Tumor Location Influences Oncologic Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10. [PMID: 30309001 PMCID: PMC6210710 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10100378]

Nomogram to Predict Tumor Remnant of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Microwave Ablation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This investigation sought to create a nomogram to predict the ablation effect after microwave ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which can guide the selection of microwave ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas.

METHODS

In this two-center retrospective study, 233 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with microwave ablation (MWA) between January 2016 and December 2023 were enrolled and analyzed for their clinical baseline data, laboratory parameters, and MR imaging characteristics. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the features, and clinical and imaging feature models were developed separately. Finally, a nomogram was established. All models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Two models and a nomogram were developed to predict ablation outcomes after MWA based on a training set (n = 182, including complete ablation: 136, incomplete ablation: 46) and an external validation set (n = 51, complete ablation: 36, incomplete ablation: 15). The clinical models and nomogram performed well in the external validation cohort. The AUC of the nomogram was 0.966 (95% CI: 0.944- 0.989), with a sensitivity of 0.935, a specificity of 0.882, and an accuracy of 0.896.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining clinical data and imaging features, a nomogram was constructed that could effectively predict the postoperative ablation outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing MWA, which could help clinicians provide treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm

Background & Aims

Radiation therapy has been refined with increasing evidence of the benefits of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm.

Methods

Patients with a single HCC lesion ≤5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed.

Results

A total of 288 patients receiving RFA (n = 166) or SBRT (n = 122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The cumulative local recurrence rate in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57, p <0.001), especially for patients with tumours >2.0 cm (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, p <0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p <0.001). Cumulative distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (all p >0.050). Adverse events were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and total bilirubin increases. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Both RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels.

Impact and implications

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be used as an alternative treatment to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumours >3 cm and those with 1 to 3 tumours. This study focused on HCC patients with a specific tumour burden, namely a single lesion ≤5.0 cm, demonstrating that SBRT could be an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially for those with tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. The findings of this study provided robust empirical evidence supporting the utilization of SBRT in treating small HCC, while also establishing a solid foundation for future prospective clinical investigations.

Superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization for recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma: a 6-month outcome analysis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of superselective ablative chemo-ethanol embolization (SACE) for the treatment of patients with recurrent single hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 22 patients (19 men; median age, 63 years [range, 38-86]) with Child-Pugh class of A/ B/C (16/3/3) that underwent SACE between January and June 2023 for recurrent single HCCs measuring ≤5 cm in diameter using a mixture of 99% ethanol and ethiodized oil/doxorubicin emulsion. The primary endpoint was the 6-month tumor response, and the secondary endpoints were the 1-month tumor response and treatment-related safety. This study was approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

RESULTS

SACE was successfully performed in 22 patients (95.2%). The complete response rates at 1-month and 6-month after treatment were 100.0% and 83.3%, respectively. At 6-month, local tumor progression occurred in one patient and intrahepatic distant metastasis was found in six patients (30.0%). No 6-month mortalities were reported. No adverse events greater than grade 2 or laboratory deteriorations were observed. Biliary complications or liver abscesses were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

SACE for a single rHCC was highly effective in achieving a favorable 6-month tumor response and showed acceptable adverse events. However, further prospective studies are required to verify these findings.

Percutaneous ablation in perivascular-HCC: impact of liver parenchyma and characteristics of vascular structures on the outcomes

AIM

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for small-HCC (<3 cm). However, some features such as proximity to intrahepatic vascular structures (perivascular location) seem to be related to short- and long-term outcomes. The aims of the study were to investigate the features related to ablation success and local tumor progression (LTP) in patients submitted to percutaneous ablation for perivascular-HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2010 to May 2021, 132 perivascular-HCC nodules ablated with US-guided single probe percutaneous RFA were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate analysis and multivariable Cox regression model were used to identify factors that were independently related to ablation success and LTP-free survival.

RESULTS

The overall ablation success rate was 71.9% (n=95). Morbidity and mortality rates were 4.0% and 0.0%. The features related to ablation success: nodule size (≤20 mm vs. >20 mm) (OR 2.442, p=0.031), major vascular structures diameter (3-5 mm vs ≥ 5 mm) (OR 2.167, p=0.037) and liver parenchyma (cirrhosis vs no-cirrhosis) (OR 2.373, p=0.033). The following features resulted independently related to better LTP-free survival: nodule size ≤20 mm (HR 2.802, p=0.003), proximity to glissonean pedicles (HR 1.677, p=0.028), and major vascular structure diameter <5 mm (HR 1.987, p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Perivascular location confirmed to be a difficult and unfavorable indication for percutaneous ablation for HCC nodules. However, perivascular nodules not suitable for surgery with low-risk features (size <20 mm, proximity to glissonian pedicles and vascular diameter <5 mm) may be treated with RFA with satisfactory outcomes.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical resection and ablation for the treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, specifically in regard to surgical resection (SR) and ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SR and ablation on recurrence and prognosis in early-stage HCC patients, to optimize treatment strategies and improve long-term survival.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 801 patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A HCC and treated with SR or ablation between January 2015 and December 2019. The effectiveness and complications of both treatments were analyzed, and patients were followed up to measure recurrence and survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to increase comparability between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze recurrence and survival, and a Cox risk proportional hazard model was used to identify risk factors that affect recurrence and surviva.

RESULTS

Before PSM, the overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both groups, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates better in the SR group than in the ablation group. After PSM, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups. However, the RFS rates were significantly better in the SR group than in the ablation group. The ablation group exhibited superior outcomes compared to the SR group, with shorter treatment times, reduced bleeding, shorter hospital stays, and lower hospital costs. Concerning the location of the HCC within the liver, comparable efficacy was observed between SR and ablation for disease located in the noncentral region or left lobe. However, for HCCs located in the central region or right lobe of the liver, SR was more effective than ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed no significant difference in OS between SR and ablation for early-stage HCC, with SR providing better RFS and ablation demonstrating better safety profiles and lower hospital costs. These findings offer valuable insights for clinicians in determining optimal treatment strategies for early-stage HCC patients, particularly in terms of balancing efficacy, safety, and cost considerations.

Comparison of liver resection and radiofrequency ablation in long-term survival among patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized trials and high-quality propensity score-matched studies

BACKGROUND

Whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and liver resection (LR) are comparable treatments for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. We conducted this study to provide ample clinical evidence for the argument.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies that compared long-term outcomes of both RFA and LR for patients with early-stage HCC. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies consisting of six RCTs and 30 PSM studies were included in this study, and a total of 7384 patients were involved, with 3694 patients being treated with LR and 3690 patients with RFA. Meta-analysis showed that LR provided better OS and DFS than RFA (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.31; HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.39-1.74, respectively). A sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were stable. For the subgroup of patients with BCLC 0 stage, RFA and LR resulted in similar OS and DFS. For the subgroup of patients with single tumor sizes less than 3 cm, RFA reached similar OS (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.90-1.58) but worse DFS compared with LR (HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.11-1.90). For the subgroup of ablation margin larger than 0.5 cm, LR still resulted in better OS than RFA (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.09-1.53); while the ablation margin was larger than 1 cm, both RFA and LR resulted in similar OS. The modality of RFA was also a factor that affected results. Subgroup analysis showed that patients receiving ultrasound-guided RFA had worse OS and DFS than LR (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.14-1.36; HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.25-1.66, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis showed that LR provided better OS and DFS for patients with early-stage HCC. However, RFA and LR had similar effects on long-term survival in patients with BCLC 0 stage HCC. RFA and LR probably had similar effects on OS in patients with solitary HCC less than 3 cm or when the ablation margin was larger than 1 cm which need more studies to confirm. The effects of different modalities of RFA on long-term survival are needed for further assessment.

Development of a transformer model for predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation

INTRODUCTION

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a widely accepted, minimally invasive treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Accurate prognosis prediction is important to identify patients at high risk for cancer progression/recurrence after RFA. Recently, state-of-the-art transformer models showing improved performance over existing deep learning-based models have been developed in several fields. This study was aimed at developing and validating a transformer model to predict the overall survival in HCC patients with treated by RFA.

METHODS

We enrolled a total of 1778 treatment-naïve HCC patients treated by RFA as the first-line treatment. We developed a transformer-based machine learning model to predict the overall survival in the HCC patients treated by RFA and compared its predictive performance with that of a deep learning-based model. Model performance was evaluated by determining the Harrel's c-index and validated externally by the split-sample method.

RESULTS

The Harrel's c-index of the transformer-based model was 0.69, indicating its better discrimination performance than that of the deep learning model (Harrel's c-index, 0.60) in the external validation cohort. The transformer model showed a high discriminative ability for stratifying the external validation cohort into two or three different risk groups (p < 0.001 for both risk groupings). The model also enabled output of a personalized cumulative recurrence prediction curve for each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel transformer model for personalized prediction of the overall survival in HCC patients after RFA treatment. The current model may offer a personalized survival prediction schema for patients with HCC undergoing RFA treatment.

Tumor size and survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with surgical resection or ablation

OBJECTIVES

We performed a retrospective analysis within a national cancer registry on outcomes following resection or ablation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA).

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage I-III iCCA diagnosed during 2010-2018, who underwent resection or ablation. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods.

RESULTS

Of 2140 patients, 1877 (87.7%) underwent resection and 263 (12.3%) underwent ablation, with median tumor sizes of 5.5 and 3 cm, respectively. Overall, resection was associated with greater median OS (41.2 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 37.6-46.2) vs. 28 months (95% CI: 15.9-28.6) on univariable analysis (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference on multivariable analysis (p = 0.42); however, there was a significant interaction between tumor size and management. On subgroup analysis of patients with tumors <3 cm, there was no difference in OS between resection versus ablation. However, ablation was associated with increased mortality for tumors ≥3 cm.

CONCLUSION

Although resection is associated with improved OS for tumors ≥3 cm, we observed no difference in survival between management strategies for tumors < 3 cm. Ablation may be an alternative therapeutic strategy for small iCCA, particularly in patients at risk for high surgical morbidity.

Predictive Factors of Treatment Outcomes After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Hepatocaval Confluence: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and complications of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the hepatocaval confluence with those of HCC in the non-hepatocaval confluence and to explore the risk factors that lead to radiofrequency ablation failure and patient local tumor progression (LTP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2022, 86 patients with HCC in the hepatocaval confluence who had radiofrequency ablation were included. A 1:1 propensity-matched group of patients with HCC in the non-hepatocaval confluence with comparable clinical baseline traits, such as tumor diameter and tumor number, served as the control group. The two groups' complications, primary efficacy rate (PER), technical success rate (TSR), and prognosis were estimated.

RESULTS

After PSM, no significant difference of TSR (91.7% vs 95.8%, p = 0.491) and PER (95.8% vs 97.2%, p = 1.000) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year LTP rate (12.5% vs 9.9%, 28.2% vs 27.7%, 40.8% vs 43.8%, p = 0.959) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rate (87.5% vs 87.5%, 62.3% vs 54.2%, 18.1% vs 22.6%, p = 0.437) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rate (94.3% vs 95.7%, 72.7% vs 69.6%, 20.9% vs 33.6%, p = 0.904) was detected between the two groups. The tumor-to-IVC distance was an independent risk factor for radiofrequency ablation failure in HCC patients in the hepatocaval confluence (OR = 0.611, p = 0.022). Besides, tumor diameter was an independent risk factor for predicting LTP in patients with HCC in the hepatocaval confluence (HR = 2.209, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

HCC in the hepatocaval confluence can be effectively treated with radiofrequency ablation. To maximize treatment efficacy, the tumor-to-IVC distance and tumor diameter should be assessed before the operation begins.

Long-term outcomes of combined radiofrequency ablation and multipronged ethanol ablation for the treatment of unfavorable hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the local efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of combined radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and multipronged ethanol ablation (EA) in the treatment of unfavorable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to determine the prognostic factors for survival.

METHODS

Between August 2009 and December 2017, 98 patients with 110 unfavorable HCC nodules who underwent combined RFA and multipronged EA were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Unfavorable HCC was defined as a medium (3.1-5.0 cm) or large (5.1-7.0 cm) HCC nodule, a tumor located at a high-risk site, or a perivascular tumor. The treatment response, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to evaluate the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Complete ablation was obtained in 80.9% (89/110) of the tumors after initial treatment. Major complications were observed in 3 (3.1%) patients. The cumulative incidence of local tumor progression (LTP) was 23.5% at five years, and no variable was found to be an independent predictive factor for LTP. The five-year OS and RFS rates were 41.9% and 34.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the serum alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, presence of residual tumor after ablation, and extrahepatic metastases were significant prognostic factors for OS (P = 0.023, P = 0.030, P = 0.001, and P = 0.010, respectively). Tumor type and the number of tumors were predictive factors for RFS (P = 0.029 and P = 0.001, respectively). A perivascular tumor was not an independent predictive factor for OS or RFS.

CONCLUSION

Combined RFA and multipronged EA is a safe and effective treatment for unfavorable HCC, especially for perivascular tumors.

CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations after transarterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ¹²⁵I brachytherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and microwave ablation (MWA) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk locations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), this retrospectively study analyzed 49 patients who underwent TACE +MWA+¹²⁵I brachytherapy (group A) and 98 patients who only received TACE +MWA (group B). The evaluated outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment complications. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis survival was used to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

The patients in group A showed a longer PFS than group B (7.9 vs. 3.3 months, P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in median OS between the two groups (P = 0.928). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate of tumors in high-risk locations, and the ORR of intrahepatic tumors were 67.3%, 93.9%, and 51.0%, respectively, in group A, and 38.8%, 79.6% and 29.6%, respectively, in group B (P < 0.001, P = 0.025 and P = 0.011, respectively). TACE-MWA-¹²⁵I (HR = 0.479, P < 0.001) was a significant favorable prognostic factor that affected PFS. The present of portal vein tumor thrombosis was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 1.625, P = 0.040). The Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage (BCLC C vs. B) was an independent factor affecting OS (HR = 1.941, P = 0.038). The incidence of complications was similar between the two groups, except that the incidence of abdominal pain was reduced in the group A (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

TACE-MWA-¹²⁵I resulted in longer PFS and better tumor control than did TACE-MWA in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk locations.

Long-term efficacy and safety of microwave ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma adjacent to the gallbladder with a diameter ≤ 5 cm: a multicenter, propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) as first-line therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent versus nonadjacent to the gallbladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2006 to 2018, 657 patients with ≤5 cm HCC who underwent percutaneous ultrasound-guided MWA as first-line therapy from 5 hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were grouped into the adjacent group (n = 49) and the nonadjacent group (n = 608) according to whether the tumor was adjacent to the gallbladder. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables between the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patient pairs were matched after PSM. For the PSM cohort, during a median follow-up time of 60 months, there were no differences in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.011; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.647-1.578; p = 0.963) or OS (HR 0.925; 95% CI 0.522-1.639; p = 0.789) between the adjacent and nonadjacent groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the tumor adjacent to the gallbladder was not an independent risk factor for PFS or OS (all p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed comparable PFS and OS between the two groups in the <3 cm subgroup and the 3-5 cm subgroups (all p > 0.05). In addition to more use of assistive technology (p < 0.05), the adjacent group shared comparable local tumor progression, complications, technical success rate, and hospital stay (all p > 0.05) to the nonadjacent group.

CONCLUSION

There were comparable long-term efficacy and complications between patients with HCC adjacent and nonadjacent to the gallbladder treated with MWA.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma with stage C

BACKGROUND

The combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation (TACE-RFA) shows promising efficacy in large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Data on the clinical efficacy and safety of TACE-RFA for large HCC with barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage C are lacking in China.

AIM

To determine the safety and efficacy of TACE-RFA for large, advanced HCC.

METHODS

Patients of HCC with BCLC stage C who were treated with TACE-RFA or TACE alone at our institute from August 2008 to January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The complications were observed. The associations between overall survival (OS) and treatment method were analysed.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 102 HCC patients. Among them, 64 underwent TACE-RFA and 38 underwent TACE. The combination of TACE and RFA was safe. All complications were controllable. The median OS in the TACE-RFA group was significantly longer than that in the TACE group (8.0 mo vs 4.0 mo, P = 0.000). The 6-, 12- and 24-mo survival rates of the combination group were 68.8%, 34.4%, and 10.9%, respectively, while those of the TACE group were 36.8%, 7.9%, and 0% (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE-RFA has an advantage over TACE alone in improving OS in large HCC patients with BCLC stage C.

Meta-Analysis of Repeat Hepatectomy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary hepatic malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related death in both the developed and developing world. Recurrent HCC (rHCC) develops in a significant proportion of patients even following curative-intent resection. In the absence of a structured treatment algorithm, a number of treatment options including repeat hepatectomy (RH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been utilized in select patients with rHCC. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing RHR versus RFA for rHCC. Four electronic databases were screened until September 2022. A total of 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall and disease-free survival were comparable among the two groups. Patients undergoing RH were less likely to develop a second recurrence (RR 0.89, 95% C.I. 0.81 to 0.98, p = 0.02). Overall and major morbidity were significantly increased in the RH group (RR 3.01, 95% C.I. 1.98 to 4.56, p < 0.001 and RR 3.65, 95% C.I. 2.07 to 6.43, p < 0.001, respectively), while mortality was similar between RFA and RH. The data demonstrated that RFA is a safe and efficient alternative to RH for selected patients with rHCC. Nevertheless, despite higher morbidity associated with RH, repeat resection remains the preferred treatment option whenever feasible, as it allows for better local disease control.

Tumor location influences perioperative and oncologic outcomes in solitary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following curative resection: a multi-center analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes of patients with different locations of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

A total of 352 ICC patients underwent curative intent hepatectomy were included. Clinical outcomes were compared between ICC patients with tumors located at subcapsular and non-subcapsular, perihepatic vein (pHV) and non-pHV, or periportal vein (pPV) and non-pPV. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the influence of tumor location on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Surgical procedures for pPV ICC were associated with longer operative time and elevated intraoperative blood loss compared to non-pPV. Patients with pPV ICC significantly correlated to increased frequency of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) classification 3-4. In addition, the ICC located at pPV was correlated with both worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared to non-pPV, whereas no significant difference was observed between subcapsular and non-subcapsular or between pHV and non-pHV.

CONCLUSIONS

A pPV location contributed to poor perioperative outcomes and quick tumor recurrence for patients with solitary ICC undergoing curative resection. A pPV location also contributed to regional lymph node metastases and was a risk factor for intrahepatic recurrence. Subcapsular and pHV locations did not influence clinical outcomes of ICC patients.

Segmental Distribution of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Livers

Background: To evaluate the segmental distribution of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to Couinaud’s anatomical division in cirrhotic patients. Methods: Between 2020 and 2021, a total of 322 HCC nodules were diagnosed in 217 cirrhotic patients who underwent computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of suspicious nodules (>1 cm) detected during ultrasound surveillance. For each patient, the segmental position of the HCC nodule was recorded according to Couinaud’s description. The clinical data and nodule characteristics were collected. Results: A total of 234 (72.7%) HCC nodules were situated in the right lobe whereas 79 (24.5%) were detected in the left lobe (p < 0.0001) and only 9 nodules were in the caudate lobe (2.8%). HCC was most common in segment 8 (n = 88, 27.4%) and least common in segment 1 (n = 9, 2.8%). No significant differences were found in the frequencies of segmental or lobar involvement considering patient demographic and clinical characteristics, nodule dimension, or disease appearance. Conclusions: The intrahepatic distribution of HCC differs among Couinaud’s segments, with segment 8 being the most common location and segment 1 being the least common. The segmental distribution of tumour location was similar to the normal liver volume distribution, supporting a possible correlation between HCC location and the volume of hepatic segments and/or the volumetric distribution of the portal blood flow.

Ablation Difficulty Score: Proposal of a new tool to predict success rate of percutaneous ablation for hepatocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Identify the factors related to failure ablation after percutaneous ultrasound guided single electrode radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocarcinoma (HCC) and propose a score for improving patient selection and treatment allocation.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2020 585 HCC nodules treated with RFA were prospectively collected. Ablation Difficulty Score (ADS) was built-up according to clinical and radiological factors related to failure ablation identified by Cox-logistic regression analysis. The study population was stratified in low risk (ADS 0), intermediate risk (ADS 1), and high risk (ADS ≥ 2) of failure ablation.

RESULTS

Overall ablation success rate was 85.5%. Morbidity and mortality rates were 3.5% and 0.0%. According to per nodule analysis the following factors resulted related to failure ablation: size > 20 mm (p = 0.002), sub-capsular location (p = 0.008), perivascular location (p = 0.024), isoechoic appearance (p = 0.008), and non-cirrhotic liver (p = 0.009). The ablation success rate was 93.5% in ADS 0, 85.8% in ADS 1 and 71.3% in ADS ≥ 2 (p < 0.001). The 1-year local tumor progression (LTP) free survival was 90.2% in ADS 0, 80.6% in ADS 1, and 72.3% in ADS ≥ 2 (p = 0.009). Nodule's size > 20 mm (p = 0.014), isoechoic appearance (p = 0.012), perivascular location (p = 0.012) resulted related to lower LTP free survival.

CONCLUSION

Ablation Difficulty Score could be a simple and useful tool for guiding the treatment decision making of HCC. RFA in high risk nodules (ADS ≥ 2) should be carefully evaluated and reserved for patients not suitable for surgery or liver transplantation.

Survival benefits analyses of T1a renal cell carcinoma patients treated with microwave ablation

PURPOSE

The individual decision-making reference of Microwave ablation (MWA) for T1a RCC treatment is not clear, and it may not benefit all the patients equally. Therefore, we quantitatively evaluated the distinct survival benefits of patients with T1a RCC stratified by survival predictors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 237 patients with T1a RCC who underwent MWA over the last 16 years were retrospectively reviewed for survival benefit analysis. Cox proportional hazard models were used to control for the prognostic variables of OS, CSS, and PFS. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank analysis. Linear extrapolation was used to compute median survival periods.

RESULTS

The OS benefit was significantly dependent on age (HR:2.499, 95% CI: 1.245-5.016, p = 0.010) and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score (HR:3.956, 95% CI, 1.409-11.110, p = 0.009). OS in patients aged <75 years or with an age-adjusted CCI score <7 was significantly prolonged (44.68, 65.55 months) compared to OS in patients aged ≥75 years or with CCI score ≥7 (p < 0.001 for both). PFS benefit was significantly dependent on age-adjusted CCI (HR:3.325, 95% CI, 1.390-7.956, p = 0.007), patient type (HR:0.4, 95% CI, 0.214-0.745, p = 0.004), and tumour growth pattern (HR:12.562, 95% CI, 1.552-101.696, p = 0.018). PFS in incipient patients was significantly prolonged (33.75 months) compared to that in the relapsed patients (p = 0.037). Patients with an age-adjusted CCI score <7 or without tumour protruding into the renal pelvis, lived free from recurrence or metastasis (55.69 or 101.61 months) longer than that in patients with an age-adjusted CCI score ≥7 or with tumour protruding into the renal pelvis (p < 0.01 for both). None of the variables was associated with CSS benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

The OS and PFS benefits from MWA were not equal for all T1a RCC patients. Age ≥75 years and age-adjusted CCI ≥ 7 significantly shortened OS. Age-adjusted CCI ≥ 7, relapsed RCC, and RCC protruding into the renal pelvis significantly shortened the PFS period. For a better survival prognosis, appropriate patient triage is still needed.

Radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in subcapsular location: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Repeat hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are widely used to treat early recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) located in the subcapsular region, but the optimal treatment strategy remains to be controversial.

Methods

A total of 126 RHCC patients in the subcapsular location after initial radical hepatectomy were included in this study between Dec 2014 and Jan 2018. These patients were divided into the RFA group (46 cases) and the repeat hepatectomy group (80 cases). The primary endpoints include repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was complications. The propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize the bias. Complications were evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and severe complications were defined as classification of complications of ≥grade 3.

Results

There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe complications were observed between RFA group and repeat hepatectomy group in rRFS and OS both before (1-, 2-, and 3-year rRFS rates were 65.2%, 47.5%, and 33.3% vs 72.5%, 51.2%, and 39.2%, respectively, P = 0.48; 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 93.5%, 80.2%, and 67.9% vs 93.7%, 75.8%, and 64.2%, respectively, P = 0.92) and after PSM (1-, 2-, and 3-year rRFS rates were 68.6%, 51.0%, and 34.0% vs 71.4%, 42.9%, and 32.3%, respectively, P = 0.78; 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 94.3%, 82.9%, and 71.4% vs 88.6%, 73.8%, and 59.0%, respectively, P = 0.36). Moreover, no significant differences in the incidence of severe complications were observed between the RFA group and repeat hepatectomy group.

Conclusion

Both repeat hepatectomy and RFA are shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of RHCC located in the subcapsular region.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02277-4.

Caudate Lobe Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sequential Transarterial Chemoembolization and Iodine 125 Seeds Implantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Purpose

Resection of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe (CL) is challenging even for accomplished surgeons. This retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and iodine 125 seeds implantation (ISI) for unresectable or “ablation unsuitable” HCC-CL detected at the initial presentation in clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

A total of 20 HCC-CL patients undergoing sequential TACE and ISI from January 2014 to October 2018 were enrolled in this study. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response rate, and complication rates were analyzed and compared to non-caudate lobe (NCL) HCC patients. Multivariate analyses for potential clinical and radiological factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%, as all the patients received 28 ISI treatments. The median OS was 35 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 100%, 63.2%, and 11.1%, respectively. The median PFS was 16 months. The objective response rate was 60.0%. The puncture tract bleeding (2/20) and pneumothorax (1/20) were the most common complications in operation, but no operation-related deaths occurred. One year after the surgery, biliary tract injury occurred in 1 patient, necessitating percutaneous biliary intervention. No statistical difference was observed between the CL and NCL groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B and tumor size >3 cm were two significant factors associated with OS.

Conclusion

Sequential TACE and ISI were associated with the survival benefits in HCC-CL and should be considered as a reliable therapy for surgeons and interventional radiologists.

Sequential transarterial chemoembolization and early radiofrequency ablation improves clinical outcomes for early-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma in a 10-year single-center comparative study

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective treatment methods for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is still a lack of clinical research on whether early sequential RFA, compared with late combination therapy, can improve the long-term efficacy of initial TACE treatment.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated a cohort of patients who underwent combination therapy using TACE and RFA (TACE followed by RFA) from January 2010 to January 2020 at our medical centre. A total of 96 patients underwent TACE combined with early RFA (usually during the first hospitalization), which was called TACE + eRFA. Thirty-four patients received 1–2 palliative TACE treatments first and then underwent TACE treatment combined with late RFA (TACE + lRFA). All patients continued to receive palliative TACE treatments after intrahepatic lesion progression until reaching intolerance. The overall survival (OS) rate, time to tumour progression (TTP), tumour response rate and major complication rates were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were significant differences in the median OS (46 months vs 33 months; P = 0.013), median TTP (28 months vs 14 months; P < 0.00), objective response rate (ORR) (89.6% vs 61.8%, P = 0.000) and disease control rate (DCR) (94.8% vs 73.5% P = 0.002) between the two groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage was an independent risk factor for OS. Meanwhile, multivariable analysis revealed that TACE + eRFA was associated with an enhanced TTP.

Conclusion

Early sequential RFA treatment in patients with early-intermediate HCC can improve local tumour control and clinical outcomes while reducing the frequency of TACE treatment. In clinical practice, in HCC patients initially treated with TACE, it is recommended to combine RFA as soon as possible to obtain long-term survival.

Micronvasive behaviour of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: which treatment?

BACKGROUND

Microinvasion (MI), defined as infiltration of the portal or hepatic vein or bile duct and intrahepatic metastasis are accurate indicators of a poor prognosis for mall hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). A previous study showed that intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) definition of MI-HCC had a high concordance with histological findings. Aim of this study is to evaluate overall survival and recurrence patterns of patients with MI-HCC submitted to hepatic resection (HR) or laparoscopic ablation therapies (LAT).

METHODS

A total of 171 consecutive patients (78 h; 93 LAT) with single, small HCC (< 3 cm) with a MI pattern at IOUS examination were compared analyzing overall survival and recurrence patterns using univariate and multivariate analysis and weighting by propensity score.

RESULTS

Overall recurrences were similar in the 2 groups (HR: 51 patients (65%); LAT: 66 patients (71%)). The rate of local tumor progression in the HR group was very low (5 pts; 6%) in comparison to LAT group (22 pts; 24%; p = 0.002). The overall survival curves of HR are significantly better than that of the LAT group (p = 0.0039). On the propensity score Cox model, overall mortality was predicted by the surgical treatment with a Hazard ratio 1.68 (1.08-2.623) (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

If technically feasible and in patients fit for surgery, HR with an adequate tumor margin should be preferred to LAT in patients with MI-HCC at IOUS evaluation, to eradicate MI features near the main nodule, which are relatively frequent even in small HCC (< 3 cm).

Small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation by using propensity score analysis

Objectives

We aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) as first-line therapies in patients with small single perivascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 144 eligible patients with small (≤ 3 cm) single perivascular (proximity to hepatic and portal veins) HCC who underwent RFA (N = 70) or MWA (N = 74) as first-line treatment were included. The overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local tumor progression (LTP) rates between the two ablation modalities were compared. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to reduce selection bias. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of hepatic vessels.

Results

After a median follow-up time of 38.2 months, there were no significant differences in OS (5-year OS: RFA 77.7% vs. MWA 74.6%; p = 0.600) and DFS (5-year DFS: RFA 24.7% vs. MWA 40.4%; p = 0.570). However, a significantly higher LTP rate was observed in the RFA group than the MWA group (5-year LTP: RFA 24.3% vs. MWA 8.4%; p = 0.030). IPTW-adjusted analyses revealed similar results. The treatment modality (RFA vs. MWA: HR 7.861, 95% CI 1.642–37.635, p = 0.010) was an independent prognostic factor for LTP. We observed a significant interaction effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on LTP (p = 0.034). For patients with periportal HCC, the LTP rate was significantly higher in the RFA group than in the MWA group (p = 0.045). However, this difference was not observed in patients with perivenous HCC (p = 0.116).

Conclusions

In patients with a small single periportal HCC, MWA exhibited better tumor control than RFA.

Key Points

• Microwave ablation exhibited better local tumor control than radiofrequency ablation for small single periportal hepatocellular carcinoma.

• There was a significant interaction between the treatment effect of ablation modality and type of peritumoral vessel on local tumor progression.

• The type of peritumoral vessel is vital in choosing ablation modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07571-5.

Can Immediately Treating Subcentimeter Hepatocellular Carcinoma Improve the Survival of Patients?

Background

With the development of imaging technology, an increasing number of subcentimeter hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been detected. How to manage these lesions remains controversial and lacks evidence. We aimed to explore whether timely treating subcentimeter HCC is necessary considering the risks of false-positives and treatment failure.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we reviewed HCC patients treated with hepatectomy or ablation in our institution. Then, we enrolled 439 HCC patients with solitary lesion measuring up to 2 cm from November 1, 2009 to June 30, 2019. The baseline and clinical characteristics of these patients were collected. The patients were classified into primary and recurrent groups. The Kaplan–Meier method with Log-rank test was performed to compare the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between patients with subcentimeter HCC and those with HCC measuring 1–2 cm. Univariate and multivariate analyses were adopted to identify prognostic factors for survival.

Results

The OS and RFS did not differ significantly between patients with subcentimeter HCC and those with HCC measuring 1–2 cm in the primary group (p = 0.12 and 0.75). Similar results were found in the recurrent group. In multivariate analysis, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level were significantly associated with OS and RFS in the primary group. The serum AFP level was the only factor that correlated with OS and RFS in the recurrent group.

Conclusion

Routine screening for subcentimeter HCC is feasible. Considering uncertain diagnosis and treatment difficulties, it is more considerable to follow patients until lesions are larger than 1 cm and then provide curative treatments.

The effect of tumor location on long-term results of microwave ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To analyze the influence of tumor location, including tumor adjacency and located segments on long-term survival outcomes for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after microwave ablation (MWA).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 850 patients. The hepatic segments where the tumor is located, tumor adjacency (important tissues adjacent to tumor) and other clinical characteristics were collected. Overall survival (OS), local tumor progression (LTP) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared and analyzed. Influence of tumor location was evaluated by multi-models and the effect of adjacency for OS, LTP, and DFS in different segments was analyzed by stratification analysis.

RESULTS

The OS, LTP, and DFS rates were similar in different hepatic segments, so were in high risk and safe locations. In multi-models, HCC in segment 8 showed lower death rate of 43% than that in segment 2 (HR 0.57; P = 0.01) and tumors in segment 6 seemed to have lower LTP rate. Tumors in high-risk locations were risk factors for OS, LTP, and DFS compared with tumors in safe locations, but all differences were not significant in different models. The effects of tumor adjacency on survival outcomes among subgroups of segments were limited.

CONCLUSION

The tumor adjacency was not a prognostic factor of survival outcomes for patients with solitary tumors after MWA, but tumors in segment 8 seemed to better OS rate than tumors in other segments.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Both stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective local treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but whether RFA is superior to SBRT is still controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the treatment outcomes of SBRT with RFA as curable or bridge intention. Methods: We searched online databases for studies that compared treatment outcomes for SBRT and RFA. Eligibility criteria included evaluation of local control, overall survival (OS), transplant rate, and post-transplant pathological necrosis. Results: As no randomized clinical trials met the criteria, 10 retrospective studies with a total of 2,732 patients were included. Two studies were in favor of SBRT in local control, two studies preferred RFA in OS, and others reported comparable outcomes for both. SBRT demonstrated significantly higher 1- and 3-year local control than RFA [odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.74, P = 0.003; and OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.80, P = 0.002, respectively]. However, SBRT reported significantly shorter 1- and 2-year OS (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.21-1.90, P = 0.0003; and OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.38-2.01, P < 0.00001, respectively). As bridge treatment, no significant difference was shown in transplant rate and post-transplant pathological necrosis rate (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32-1.03, P = 0.060; and OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.13-1.82, P = 0.290, respectively). Conclusions: This study demonstrates SBRT is able to complete a better local control for HCC than RFA, though the OS is inferior to RFA because of tumor burden or liver profiles of the enrolled studies. Well-designed, randomized, multicenter trials will be required to further investigate the conclusion.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in challenging locations: oncologic outcomes and advanced assistive technology

Purpose: To assess the oncologic outcomes of the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in challenging locations (CLs) underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (US-PMWA) and the efficacy and safety of the advanced assistive technology (AAT).Materials and methods: Data for 489 treatment-naïve patients with HCC who met Milan criteria and subsequently underwent US-PMWA were reviewed from March 2012 to November 2016. According to the distance (<5 mm) between the tumor and surrounding structures, the patients were divided into two groups: a CL group and a non-CL group. Regarding MWA assisted by AAT, the CL group was further subdivided into two groups: an AAT group and a non-AAT group. Technique effectiveness, complications and survival outcomes (i.e., overall survival [OS] and recurrence-free survival [RFS]) were compared between CL and non-CL groups. Local tumor progression (LTP) was compared between AAT and non-AAT groups.Results: Technique effectiveness and complications in the CL group were similar to those in the non-CL group (p = .873 and p = .828, respectively). The OS and RFS in six types of CL groups were comparable with those in non-CL group (p = .131-.117) including adjacent vital structures, gallbladder, hepatic hilar regions, major vessels, diaphragm and capsule, respectively. The LTP rates in the AAT group were significantly higher than those in the non-AAT group (p = .001).Conclusions: US-PMWA assisted by AAT to treat HCC lesions in CLs was safe and effective; also, this technique had comparable success and survival outcomes with those of patients in non-CL.

Development and validation of a clinicopathological-based nomogram to predict seeding risk after percutaneous thermal ablation of primary liver carcinoma

Objectives

To develop a clinicopathological‐based nomogram to improve the prediction of the seeding risk of after percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) in primary liver carcinoma (PLC).

Methods

A total of 2030 patients with PLC who underwent PTA were included between April 2009 and December 2018. The patients were grouped into a training dataset (n = 1024) and an external validation dataset (n = 1006). Baseline characteristics were collected to identify the risk factors of seeding after PTA. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model based on the risk factors was used to develop the nomogram, which was used for assessment for its predictive accuracy using mainly the Harrell's C‐index and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

The median follow‐up time was 30.3 months (range, 3.2‐115.7 months). The seeding risk was 0.89% per tumor and 1.5% per patient in the training set. The nomogram was developed based on tumor size, subcapsular, α‐fetoprotein (AFP), and international normalized ratio (INR). The 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year cumulative seeding rates were 0.1%, 0.7% and 1.2% in the low‐risk group, and 1.7%, 6.3% and 6.3% in the high‐risk group, respectively, showing significant statistical difference (P < .001). The nomogram had good calibration and discriminatory abilities in the training set, with C‐indexes of 0.722 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.661, 0.883) and AUC of 0.850 (95% CI: 0.767, 0.934). External validation with 1000 bootstrapped sample sets showed a good C‐index of 0.706 (95% CI: 0.546, 0.866) and AUC of 0.736 (95% CI: 0. 646, 0.827).

Conclusions

The clinicopathological‐based nomogram could be used to quantify the probability of seeding risk after PTA in PLC.

Tescalcin is an unfavorable prognosis factor that regulats cell proliferation and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem and a primary cause of cancer‐related death worldwide. Although great advances have achieved recently by large‐scale high‐throughput analysis, the precise molecular mechanism underlying HCC progression remains to be clearly elucidated. We investigated the relationship between Tescalcin (TESC), a candidate oncogene, and clinicopathological features of HCC patients and explored the role of TECS in HCC development.

Methods

To identify new genes involved in HCC development, we analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas liver cancer database, and TESC was selected for further investigation. HCC tissue microarray analysis for TESC and its association with clinicopathological features were performed to investigate its clinical significance. TESC was knocked down by using short‐hairpin RNAs. Cell proliferation was analyzed by WST‐1 assay and cell counting. Cell apoptosis was tested by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting. A subcutaneous xenograft tumor model in nude mice was established to determine the in vivo function of TESC. Affymetrix microarray was used to identify its molecular mechanism.

Results

TESC was significantly increased in HCC tissues compared with the adjacent normal liver tissues. High expression of TESC was detected in 61 of 172 HCC patients by tissue microarray. Large tumor (> 5 cm) and elevated total bilirubin were associated with high TESC expression (both P < 0.050). In multivariate analysis, TESC was identified as an independent prognostic factor for short overall survival of HCC patients. TESC knockdown impaired HCC cell growth in vitro and in vivo. TESC knockdown significantly increased cell apoptosis in HCC cell lines. Furthermore, Affymetrix microarray analysis revealed that TESC knockdown inhibited tumor proliferation‐related pathways while activated cell death‐related pathways.

Conclusion

TESC was identified as an independent prognostic factor for short overall survival of HCC patients, and was critical for HCC cell proliferation and survival.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy after Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Residual tumor tissue after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is inevitable in clinical practice, and the optimal management of residual tumor after RFA has not been established. To evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a salvage therapy after incomplete RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we retrospectively included 32 HCC patients with an initial incomplete response (iIR) to RFA from May 2011 to August 2018. An iIR was defined as the presence of residual enhancement on CT or MRI one month after RFA treatment. The primary endpoint was local tumor control (LTC); the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. All patients fulfilled 6 fractions of SBRT as planned, with dosages ranging from 30 Gy to 54 Gy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0%. The 1- and 2-year LTC rates were 86.6% (95% CI, 74.3% to 98.9%) and 74.7% (95% CI, 55.9% to 93.5%), respectively. Fewer times of prior treatments was associated with better LTC (HR = 11.7, P=0.026). The 1- and 2-year PFS rate were 69.9% (95% CI, 53.4% to 86.4%) and 52.7% (95% CI, 33.1% to 72.3%), respectively. A higher Child-Pugh score was the only independent risk factor for tumor progression (HR = 5.17, P=0.012). The 1- and 3-year OS rate were 85.6% and 67.1%, respectively. Only two patients suffered grade 3 adverse events, and none experienced grade 4 or 5 events. In conclusion, for HCC patients confirmed to have an iIR to prior RFA, with compensated liver function, SBRT provided favorable LTC and OS along with acceptable toxicity.

Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation for ‎ Subcardiac Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Safety, Efficacy, Therapeutic Results and Risk Factors for Survival Outcomes

Objective

To investigate the clinical safety, efficacy, therapeutic outcomes and risk factors of computed tomography-guided percutaneous cryoablation (CT-PCRA) for subcardiac hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

In this study, patients with single HCC nodules located on the left lobe who subsequently underwent CT-PCRA were reviewed from July 2012 to August 2016. According to the definition of subcardiac HCC, the patients were grouped into the subcardiac HCC group (n=33) and the non-subcardiac HCC group (n=40). The technical success rates, tumour response rates, oncological outcomes including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and complications were compared. Multivariate analysis was performed on clinicopathological variables to identify factors affecting long-term outcomes.

Results

Seventy-three patients with subcardiac HCC were included in this study. After a median follow-up time of 37.8 months, 27.4% (20/73) of the patients died. The technical success and complete response rates were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 1.000; p = 0.590). The cumulative OS and RFS of the subcardiac HCC group were comparable to those of the non-subcardiac HCC group (p =0.820, p =0.922). Two major complications, intra-abdominal bleeding and right pleural effusion, were found at 2.2 and 3.1 months in the subcardiac HCC group, which were comparable with those in the non-subcardiac HCC group (p = 0.683). The multivariate analysis results showed that older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.382, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.884–7.823; p = 0.038) and ALBI grade 2–3 (HR: 3.398, 95% CI: 1.950–6.058; p = 0.021) may be predictors of poor OS and that tumour size ≥3 cm in diameter (HR: 3.302, 95% CI: 2.232–8.293; p = 0.012) may be a predictor of poor RFS.

Conclusion

CT-PCRA for subcardiac HCC can be performed safely and efficiently and contribute to improving survival prognosis.

Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Renal Insufficiency: Prognostic Role of Albumin-Bilirubin Grade

Renal insufficiency (RI) is commonly seen in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The prognostic role of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade in this special setting is unclear. We aimed to investigate the role of ALBI grade associated with the impact of RI on HCC. A prospective cohort of 3690 HCC patients between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine survival and independent prognostic predictors. Of all patients, RI was an independent predictor associated with decreased survival. In multivariate Cox analysis for patients with RI, α-fetoprotein level ≥20 ng/mL, tumor size >3 cm, vascular invasion, distant metastasis, presence of ascites, performance status 1-2, performance status 3-4, and ALBI grade 2 and grade 3 were independent predictors of decreased survival (all p < 0.05). In subgroup analysis of patients with RI undergoing curative and non-curative treatments, the ALBI grade remained a significant prognostic predictor associated with decreased survival (p < 0.001). In summary, HCC patients with RI have decreased survival compared to those without RI. The ALBI grade can discriminate the survival in patients with RI independent of treatment strategy and is a feasible prognostic tool in this special patient population.

Resection vs. ablation for lesions characterized as resectable-ablative within the colorectal liver oligometastases criteria: a propensity score matching from retrospective study

Background

There has been no prospective or retrospective studies reporting the comparison outcome between surgery and ablation for resectable-ablative (lesions could be treated by resection or complete ablation) colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and prognostic difference in patients who underwent R0 resection vs. complete ablation within the resectable-ablative CLOM criteria.

Methods

From January 2008 to May 2018, a total of 2,367 patients diagnosed with colorectal liver metastases were included in this observational study. The metastasis was characterized by only limited to liver with number ≤5, size ≤5 cm, and resectable-ablative (lesions could be treated by resection or complete ablation). The evaluated indications, including liver progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), survival rates, pattern and number of recurrences, and complications, were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM). The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and a log-rank test was performed. The Cox regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of outcomes.

Results

A total of 421 consecutive patients were eligible for this study, with 250 and 171 undergoing R0 resection and complete ablation, respectively. PSM identified 145 patients from each group. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 8-year OS rates in the resection group and the ablation group were 95.8% vs. 95.0%, 69.8% vs. 60.1%, 53.6% vs. 42.5%, and 45.1% vs. 32.9% (p = 0.075), respectively. The median LPFS in the resection group was significantly longer than that in the ablation group (35 months vs. 15 months, p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in LPFS between the two groups when comparing ≤3 cm liver metastases. For liver metastasis >3 cm, the median LPFS in the resection group and ablation group was 11 months and 5 months, respectively (p = 0.001). In terms of high risk of clinical risk score (CRS), the resection group showed longer LPFS than the ablation group (median 18 months vs. 10 months, p = 0.043).

Conclusion

For patients within the CLOM criteria suggesting that liver metastases were resectable as well as ablative, resection could result in longer liver recurrence-free survival than ablation in cases with size >3 cm or high risk of CRS. But for ≤3 cm liver metastases, their treatment efficacies were comparable.

Hepatic resection vs percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma abutting right diaphragm

BACKGROUND

It is usually difficult to adequately conduct percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency (RF) ablation for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) abutting the diaphragm. Our hypothesis was that the subphrenic location of HCC could have an effect on the long-term therapeutic outcomes after hepatic resection and RF ablation.

AIM

To compare the long-term therapeutic outcomes of hepatic resection and percutaneous RF ablation for HCCs abutting the diaphragm.

METHODS

A total of 143 Child-Pugh class A patients who had undergone hepatic resection (n = 80) or percutaneous ultrasound-guided RF ablation (n = 63) for an HCC (≤ 3 cm) abutting the right diaphragm were included. Cumulative local tumor progression (LTP), cumulative intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated. Prognostic factors for DFS and OS were analyzed. Complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The cumulative IDR rate, DFS rate, and OS rate for the hepatic resection group and RF ablation group at 5 years were “35.9% vs 65.8%”, “64.1% vs 18.3%”, and “88.4% vs 68.7%”, respectively. Hepatic resection was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (P ≤ 0.001; hazard ratio, 0.352; 95%CI: 0.205, 0.605; with RF ablation as the reference category); however, treatment modality was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. The LTP rate was 46.6% at 5 years for the RF ablation group. The major complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.630). The rate of occurrence of peritoneal seeding was higher in the RF ablation group (1.3% vs 9.5%, P = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Although OS was not significantly different between patients who had gone hepatic resection or percutaneous RF ablation for HCCs abutting the diaphragm, DFS was better in the hepatic resection group.