In Silico Approach for Immunohistochemical Evaluation of a Cytoplasmic Marker in Breast Cancer

Correlation Between ImageJ and Conventional Manual Scoring Methods for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Immuno-Histochemically Stained Sections

Background: One of the most frequently used methods for quantifying PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1) expression in tumor tissue is IHC (immunohistochemistry). This may predict the patient's response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy in cancer. Methods: ImageJ software was used to score IHC-stained sections for PD-L1 and compare the results with the conventional manual method. Results: In diffuse large B cell lymphoma, no significant difference between the scores obtained by the conventional method and ImageJ scores obtained using the option "RGB" or "Brightness/Contrast." On the other hand, a significant difference was found between the conventional and HSB scoring methods. ImageJ faced some challenges in analyzing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tissues because of tissue heterogenicity. A significant difference was found between the conventional and ImageJ scores using HSB or RGB but not with the "Brightness/Contrast" option. Scores obtained by ImageJ analysis after taking images using 20 × objective lens gave significantly higher readings compared to 40 × magnification. A significant difference between camera-captured images' scores and scanner whole slide images' scores was observed. Conclusion: ImageJ can be used to score homogeneous tissues. In the case of highly heterogeneous tissues, it is advised to use the conventional method rather than ImageJ scoring.

Application of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Risk of Recurrence of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Breast cancer is the most common disease among women, with over 2.1 million new diagnoses each year worldwide. About 30% of patients initially presenting with early stage disease have a recurrence of cancer within 10 years. Predicting who will have a recurrence and who will not remains challenging, with consequent implications for associated treatment. Artificial intelligence strategies that can predict the risk of recurrence of breast cancer could help breast cancer clinicians avoid ineffective overtreatment. Despite its significance, most breast cancer recurrence datasets are insufficiently large, not publicly available, or imbalanced, making these studies more difficult. This systematic review investigates the role of artificial intelligence in the prediction of breast cancer recurrence. We summarise common techniques, features, training and testing methodologies, metrics, and discuss current challenges relating to implementation in clinical practice. We systematically reviewed works published between 1 January 2011 and 1 November 2021 using the methodology of Kitchenham and Charter. We leveraged Springer, Google Scholar, PubMed, and IEEE search engines. This review found three areas that require further work. First, there is no agreement on artificial intelligence methodologies, feature predictors, or assessment metrics. Second, issues such as sampling strategies, missing data, and class imbalance problems are rarely addressed or discussed. Third, representative datasets for breast cancer recurrence are scarce, which hinders model validation and deployment. We conclude that predicting breast cancer recurrence remains an open problem despite the use of artificial intelligence.

How the variability between computer-assisted analysis procedures evaluating immune markers can influence patients' outcome prediction

Differences between computer-assisted image analysis (CAI) algorithms may cause discrepancies in the identification of immunohistochemically stained immune biomarkers in biopsies of breast cancer patients. These discrepancies have implications for their association with disease outcome. This study aims to compare three CAI procedures (A, B and C) to measure positive marker areas in post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy biopsies of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to explore the differences in their performance in determining the potential association with relapse in these patients. A total of 3304 digital images of biopsy tissue obtained from 118 TNBC patients were stained for seven immune markers using immunohistochemistry (CD4, CD8, FOXP3, CD21, CD1a, CD83, HLA-DR) and were analyzed with procedures A, B and C. The three methods measure the positive pixel markers in the total tissue areas. The extent of agreement between paired CAI procedures, a principal component analysis (PCA) and Cox multivariate analysis was assessed. Comparisons of paired procedures showed close agreement for most of the immune markers at low concentration. The probability of differences between the paired procedures B/C and B/A was generally higher than those observed in C/A. The principal component analysis, largely based on data from CD8, CD1a and HLA-DR, identified two groups of patients with a significantly lower probability of relapse than the others. The multivariate regression models showed similarities in the factors associated with relapse for procedures A and C, as opposed to those obtained with procedure B. General agreement among the results of CAI procedures would not guarantee that the same predictive breast cancer markers were consistently identified. These results highlight the importance of developing additional strategies to improve the sensitivity of CAI procedures.