Targeted Assessment of the EGFR Status as Reflex Testing in Treatment-Naive Non-Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients: A Single Laboratory Experience (LPCE, Nice, France)

Comprehensive analysis of next generation sequencing and ARMS-PCR for detecting EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Amivantamab (JNJ-372) and mobocertinib (TAK-788) have been reported to have favorable therapeutic effect for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. Thus, accurate detection of EGFR ex20ins mutations is crucial for subsequent individualized therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the two common methods of next generation sequencing (NGS) and amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) for detecting EGFR ex20ins mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed EGFR mutations, especially for ex20ins, in 3,606 NSCLC patients detected by NGS and 1,785 patients by ARMS.

Results

Among the 3,606 NGS patients, a total of 2,077 EGFR mutations and 95 EGFR ex20ins were identified, accounting for 57.6% and 2.6%, respectively. While 48.4% of EGFR mutations and 1.1% of ex20ins were detected in 1,785 ARMS patients, which were significantly lower than those of NGS (P<0.01). Thirty-four unique ex20ins variants were identified by NGS, and eight of them was reported for the first time. However, ARMS was designed to detect only several known EGFR ex20ins variants, and even did not include the most common variants in Chinese NSCLC patients.

Conclusions

NGS is more advantageous and strongly recommended for the detection of EGFR ex20ins mutations. Considering the fast and cost-effective ARMS detection method, it is suggested that the primers design should be updated according to the characteristics of EGFR ex20ins mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients.

FACILITATE: A real-world, multicenter, prospective study investigating the utility of a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR assay versus local reference methods for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor variants in NSCLC

Accurate testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variants is essential for informing treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Automated diagnostic workflows may allow more streamlined initiation of targeted treatments, where appropriate, while comprehensive variant analysis is ongoing. FACILITATE, a real-world, prospective, multicenter, European study, evaluated performance and analytical turnaround time of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test compared with local reference methods. Sixteen sites obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy samples with ≥ 10% neoplastic cells from patients with NSCLC. Consecutive 5 μm sections from patient samples were tested for clinically relevant NSCLC-associated EGFR variants using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and local reference methods; performance (concordance) and analytical turnaround time were compared. Between January 2019 and November 2020, 1,474 parallel analyses were conducted. Overall percentage agreement was 97.7% [n = 1,418; 95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.3], positive agreement, 87.4% (n = 182; 95% CI: 81.8-91.4) and negative agreement, 99.2% (n = 1,236; 95% CI: 98.5-99.6). There were 38 (2.6%) discordant cases. Ninety percent of results were returned with an analytical turnaround time of within 1 week using the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test versus ∼22 days using reference methods. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test performed well versus local methods and had shorter analytical turnaround time. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test can thus support application of personalized medicine in NSCLC.

From tumor mutational burden to characteristic targets analysis: Identifying the predictive biomarkers and natural product interventions in cancer management

High-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides insights into genome-wide mutations and can be used to identify biomarkers for the prediction of immune and targeted responses. A deeper understanding of the molecular biological significance of genetic variation and effective interventions is required and ultimately needs to be associated with clinical benefits. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients in two cancer cohorts who underwent NGS in a “real-world” setting. The association between differences in tumor mutational burden (TMB) and clinical presentation was evaluated. We aimed to identify several key mutation targets and describe their biological characteristics and potential clinical value. A pan-cancer dataset was downloaded as a verification set for further analysis and summary. Natural product screening for the targeted intervention of key markers was also achieved. The majority of tumor patients were younger adult males with advanced cancer. The gene identified with the highest mutation rate was TP53, followed by PIK3CA, EGFR, and LRP1B. The association of TMB (0–103.7 muts/Mb) with various clinical subgroups was determined. More frequent mutations, such as in LRP1B, as well as higher levels of ferritin and neuron-specific enolase, led to higher TMB levels. Further analysis of the key targets, LRP1B and APC, was performed, and mutations in LRP1B led to better immune benefits compared to APC. APC, one of the most frequently mutated genes in gastrointestinal tumors, was further investigated, and the potential interventions by cochinchinone B and rottlerin were clarified. In summary, based on the analysis of the characteristics of gene mutations in the “real world,” we obtained the potential association indicators of TMB, found the key signatures LRP1B and APC, and further described their biological significance and potential interventions.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Idylla GeneFusion in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Targeted therapy in lung cancer requires the assessment of multiple oncogenic driver alterations, including fusion genes. This retrospective study evaluated the Idylla GeneFusion prototype, an automated and ease-of-use (<2 minutes) test, with a short turnaround time (3 hours) to detect fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1/2/3 genes and MET exon 14 skipping. This multicenter study (18 centers) included 313 tissue samples from lung cancer patients with 97 ALK, 44 ROS1, 20 RET, and 5 NTRKs fusions, 32 MET exon 14 skipping, and 115 wild-type samples, previously identified with reference methods (RNA-based next generation sequencing/fluorescence in situ hybridization/quantitative PCR). Valid results were obtained for 306 cases (98%), overall concordance between Idylla and the reference methods was 89% (273/306); overall sensitivity and specificity were 85% (165/193) and 96% (108/113), respectively. Discordances were observed in 28 samples, where Idylla did not detect the alteration identified by the reference methods; and 5 samples where Idylla identified an alteration not detected by the reference methods. All of the ALK-, ROS1-, and RET-specific fusions and MET exon 14 skipping identified by Idylla GeneFusion were confirmed by reference method. To conclude, Idylla GeneFusion is a clinically valuable test that does not require a specific infrastructure, allowing a rapid result. The absence of alteration or the detection of expression imbalance only requires additional testing by orthogonal methods.

Setting Up an Ultra-Fast Next-Generation Sequencing Approach as Reflex Testing at Diagnosis of Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Experience of a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France)

The number of genomic alterations required for targeted therapy of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients has increased and become more complex these last few years. These molecular abnormalities lead to treatment that provides improvement in overall survival for certain patients. However, these treated tumors inexorably develop mechanisms of resistance, some of which can be targeted with new therapies. The characterization of the genomic alterations needs to be performed in a short turnaround time (TAT), as indicated by the international guidelines. The origin of the tissue biopsies used for the analyses is diverse, but their size is progressively decreasing due to the development of less invasive methods. In this respect, the pathologists are facing a number of different challenges requiring them to set up efficient molecular technologies while maintaining a strategy that allows rapid diagnosis. We report here our experience concerning the development of an optimal workflow for genomic alteration assessment as reflex testing in routine clinical practice at diagnosis for NS-NSCLC patients by using an ultra-fast-next generation sequencing approach (Ion Torrent Genexus Sequencer, Thermo Fisher Scientific). We show that the molecular targets currently available to personalized medicine in thoracic oncology can be identified using this system in an appropriate TAT, notably when only a small amount of nucleic acids is available. We discuss the new challenges and the perspectives of using such an ultra-fast NGS in daily practice.

Reflex testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma using DNA- and RNA-based next-generation sequencing-a single-center experience

Background

Targeted treatment modalities for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients are expanding rapidly and demand a constant adaptation of molecular testing strategies. In this regard, broad reflex testing via next-generation sequencing (NGS) might have several advantages. However, real-world data regarding practical feasibility and clinical relevance are scarce, especially for RNA-based NGS.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study comparing NGS use in two consecutive years (2019 and 2020). In 2019, reflex testing mainly consisted of DNA-based NGS for mutations and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ALK, ROS1, and NTRK fusion products. At the beginning of 2020, our approach has changed, with DNA- and RNA-based NGS panels now being simultaneously performed. This change in protocol allowed us to retrospectively evaluate if broad molecular reflex testing brings additional value to lung cancer patients.

Results

Within the whole cohort (n=432), both DNA- and RNA-based NGS yielded almost always evaluable results. Only in 6 cases, the RNA content was too little for an appropriate analysis. After integrating RNA-based NGS in the reflex testing approach, the number of detected fusions increased significantly (2.6% vs. 8.2%; P=0.0021), but also more patients received targeted therapies. Furthermore, exceedingly rare alterations were more likely to be detected, including the so far undescribed EGFR-NUP160 fusion.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that a comprehensive approach to reflex NGS testing is practically feasible and clinically relevant. Including RNA-based panels in the reflex testing approach results in more detected fusions and more patients receiving targeted therapies. Additionally, this broad molecular profiling strategy identifies patients with emerging biomarkers, underscoring its usefulness in the rapidly evolving landscape of targeted therapies.

Contribution of the IdyllaTM System to Improving the Therapeutic Care of Patients with NSCLC through Early Screening of EGFR Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotyping, a critical examen for the treatment decisions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is commonly assayed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), but this global approach takes time. To determine whether rapid EGFR genotyping tests by the Idylla^TM system guides earlier therapy decisions, EGFR mutations were assayed by both the Idylla^TM system and NGS in 223 patients with NSCLC in a bicentric prospective study. Idylla^TM demonstrated agreement with the NGS method in 187/194 cases (96.4%) and recovered 20 of the 26 (77%) EGFR mutations detected using NGS. Regarding the seven missed EGFR mutations, five were not detected by the Idylla^TM system, one was assayed in a sample with insufficient tumoral cells, and the last was in a sample not validated by the Idylla^TM system (a bone metastasis). Idylla^TM did not detect any false positives. The average time between EGFR genotyping results from Idylla^TM and the NGS method was 9.2 ± 2.2 working days (wd) (12.6 ± 4.0 calendar days (cd)). Subsequently, based on the Idylla^TM method, the timeframe from tumor sampling to the initiation of EGFR-TKI was 7.7 ± 1.2 wd (11.4 ± 3.1 cd), while it was 20.3 ± 6.7 wd (27.2 ± 8.3 cd) with the NGS method (p < 0.001). We thus demonstrated here that the Idylla^TM system contributes to improving the therapeutic care of patients with NSCLC by the early screening of EGFR mutations.

Use of the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test for Variant Detection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Samples

OBJECTIVES

Stratified management of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) through epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) variant analysis has become standard clinical practice. The Idylla system is a fully compliant European in vitro diagnostics device, a fully automated platform designed to rapidly genotype formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. This retrospective study aims to validate the Idylla EGFR Mutation Test for use with extracted DNA from known NSCLC samples.

METHODS

In this study, 20 µL of archival extracted DNA was placed directly inside the Idylla EGFR assay single-use cartridge. Idylla results were compared with the original Sanger sequencing reference method.

RESULTS

The Idylla EGFR Mutation Test yielded valid results for all samples tested, confirming the variants identified by the reference method that lay within the Idylla target range. No false-positive cases were noted with the Idylla assay. Variant genotype reports were obtained within 150 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

The Idylla EGFR assay is sensitive for extracted DNA and can be reliably applied to cytologic specimens, enabling its implementation as an ancillary first-line test for patients with NSCLC.

EGFR Status Assessment for Better Care of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: What Is Changing in the Daily Practice of Pathologists?

The recent emergence of novel neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies for early stage (I-IIIA) non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), mainly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR mutations and immunotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy, has suddenly required the evaluation of biomarkers predictive of the efficacy of different treatments in these patients. Currently, the choice of one or another of these treatments mainly depends on the results of immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 and of the status of EGFR and ALK. This new development has led to the setup of different analyses for clinical and molecular pathology laboratories, which have had to rapidly integrate a number of new challenges into daily practice and to establish new organization for decision making. This review outlines the impact of the management of biological samples in laboratories and discusses perspectives for pathologists within the framework of EGFR TKIs in early stage NSCLC.

What Is New in Biomarker Testing at Diagnosis of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma? Implications for Cytology and Liquid Biopsy

The discovery and clinical validation of biomarkers predictive of the response of non-squamous non-small-cell lung carcinomas (NS-NSCLC) to therapeutic strategies continue to provide new data. The evaluation of novel treatments is based on molecular analyses aimed at determining their efficacy. These tests are increasing in number, but the tissue specimens are smaller and smaller and/or can have few tumor cells. Indeed, in addition to tissue samples, complementary cytological and/or blood samples can also give access to these biomarkers. To date, it is recommended and necessary to look for the status of five genomic molecular biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600, NTRK) and of a protein biomarker (PD-L1). However, the short- and more or less long-term emergence of new targeted treatments of genomic alterations on RET and MET, but also on others’ genomic alteration, notably on KRAS, HER2, NRG1, SMARCA4, and NUT, have made cellular and blood samples essential for molecular testing. The aim of this review is to present the interest in using cytological and/or liquid biopsies as complementary biological material, or as an alternative to tissue specimens, for detection at diagnosis of new predictive biomarkers of NS-NSCLC.

A rapid near-patient RT-PCR test for suspected COVID-19: a study of the diagnostic accuracy

Background

Management of large numbers of reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) for diagnosis of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) requires robust infrastructures, located in dedicated premises with a high standard of biosafety procedures, and well-trained personnel. The handling of a “run-of-river sample” to obtain rapid reporting of results is challenging.

Methods

We studied the clinical performance of the Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test (index test) on a platform capable of fully automated nucleic acid testing including extraction, amplification, and detection in a single-use cartridge to establish the diagnosis of COVID-19. The study was conducted on a prospective cohort of 112 volunteers with recent symptoms and an unknown SARS-CoV-2 status who came to free screening centers of the Nice metropolitan area. All subjects underwent bilateral nasopharyngeal sampling. One sample was processed using the index test, the other using the standard of care RT-PCR. Samples were treated blind.

Results

Most of the participants (70%) were sampled within 4 days of symptom onset. Forty-five (40.2%) were positive for COVID-19. No clinical symptoms were distinguished between SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive and negative subjects except anosmia and dysgeusia. Positive and negative agreement between the index and the standard of care test was 100%.

Conclusions

The Idylla™ SARS-CoV-2 Test is very sensitive, specific, rapid and easy to use in a near-patient RT-PCR approach to distinguish between symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients in selected settings.

Predictive molecular pathology in non-small cell lung cancer in France: The past, the present and the perspectives

The advent of molecular targets for novel therapeutics in oncology, notably for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), led the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) to establish a national network of 28 hospital Molecular Genetics Centers for Cancer (MGCC) in 2007. In each University in France, laboratories were established to develop molecular biology testing to evaluate a few genomic alterations, initially a selection of genes, by using specific targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. In a second phase, the number of studied genes was increased. In 2015, the MGCC benefited from an additional dedicated budget from the INCa to develop next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. In the meantime, a new financial regulation for innovative testing has been established for the acts out of nomenclature. Consequently, all private and public laboratories in France have access to funding for molecular biology testing in oncology. The gene-based PCR assays or NGS tests have benefitted from reimbursement of cost testing by the INCa. Today, the laboratories consider this reimbursement to be only partial, and its use to be complex. In 2018, a strategic plan for medical genomic analyses (France Médecine Génomique 2025) was implemented to introduce more systematic sequencing into the health care pathway and oncology practice. The large panel of molecular tests should be centralized to a limited number of molecular genetic centers. This review describes the evolution of the different stages of implementation of molecular pathology testing for NSCLC patients over the last few years in France.

Rapid EGFR evaluation from used H&E, IHC and FISH diagnostic slides with the Idylla platform

AIMS

Diagnostic tumour samples are mandatory for morphologic and molecular diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to establish the best therapeutic approach. In the presence of small tumour tissue sample, the pathologist needs to make responsible choices to achieve a correct diagnosis and save material for subsequent molecular evaluations. Nevertheless, in some instances, the diagnostic process can lead to tissue depletion. The automated Idylla epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation test has been developed to rapidly process formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) pathologic material, without previous DNA extraction. This study aimed to test whether this platform is suitable for the reuse of H&E, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) diagnostic slides.

METHODS

A training set of 19 FFPE tissues with known EGFR status was revaluated on H&E slides. Fourteen of them were also tested using IHC and FISH treated specimens. An additional series of 25 H&E, IHC or FISH slides of NSCLC cases tested for EGFR mutation at an external institution was blindly assessed as a validation cohort.

RESULTS

Combining the two sets, 32 of 32 classical ex19dels and p.L858R were correctly identified. Three uncommon mutations (p.G719X, p.L861Q and ex20ins) were also detected. Four discrepancies were related to rare ex19del/ins not included in the Idylla list of detectable mutations. Two p.T790M variants were missed on one FFPE and two H&E slides but were detected using IHC and FISH sections from the same FFPE blocks.

CONCLUSIONS

The Idylla EGFR mutation test is highly reliable using differently treated tumour specimens and should be validated in larger studies.

Rapid EGFR Mutation Detection Using the Idylla Platform: Single-Institution Experience of 1200 Cases Analyzed by an In-House Developed Pipeline and Comparison with Concurrent Next-Generation Sequencing Results

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the most common targetable alterations in lung adenocarcinoma. To facilitate rapid testing, the Idylla EGFR assay was incorporated as a screening method before next-generation sequencing (NGS). Validation and experience using an in-house developed analysis pipeline, enhanced with a manual review algorithm is described. Results are compared with corresponding NGS results. In all, 1249 samples were studied. Validation demonstrated 98.57% (69/70) concordance with the reference methods. The limit of detection varied from 2% to 5% variant allele frequency for total EGFR quantitation cycle between 20 and 23. Of the 1179 clinical cases, 23.41% were EGFR-positive by Idylla. Concurrent NGS was successfully performed on 94.9% (799/842) requests. Concordance of Idylla with NGS was 98.62% (788/799) and 98.50% (787/799) using our in-house and Idylla analysis pipelines, respectively. Discordances involved missed mutations by both assays associated with low tumor/low input. Incorporating a manual review algorithm to supplement automated calls improved accuracy from 98.62% to 99.37% and sensitivity from 94.68% to 97.58%. Overall reporting time, from receipt of material to official clinical report, ranged from 1 to 3 days. Therefore, Idylla EGFR testing enables rapid and sensitive screening without compromising subsequent comprehensive NGS, when required. Automated calling, enhanced with a manual review algorithm, reduces false-negative calls associated with low tumor/low input samples.