Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Ovarian Carcinoma

[Reporting and handling of lymphonodectomy specimens in gynecologic malignancies and sentinel lymph nodes]

Die Aufarbeitung von Lymphonodektomiepräparaten gynäkologischer Malignome orientiert sich an den nationalen AWMF-Leitlinien und internationalen Empfehlungen. Die Definition von Mikrometastasen und isolierten Tumorzellen entspricht den Festlegungen der UICC(Union Internationale Contre le Cancer)/TNM(TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren). Deren Nachweis soll im Befundbericht erwähnt werden sowie in die Tumorklassifikation einfließen. Alle übersandten Lymphknoten (LK) sollen untersucht werden mit vollständiger Einbettung aller LK bis 0,3 cm und Lamellierung aller größeren Lymphknoten parallel zu ihrer kurzen Achse in ca. 0,2 cm dicken Scheiben. Bestandteile des histologischen Befundberichtes sind: Zahl der befallenen LK im Verhältnis zur Zahl der entfernten/untersuchten LK entsprechend der Entnahmelokalisationen, metrische Ausdehnung der größten LK-Metastase, Fehlen/Nachweis einer extrakapsulären Ausbreitung. Zuschnitt und Einbettung von Sentinel-LK mit oder ohne Schnellschnittuntersuchung erfolgt in Analogie zu Nicht-Sentinel-LK mit Anfertigung von ca. 3 HE-gefärbten Stufenschnitten in einem Abstand von ca. 200 µm sowohl vom Gefrier- als auch Paraffinblock. Stellen sich die Sentinel-LK in der HE-Färbung negativ dar, soll ein immunhistochemisches Ultrastaging erfolgen.

Characterization of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement and Its Clinicopathological Characteristics in Stage II-IIIA Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact and clinicopathological characteristics of extracapsular lymph node involvement (ECLNI) in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unknown in the context of the eighth edition N classification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients with stage II-IIIA LUAD who underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy. The correlations of ECLNI presence and clinicopathological profiles were analyzed. We also assessed the impact of ECLNI on the postoperative survival of pN1 and pN2 LUAD patients.

RESULTS

ECLNI-positive status was more common in patients with high lymph node yield and in patients with multiple stations involved. The logistic regression model identified tumor spread through air spaces, micropapillary component, cribriform component, and nodal stage as predictive factors for ECLNI presence. LUAD patients with ECLNI presence had an increased risk of locoregional recurrence compared with those without (p < 0.001). Presence of ECLNI was confirmed as an independent risk factor for worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001) in the entire cohort. Among the 61 patients with ECLNI(+)pN2 disease, our analysis revealed that adjuvant radiation was a significant predictor of improved RFS and OS. In addition, ECLNI status provides additional precision in stratifying pN1 and pN2 patients with significantly different RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that ECLNI remains a strong prognosticator of unfavorable OS and RFS for LUADs in the context of the eighth edition N classification. Adjuvant radiation should be actively considered for pN1b and pN2 LUAD patients with ECLNI presence.

The association between lymph node metastases and long-term survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

A key survival prognosis factor for patients treated for ovarian cancer is complete cytoreductive surgery where all macroscopic neoplastic implants, including enlarged metastatic lymph nodes, are removed. We presume that investigating the involvement of the lymphatic system can result in a more individualized approach to the treatment of ovarian cancer patients. The main aim of our study was to analyze the relationship between the presence, number and types of lymph node metastases and ovarian cancer patient prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent cytoreduction due to primary ovarian cancer, between 2010 and 2015. We analyzed the number of metastatic lymph nodes, the lymph node ratio defined as the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes removed, extracapsular involvement, and the histopathological pattern of metastases.

RESULTS

The study group included 651 patients. Of these, 377 had lymphadenectomy, 144 presented with lymph node metastases, and 233 had no lymph node metastases. We also included a group of 274 patients who did not have lymphadenectomy. Patients with more than 4 metastatic lymph nodes and a lymph node ratio of ≥ 0.1 had significantly poorer overall survival. Extracapsular involvement had no relation to patient overall survival. Multivariant survival analysis indicated that a lymph node ratio of ≥ 0.1 was an independent predictor of poor survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of lymph node metastases in ovarian cancer patients can have predictive value for patient overall survival.