The Validity and Predictive Value of Blood-Based Biomarkers in Prediction of Response in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Clinical Validity and Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Testing in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC): A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has become a promising tool to guide first-line (1L) targeted treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This study aims to estimate the clinical validity (CV) and clinical utility (CU) of ctDNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for oncogenic driver mutations to inform 1L treatment decisions in aNSCLC through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase to identify randomized control trials or observational studies reporting CV/CU on ctDNA testing in patients with aNSCLC. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects models to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) was summarized for CU studies.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were identified: 17 CV only, 2 CU only, and 1 both, and 13 studies were included for the meta-analysis on multi-gene detection. The overall sensitivity and specificity for ctDNA detection of any mutation were 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.74) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00), respectively. However, sensitivity varied greatly by driver gene, ranging from 0.29 (95% CI 0.13-0.53) for ROS1 to 0.77 (95% CI 0.63-0.86) for KRAS. Two studies that compared PFS with ctDNA versus tissue-based testing followed by 1L targeted therapy found no significant differences. One study reported OS curves on ctDNA-matched and tissue-matched therapies but no hazard ratios were provided.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA testing demonstrated an overall acceptable diagnostic accuracy in patients with aNSCLC, however, sensitivity varied greatly by driver mutation. Further research is needed, especially for uncommon driver mutations, to better understand the CU of ctDNA testing in guiding targeted treatments for aNSCLC.

Clinical validity and utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has become a promising tool to guide first-line (1L) targeted treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). This study aims to estimate the clinical validity (CV) and clinical utility (CU) of ctDNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) for oncogenic driver mutations to inform 1L treatment decisions in aNSCLC through a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase to identify randomized control trials or observational studies reporting CV/CU on ctDNA testing in patients with aNSCLC. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects models to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) was summarized for CU studies.

Results

Eighteen studies were identified: 17 CV only, 2 CU only, and 1 both. Thirteen studies were included for the meta-analysis on multi-gene detection. The overall sensitivity and specificity for ctDNA detection of any mutation were 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.74) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00) respectively. However, sensitivity varied greatly by driver gene, ranging from 0.29 (95% CI, 0.13-0.53) for ROS 1 to 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.86) for KRAS . Two studies compared PFS with ctDNA versus tissue-based testing followed by 1L targeted therapy found no significant differences. One study reported OS curves on ctDNA-matched and tissue-matched therapies but no hazard ratios were provided.

Conclusion

ctDNA testing demonstrated an overall acceptable diagnostic accuracy in aNSCLC patients, however, sensitivity varied greatly by driver mutation. Further research is needed, especially for uncommon driver mutations, to better understand the CU of ctDNA testing in guiding targeted treatments for aNSCLC.

Circulating Tumor DNA Monitoring Reveals Molecular Progression before Radiologic Progression in a Real-life Cohort of Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The clinical potential of liquid biopsy in patients with advanced cancer is real-time monitoring for early detection of treatment failure. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical validity of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) treatment monitoring in a real-life cohort of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced or noncurative locally advanced NSCLC were prospectively included in an exploratory study (NCT03512847). Selected cancer-specific mutations were measured in plasma by standard or uniquely designed droplet digital PCR assays before every treatment cycle during first-line treatment until progressive disease (PD). Correlation between an increase in ctDNA (= molecular progression) and radiologic PD was investigated, defined as lead time, and the corresponding numbers of likely futile treatment cycles were determined. Utility of ctDNA measurements in clarifying the results of nonconclusive radiologic evaluation scans was evaluated.

RESULTS

Cancer-specific mutations and longitudinal plasma sampling were present in 132 of 150 patients. ctDNA was detectable in 88 (67%) of 132 patients treated by respectively chemotherapy (n = 41), immunotherapy (n = 43), or combination treatment (n = 4). In 66 (90%) of 73 patients experiencing PD, a ctDNA increase was observed with a median lead time of 1.5 months before radiologic PD. Overall, 119 (33%) of 365 treatment cycles were administered after molecular progression. In addition, ctDNA measurements could clarify the results in 38 (79%) of 48 nonconclusive radiologic evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA monitoring leads to earlier detection of treatment failure, and clarifies the majority of nonconclusive radiologic evaluations, giving the potential of sparing patients from likely futile treatments and needless adverse events.

SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment monitoring by ctDNA has the clinical potential to reveal PD before radiologic evaluation and consequently spare patients with advanced cancer from likely ineffective, costly cancer treatments and adverse events.

Liquid Biopsy, an Everchanging Balance between Clinical Utility and Emerging Technologies

To date, tissue biopsy still represents the mainstay for tumor diagnosis and molecular characterization [...].

Genomic Alteration Spectrum of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in East-China Characterized by Tumor Tissue DNA and Cell-Free DNA

Introduction

From an oncologic perspective, genetic detection is becoming a frontline clinical test, used to identify actionable alterations for targeted therapy, monitor molecular clonal tumor evolution, indicate disease progression and prognosis, and predict medication efficacy and resistance. From analysis of both tumor tissue and cell-free DNA from a large cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients in East-China, we characterized the full spectrum of genomic alterations.

Methods

The study comprised 3000 unpaired samples including 1351 tumor tissue DNA (tDNA) and 1649 cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) samples, from which 67 cancer-related genes were sequenced and the genetic alteration profiles were depicted. Integrative molecular analyses identified the frequently mutated genes, uncovered co-occurring somatic alterations, described the distribution of hotspot variants, analyzed the frequency of variant alleles, and notably distinguished actionable, novel variants.

Results

The most commonly affected genes were EGFR, TP53, KRAS, CDKN2A, and PIK3CA in both tDNA and cfDNA samples. EGFR and CTNNB1, PIK3CA and PTEN, ERBB2 and SMO were found to have frequent co-occurring alterations in tDNA samples, while EGFR and SMO, KRAS and PDGFRA, PIK3CA and KDR were in cfDNA samples. A large number of primary druggable variants were identified in tDNA samples, while numerous drug-resistance variants, rare actionable variants, and non-EGFR actionable variants were detected in cfDNA samples. Novel variants were enriched in KDR, KIT, TP53, ABL1, FGFR1 in tDNA samples while the majority of novel variants were distributed in PDGFRA, EGFR, KIT, ROS1, BRCA2 in cfDNA samples. Variant allele frequency in tDNA samples was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than that in cfDNA samples.

Conclusion

The results revealed considerable differences in the alteration characteristics between the two kinds of specimens. To date, this study represents the largest real-world investigation of its kind, derived from the largest number of patients in East-China. It reinforced and expanded the mechanism of molecular analysis of neoplastic genetic profiles.

Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients on Immunotherapy-The Role of Liquid Biopsy in Unraveling the Puzzle

In the last decade, immunotherapy has been one of the most important advances in the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment landscape. Nevertheless, only a subset of NSCLC patients benefits from it. Currently, the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved diagnostic test for first-line immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC patients uses tissue biopsies to determine the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. However, obtaining tumor tissue is not always feasible and puts the patient at risk. Liquid biopsy, which refers to the tumor-derived material present in body fluids, offers an alternative approach. This less invasive technique gives real-time information on the tumor characteristics. This review addresses different promising liquid biopsy based biomarkers in NSCLC patients that enable the selection of patients who benefit from immunotherapy and the monitoring of patients during this therapy. The challenges and the opportunities of blood-based biomarkers such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes, epigenetic signatures, microRNAs (miRNAs) and the T cell repertoire will be addressed. This review also focuses on the less-studied feces-based and breath-based biomarkers.

Towards Routine Implementation of Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Management: It Is Always Too Early, until Suddenly It Is Too Late

Blood-based liquid biopsies are considered a new and promising diagnostic and monitoring tool for cancer. As liquid biopsies only require a blood draw, they are non-invasive, potentially more rapid and assumed to be a less costly alternative to genomic analysis of tissue biopsies. A multi-disciplinary workshop (n = 98 registrations) was organized to discuss routine implementation of liquid biopsies in cancer management. Real-time polls were used to engage with experts' about the current evidence of clinical utility and the barriers to implementation of liquid biopsies. Clinical, laboratory and health economics presentations were given to illustrate the opportunities and current levels of evidence, followed by three moderated break-out sessions to discuss applications. The workshop concluded that tumor-informed assays using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or PCR-based genotyping assays will most likely provide better clinical utility than tumor-agnostic assays, yet at a higher cost. For routine application, it will be essential to determine clinical utility, to define the minimum quality standards and performance of testing platforms and to ensure their use is integrated into current clinical workflows including how they complement tissue biopsies and imaging. Early health economic models may help identifying the most viable application of liquid biopsies. Alternative funding models for the translation of complex molecular diagnostics, such as liquid biopsies, may also be explored if clinical utility has been demonstrated and when their use is recommended in multi-disciplinary consensus guidelines.