to healthcare, yet little is known about its utilisation for rehabilitation services, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Objectives As a first step to generating evidence to develop a PPP model for physiotherapy service delivery in South Africa, our study mapped and described available research evidence on PPP models for rehabilitation services in the global literature. Method The Arksey and O'Malley framework guided our scoping review. Published research on rehabilitation and PPP was searched in five databases from 2000 to August 2022 using keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Boolean terms. Two reviewers independently completed the titles, abstracts and full-text screening of the articles and data extraction from the included articles. A narrative synthesis was conducted, and summaries of the findings are reported. Results Nine articles were included from a total of 137 obtained from the evidence searches. Of these, five were from Australia and the others from Hong Kong, Denmark, Bangladesh and the Netherlands. All the included articles showed evidence of PPP models for physiotherapy service delivery. Conclusion Our study suggests that PPP models for physiotherapy service delivery exist, particularly in high-income countries (HICs). It also highlights limited research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Clinical implications There is a need for primary studies to generate further evidence and develop innovative PPP models for rehabilitation services for the populations who need them most as part of efforts towards improving access to healthcare in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senzelwe M. Mazibuko
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- Senzelwisihe Rehabilitation Hospital, Empangeni, South Africa
| | - Thayananthee Nadasan
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Pragashnie Govender
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nanyunja C, Sadoo S, Kohli-Lynch M, Nalugya R, Nyonyintono J, Muhumuza A, Katumba KR, Trautner E, Magnusson B, Kabugo D, Cowan FM, Zuurmond M, Morgan C, Lester D, Seeley J, Webb EL, Otai C, Greco G, Nampijja M, Tann CJ. Early care and support for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda: The Baby Ubuntu feasibility trial. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:981976. [PMID: 36177453 PMCID: PMC9513138 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.981976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early care and support provision for young children with developmental disabilities is frequently lacking, yet has potential to improve child and family outcomes, and is crucial for promoting access to healthcare and early education. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, early evidence of impact and provider costs of the Baby Ubuntu participatory, peer-facilitated, group program for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda. Materials and methods A feasibility trial, with two parallel groups, compared Baby Ubuntu with standard care. Caregivers and children, aged 6-11 months with moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment, were recruited and followed for 12 months. Quantitative and qualitative methods captured information on feasibility (ability to recruit), acceptability (satisfactory attendance), preliminary evidence of impact (family quality of life) and provider costs. Results One hundred twenty-six infants (median developmental quotient, 28.7) were recruited and randomized (63 per arm) over 9 months, demonstrating feasibility; 101 (80%) completed the 12-month follow-up assessment (9 died, 12 were lost to follow up, 4 withdrew). Of 63 randomized to the intervention, 59 survived (93%); of these, 51 (86%) attended ≥6 modules meeting acceptability criteria, and 49 (83%) completed the 12 month follow-up assessment. Qualitatively, Baby Ubuntu was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Enabling factors included community sensitization by local champions, positive and caring attitudes of facilitators toward children with disability, peer support, and the participatory approach to learning. Among 101 (86%) surviving children seen at 12 months, mixed methods evaluation provided qualitative evidence of impact on family knowledge, skills, and attitudes, however impact on a scored family quality of life tool was inconclusive. Barriers included stigma and exclusion, poverty, and the need to manage expectations around the child's progress. Total provider cost for delivering the program per participant was USD 232. Conclusion A pilot feasibility trial of the Baby Ubuntu program found it to be feasible and acceptable to children, caregivers and healthcare workers in Uganda. A mixed methods evaluation provided rich programmatic learning including qualitative, but not quantitative, evidence of impact. The cost estimate represents a feasible intervention for this vulnerable group, encouraging financial sustainability at scale. Clinical trial registration [https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44380971], identifier [ISRCTN44380971].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Nanyunja
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Samantha Sadoo
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maya Kohli-Lynch
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Nalugya
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- Spina Bifida and Hydrocephalus Association of Uganda (SHA-U), Mbale, Uganda
| | - James Nyonyintono
- Kiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda
- Adara Development, Edmonds, WA, United States
| | | | | | - Emily Trautner
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke Magnusson
- Kiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda
- Adara Development, Edmonds, WA, United States
| | - Daniel Kabugo
- Kiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda
- Adara Development, Edmonds, WA, United States
| | - Frances M Cowan
- Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Zuurmond
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Morgan
- Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Janet Seeley
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily L Webb
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christine Otai
- Kiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda
- Adara Development, Edmonds, WA, United States
| | - Giulia Greco
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret Nampijja
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Cally J Tann
- MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Neonatal Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|