Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Brain Region Activated by Motor Imagery Involving a Paretic Wrist and Hand for Upper-Extremity Motor Improvement in Severe Stroke: A Preliminary Study

Noninvasive brain stimulation during EEG improves machine learning classication in chronic stroke

Background

In individuals with chronic stroke and hemiparesis, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may be used as an adjunct to therapy for improving motor recovery. Specific states of movement during motor recovery are more responsive to brain stimulation than others, thus a system that could auto-detect movement state would be useful in correctly identifying the most effective stimulation periods. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of different machine learning models in classifying movement periods during EEG recordings of hemiparetic individuals receiving noninvasive brain stimulation. We hypothesized that transcranial direct current stimulation, a form of NIBS, would modulate brain recordings correlating with movement state and improve classification accuracies above those receiving sham stimulation.

Methods

Electroencephalogram data were obtained from 10 participants with chronic stroke and 11 healthy individuals performing a motor task while undergoing transcranial direct current stimulation. Eight traditional machine learning algorithms and five ensemble methods were used to classify two movement states (a hold posture and an arm reaching movement) before, during and after stimulation. To minimize compute times, preprocessing and feature extraction were limited to z-score normalization and power binning into five frequency bands (delta through gamma).

Results

Classification of disease state produced significantly higher accuracies in the stimulation (versus sham) group at 78.9% (versus 55.6%, p < 0.000002). We observed significantly higher accuracies when classifying stimulation state in the chronic stroke group (77.6%) relative to healthy controls (64.1%, p < 0.0095). In the chronic stroke cohort, classification of hold versus reach was highest during the stimulation period (75.2%) as opposed to the pre- and post-stimulation periods. Linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and decision tree algorithms classified movement state most accurately in participants with chronic stroke during the stimulation period (76.1%). For the ensemble methods, the highest classification accuracy for hold versus reach was achieved using low gamma frequency (30-50 Hz) as a feature (74.5%), although this result did not achieve statistical significance.

Conclusions

Machine learning algorithms demonstrated sufficiently high movement state classification accuracy in participants with chronic stroke performing functional tasks during noninvasive brain stimulation. tDCS improved disease state and movement state classification in participants with chronic stroke.

Efficacy of brain-computer interfaces on upper extremity motor function rehabilitation after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The recovery of upper limb function is crucial to the daily life activities of stroke patients. Brain-computer interface technology may have potential benefits in treating upper limb dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the efficacy of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) in the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function in stroke patients.

METHODS

Six databases up to July 2023 were reviewed according to the PRSIMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials of BCI-based upper limb functional rehabilitation for stroke patients were selected for meta-analysis by pooling standardized mean difference (SMD) to summarize the evidence. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were included. The studies showed that BCI had a small effect on the improvement of upper limb function after the intervention. In terms of total duration of training, < 12 hours of training may result in better rehabilitation, but training duration greater than 12 hours suggests a non significant therapeutic effect of BCI training.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that BCI has a slight efficacy in improving upper limb function and has favorable long-term outcomes. In terms of total duration of training, < 12 hours of training may lead to better rehabilitation.