Dopaminergic System in Promoting Recovery from General Anesthesia

Striatal neurones expressing D1 dopamine receptors modulate consciousness in sevoflurane but not propofol anaesthesia in mice

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane and propofol are the most widely used inhaled and i.v. general anaesthetics, respectively. The mechanisms by which sevoflurane and propofol induce loss of consciousness (LOC) remain unclear. Recent studies implicate the brain dopaminergic circuit in anaesthetic-induced LOC and the cortical-striatal-thalamic-cortical loop in decoding consciousness. We investigated the contribution of the dorsal striatum, which is a critical interface between the dopaminergic circuit and the cortical-striatal-thalamic-cortical loop, in sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia.

METHODS

Electroencephalography and electromyography recordings and righting reflex tests were used to determine LOC and recovery of consciousness (ROC). The activity of D1 dopamine receptor (D1R)-expressing neurones in the dorsal striatum was monitored using fibre photometry, and regulated using optogenetic and chemogenetic methods in D1R-Cre mice.

RESULTS

Population activities of striatal D1R neurones began to decrease before LOC and gradually returned after ROC. During sevoflurane anaesthesia, optogenetic activation of striatal D1R neurones induced ROC at cortical and behavioural levels in steady-state anaesthesia and promoted cortical activation in deep burst suppression anaesthesia. Chemogenetic inhibition of striatal D1R neurones accelerated induction (from 242.0 [46.1] to 194.0 [26.9] s; P=0.010) and delayed emergence (from 93.5 [21.2] to 133.5 [33.9] s; P=0.005), whereas chemogenetic activation of these neurones accelerated emergence (from 107 [23.7] to 81.3 [16.1] s; P=0.011). However, neither optogenetic nor chemogenetic manipulation of striatal D1R neurones had any effects on propofol anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Striatal D1R neurones modulate the state of consciousness in sevoflurane anaesthesia, but not in propofol anaesthesia.

Methylphenidate Reversal of Dexmedetomidine-Induced Versus Ketamine-Induced Sedation in Rats

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine and ketamine have long elimination half-lives in humans and have no clinically approved reversal agents. Methylphenidate enhances dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission by inhibiting reuptake transporters for these arousal-promoting neurotransmitters. Previous studies in rats demonstrated that intravenous methylphenidate induces emergence from isoflurane and propofol general anesthesia. These 2 anesthetics are thought to act primarily through enhancement of inhibitory Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. In this study, we tested the behavioral and neurophysiological effects of methylphenidate in rats after low and high doses of dexmedetomidine (an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist) and ketamine (an N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antagonist) that induce sedation and unconsciousness, respectively.

METHODS

All experiments used adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 32 total) and all drugs were administered intravenously in a crossover, blinded experimental design. Locomotion after sedating doses of dexmedetomidine (10 µg/kg) or ketamine (10 mg/kg) with and without methylphenidate (5 mg/kg) was tested using the open field test (n = 16). Recovery of righting reflex after either high-dose dexmedetomidine (50 µg/kg) or high-dose ketamine (50 mg/kg) with and without methylphenidate (1-5 mg/kg) was assessed in a second cohort of rats (n = 8). Finally, in a third cohort of rats (n = 8), frontal electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded for spectral analysis under both low and high doses of dexmedetomidine and ketamine with and without methylphenidate.

RESULTS

Low-dose dexmedetomidine reduced locomotion by 94% in rats. Methylphenidate restored locomotion after low-dose dexmedetomidine (rank difference = 88.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 70.8-106) and the effect was blocked by coadministration with a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (rank difference = 86.2, 95% CI, 68.6-104). Low-dose ketamine transiently attenuated mobility by 58% and was not improved with methylphenidate. Methylphenidate did not affect the return of righting reflex latency in rats after high-dose dexmedetomidine nor ketamine. Frontal EEG analysis revealed that methylphenidate reversed spectral changes induced by low-dose dexmedetomidine (F [8,87] = 3.27, P = .003) but produced only transient changes after high-dose dexmedetomidine. Methylphenidate did not induce spectral changes in the EEG after low- or high-dose ketamine.

CONCLUSIONS

Methylphenidate reversed behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of sedation, but not unconsciousness, induced by dexmedetomidine. In contrast, methylphenidate did not affect sedation, unconsciousness, nor EEG signatures in rats after ketamine. These findings suggest that methylphenidate may be efficacious to reverse dexmedetomidine sedation in humans.

Three paradoxes related to the mode of action of pramipexole: The path from D2/D3 dopamine receptor stimulation to modification of dopamine-modulated functions

Pramipexole, a D2/D3 dopamine receptor agonist, is used to treat the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, caused by degeneration of the dopaminergic nigrostriatal pathway. There are three paradoxes associated with its mode of action. Firstly, stimulation of D2/D3 receptors leads to neuronal inhibition, although pramipexole does not inhibit but promotes some dopamine-modulated functions, such as locomotion and reinforcement. Secondly, another dopamine-modulated function, arousal, is not promoted but inhibited by pramipexole, leading to sedation. Thirdly, pramipexole-evoked sedation is associated with an increase in pupil diameter, although sedation is expected to cause pupil constriction. To resolve these paradoxes, the path from stimulation of D2/D3 receptors to the modification of dopamine-modulated functions has been tracked. The functions considered are modulated by midbrain dopaminergic nuclei: locomotion - substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), reinforcement/motivation - ventral tegmental area (VTA), sympathetic activity (as reflected in pupil function) - VTA; arousal - ventral periaqueductal grey (vPAG), with contributions from VTA and SNc. The application of genetics-based molecular techniques (optogenetics and chemogenetics) has enabled tracing the chains of neurones from the dopaminergic nuclei to their final targets executing the functions. The functional neuronal circuits linked to the D2/D3 receptors in the dorsal and ventral striata, stimulated by inputs from SNc and VTA, respectively, may explain how neuronal inhibition induced by pramipexole is translated into the promotion of locomotion, reinforcement/motivation and sympathetic activity. As the vPAG may increase arousal mainly by stimulating cortical D1 dopamine receptors, pramipexole would stimulate only presynaptic D2/D3 receptors on vPAG neurones, curtailing their activity and leading to sedation.

Electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area restores consciousness from sevoflurane-, dexmedetomidine-, and fentanyl-induced unconsciousness in rats

BACKGROUND

Dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are crucially involved in regulating arousal, making them a potential target for reversing general anesthesia. Electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the VTA restores consciousness in animals anesthetized with drugs that primarily enhance GABAA receptors. However, it is unknown if VTA DBS restores consciousness in animals anesthetized with drugs that target other receptors.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of VTA DBS in restoring consciousness after exposure to four anesthetics with distinct receptor targets.

METHODS

Sixteen adult Sprague-Dawley rats (8 female, 8 male) with bipolar electrodes implanted in the VTA were exposed to dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, ketamine, or sevoflurane to produce loss of righting, a proxy for unconsciousness. After receiving the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH-23390, or saline (vehicle), DBS was initiated at 30 μA and increased by 10 μA until reaching a maximum of 100 μA. The current that evoked behavioral arousal and restored righting was recorded for each anesthetic and compared across drug (saline/SCH-23390) condition. Electroencephalogram, heart rate and pulse oximetry were recorded continuously.

RESULTS

VTA DBS restored righting after sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine, and fentanyl-induced unconsciousness, but not ketamine-induced unconsciousness. D1 receptor antagonism diminished the efficacy of VTA stimulation following sevoflurane and fentanyl, but not dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrical DBS of the VTA restores consciousness in animals anesthetized with mechanistically distinct drugs, excluding ketamine. The involvement of the D1 receptor in mediating this effect is anesthetic-specific.

Recent advances in neural mechanism of general anesthesia induced unconsciousness: insights from optogenetics and chemogenetics

For over 170 years, general anesthesia has played a crucial role in clinical practice, yet a comprehensive understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying the induction of unconsciousness by general anesthetics remains elusive. Ongoing research into these mechanisms primarily centers around the brain nuclei and neural circuits associated with sleep-wake. In this context, two sophisticated methodologies, optogenetics and chemogenetics, have emerged as vital tools for recording and modulating the activity of specific neuronal populations or circuits within distinct brain regions. Recent advancements have successfully employed these techniques to investigate the impact of general anesthesia on various brain nuclei and neural pathways. This paper provides an in-depth examination of the use of optogenetic and chemogenetic methodologies in studying the effects of general anesthesia on specific brain nuclei and pathways. Additionally, it discusses in depth the advantages and limitations of these two methodologies, as well as the issues that must be considered for scientific research applications. By shedding light on these facets, this paper serves as a valuable reference for furthering the accurate exploration of the neural mechanisms underlying general anesthesia. It aids researchers and clinicians in effectively evaluating the applicability of these techniques in advancing scientific research and clinical practice.

Assessment of the relationship between the dopaminergic pathway and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, with related neuropathological features, and potential therapeutic approaches in COVID-19 infection

Dopamine is a known catecholamine neurotransmitter involved in several physiological processes, including motor control, motivation, reward, cognition, and immune function. Dopamine receptors are widely distributed throughout the nervous system and in immune cells. Several viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus and Japanese encephalitis virus, can use dopaminergic receptors to replicate in the nervous system and are involved in viral neuropathogenesis. In addition, studies suggest that dopaminergic receptors may play a role in the progression and pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. When SARS-CoV-2 binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors on the surface of neuronal cells, the spike protein of the virus can bind to dopaminergic receptors on neighbouring cells to accelerate its life cycle and exacerbate neurological symptoms. In addition, recent research has shown that dopamine is an important regulator of the immune-neuroendocrine system. Most immune cells express dopamine receptors and other dopamine-related proteins, indicating the importance of dopaminergic immune regulation. The increase in dopamine concentration during SARS-CoV2 infection may reduce immunity (innate and adaptive) that promotes viral spread, which could lead to neuronal damage. In addition, dopaminergic signalling in the nervous system may be affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID -19 can cause various neurological symptoms as it interacts with the immune system. One possible treatment strategy for COVID -19 patients could be the use of dopamine antagonists. To fully understand how to protect the neurological system and immune cells from the virus, we need to study the pathophysiology of the dopamine system in SARS-CoV-2 infection.