Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: Association with Fatigue, Depression and Sleep Inertia Prevailing in Women

Daytime sleepiness and BMI exhibit gender and age differences in patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence

The aim of the present study was to examine gender and age-specific effects on subjective daytime sleepiness (as measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale), body weight and eating behaviour in patients with central disorders of hypersomnolence. Based on the European Narcolepsy Network database, we compared 1035 patients with narcolepsy type I and 505 patients with other central disorders of hypersomnolence ("narcoleptic borderland"), including narcolepsy type II (N = 308) and idiopathic hypersomnia (N = 174), using logistic regression and general linear models. In the entire study population, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was higher in women (N = 735, mean age = 30 years, mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale = 16.6 ± SD 3.9) than in men (N = 805, mean age = 32 years, mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale = 15.8 ± SD 4.4). In women with narcolepsy type I (N = 475), both Epworth Sleepiness Scale and body mass index increased in parallel with age. In women of the narcoleptic borderland (N = 260), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale markedly peaked in their early 30s, while body mass index only started to rise at that age. This rise in body mass index following the Epworth Sleepiness Scale peak cannot be explained by sleepiness-induced uncontrolled eating, as self-reported uncontrolled eating was negatively associated with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in this group. We propose that the narcoleptic borderland harbours a unique cluster of women in their fertile years with an unexplored aetiology requiring further investigation towards tailored interventions.

Sex disparities in clinical features and burden of narcolepsy type 1

To investigate potential sex-related differences in patients with narcolepsy type 1, we carried out an analysis of baseline data from 93 women and 89 men with narcolepsy type 1 who participated in the TElemedicine for NARcolepsy (TENAR) trial. The following data were considered: sociodemographics; diagnostic (disease history, polysomnography, orexin, human leukocyte antigen) and clinical features, including sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), cataplexy and other narcolepsy symptoms; disease severity (Narcolepsy Severity Scale); pharmacological treatment; depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory); and self-reported relevance of eight narcolepsy-related issues. We found that, compared with men, significantly more women reported automatic behaviours (55.4% versus 40%) and had higher Epworth Sleepiness Scale (median 10 versus 9) and Beck Depression Inventory scores (median 10.5 versus 5), and there was a trend for a higher Narcolepsy Severity Scale total score in women (median 19 versus 18, p = 0.057). More women than men were officially recognized as having a disability (38% versus 22.5%) and considered 5/8 narcolepsy-related issues investigated as a relevant problem. More severe sleepiness and a greater narcolepsy-related burden in women could mirror sex differences present in the general population, or may be related to suboptimal management of narcolepsy type 1 or to more severe depressive symptoms in women. Future studies and guidelines should address these aspects.

Co-occurrence of anxiety and depressive symptoms, suicidal thoughts, and hopelessness in patients with narcolepsy type 1

OBJECTIVE

To assesses the prevalence and co-occurrence of anxiety, depressive symptoms, suicidal thoughts, and hopelessness in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 127 patients with NT1 (mean age 38.2 ± 15.5 years, 53.5 % female) and 131 controls (mean age 37.4 ± 14.3 years, 59.5 % female) matched for age, sex, and education, filled in the following validated questionnaires: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). Comparisons between groups and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Patients with NT1 presented significantly higher scores in BDI, suicidal thoughts (BDI-item-9), STAI-trait, STAI-state, and BHS than controls. Adjusted for age, sex, and educational level, NT1 was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (BDI≥13; OR 3.23, 95%CI 1.71-6.10), trait anxiety symptoms (STAI-trait≥38; OR 1.91, 95%CI 1.14-3.21), co-occurrence of BDI≥13 with STAI-trait≥38 (OR 2.72, 95%CI 1.47-5.05), and with STAI-state≥38 (OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.17-4.30), and moderate to severe hopelessness (BHS≥9; OR 2.95, 95%CI 1.55-5.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NT1 present a multidimensional psychiatric burden and comorbidity between symptoms of depression and anxiety and suicidal thoughts, a concern that deserves tailored interventions.

Validation and performance of the sleep inertia questionnaire in central disorders of hypersomnolence

BACKGROUND

Optimal measurement tools for problematic sleep inertia, common in some central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH), have not yet been determined. We evaluated the performance of the Sleep Inertia Questionnaire (SIQ) in CDH, and how well it distinguished hypersomnolent groups from controls, and IH (idiopathic hypersomnia) from narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).

METHODS

This prospective, bi-centric study included 63 control, 84 IH, 16 NT1, 18 narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and 88 subjective excessive daytime sleepiness (sEDS) participants, using ICSD-3 criteria. 126 (47.2 %) participants were on any medication at the time of SIQ completion. We assessed construct validity of SIQ scores, and sleep inertia duration (SID), and compared them across diagnoses, controlling for age and center. We derived cutpoints to distinguish hypersomnolent patients from controls and IH from NT1. Sensitivity analyses for depression, chronotype, and medication were performed.

RESULTS

The SIQ sum and composite score were significantly lower in controls than in other groups (p < 0.0001), demonstrating outstanding ability to distinguish patients from controls (AUCs 0.92), without differences among hypersomnolent groups. SID (AUC 0.76) was significantly shorter in controls than in all hypersomnolent groups except NT1, and was shorter in NT1 than in IH or sEDS. Optimal SIQ sum cutpoint was 42 (J = 0.71) for patients versus controls. Optimal SID cutpoint in distinguishing IH from NT1 was 25 min (J = 0.39).

CONCLUSION

The SIQ has excellent ability to distinguish hypersomnolent patients from healthy controls, after controlling for depression, eveningness, and medication. SID is best at distinguishing IH from NT1.

Investigation of anti-neuronal antibodies and disparity in central hypersomnias

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Microbial antigens can elicit an immune response leading to the production of autoantibodies cross-reacting with autoantigens. Still, their clinical significance in human sera in the context of brain diseases is unclear. Therefore, assessment of natural autoantibodies reacting with their neuropeptides may elucidate the autoimmune etiology of central hypersomnias. The study aims to determine whether serum autoantibody levels differ in patients with different types of central hypersomnias (narcolepsy type 1 and 2, NT1 and NT2; idiopathic hypersomnia, IH) and healthy controls and if the differences could suggest the participation of autoantibodies in disease pathogenesis.

METHODS

Sera from 91 patients with NT1, 27 with NT2, 46 with IH, and 50 healthy controls were examined for autoantibodies against assorted neuropeptides. Participants were screened using questionnaires related to sleep disorders, quality of life, and mental health conditions. In addition, serum biochemical parameters and biomarkers of microbial penetration through the intestinal wall were determined.

RESULTS

A higher prevalence of autoantibodies against neuropeptides was observed only for alpha-melanocytes-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and neuropeptide glutamic acid-isoleucine (NEI), which differed slightly among diagnoses. Patients with both types of narcolepsy exhibited signs of microbial translocation through the gut barrier. According to the questionnaires, patients diagnosed with NT2 or IH had subjectively worse life quality than patients with NT1. Patients displayed significantly lower levels of bilirubin and creatinine and slightly higher alkaline phosphatase values than healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, serum anti-neuronal antibodies prevalence is rare, suggesting that their participation in the pathophysiology of concerned sleep disorders is insignificant. Moreover, their levels vary slightly between diagnoses indicating no major diagnostic significance.

Psychotic Episode and Schizophrenia in Slovakian Narcolepsy Database

Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), a central disorder of hypersomnolence, is associated with mood, anxiety or hyperactivity mental disorders. Association with psychotic episode or schizophrenia is rare and could be the source of diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Their frequency in the national narcolepsy database has not been systematically studied. The aim of the presented study was to calculate the frequency of NT1 patients diagnosed with psychosis and/or schizophrenia, to identify clinical characteristics of these cases, and to look for narcoleptic and psychotic symptoms during re-evaluation years later. We identified three (4%) cases diagnosed with a psychotic episode in the course of NT1. They were diagnosed with NT1 by age ≤18 years. In the re-evaluation (mean follow-up 9.8 years), we identified one case with a dual diagnosis of NT1 and schizophrenia; two cases were diagnosed with a solitary psychotic episode in the course of NT1. NT1 patients diagnosed in the age ≤18 years are at higher risk of psychotic episode, and this may be related to higher vulnerability during the ongoing neurodevelopmental period. Comorbid schizophrenia with NT1 in the Slovakian Narcolepsy Database was within the prevalence expected in the general population. The solitary psychotic episode in the course of NT1 did not reduce the possibility of subsequent symptomatic treatment afterwards.