Retrospective Multicentric Study on Non-Optic CNS Tumors in Children and Adolescents with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Phenotype and Genotype of Saudi Pediatric Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Seven-Year Multicenter Experience From Saudi Arabia

Background Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a complex disorder. Genetics and environment might be attributed as the leading cause of NF1, which is characterized by multisystemic involvement. We aim to elaborate on Saudi children's NF1 phenotypes and genotypes. Methods This study was conducted in the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), Saudi Arabia including three tertiary hospitals, using a retrospective cohort method. Electronic charts were reviewed to extract the variables. All Saudi pediatric patients aged less than 18 with NF1 were included. Consecutive sampling was used due to the limited number of patients. Results The study included 160 patients (81 males) with an average age of 8.08 years. Also, 33 (20.6%) patients had cutaneous neurofibroma while 31 (19.4%) patients had plexiform neurofibromas. Iris lisch nodules were seen in 33.75%. Optic pathway glioma was seen in 29 (18%) cases while non-optic pathway glioma was seen in 27 (17%) cases. Skeletal abnormalities were seen in 27 (17%) of cases. A first-degree relative with NF1 was seen in 83 (52%) of cases. Epilepsy was the presenting feature of 27 (17%) cases. Cognitive impairment was found in 15 (9.4%) patients. Genetic mutation was seen in 82/100 cases, the rest were negative. The types of mutations were as follows: nonsense 30 (36.6%); missense 20 (24.4%); splicing site mutation 12 (14.6%); frameshift 10 (12.2%); microdeletion 7 (8.5%); and whole gene deletion 3 (3.75%) patients. No phenotype-genotype correlation was seen. Conclusion In this cohort of Saudi pediatric patients with NF1, optic pathway glioma and other brain tumors were prevalent. The most common mutation is the nonsense mutation.

Evaluating Focal Areas of Signal Intensity (FASI) in Children with Neurofibromatosis Type-1 (NF1) Treated with Selumetinib on Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC)-029B

Background: Understanding the effect of selumetinib on FASI may help elucidate the biology, proliferative potential, and role in neurocognitive changes for these NF1-associated lesions. Methods: Patients with NF1-associated LGG and FASI treated with selumetinib on PBTC-029B were age-matched to untreated patients with NF1-associated FASI at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. Paired bidirectional measurements were compared over time using nonparametric tests. Results: Sixteen age-matched pairs were assessed (age range: 2.8–16.9 years, 60% male). Initial FASI burden was not different between groups (median range 138.7 cm2 [88.4–182.0] for the treated subjects vs. 121.6 cm2 [79.6—181.9] for the untreated subjects; p = 0.98). Over a mean follow-up of 18.9 (±5.9) months, the LGG size consistently decreased with treatment while no consistent change among the treated or untreated FASI size was seen. At the paired time points, the median treated LGG decreased significantly more than the treated FASI (−41.3% (LGG) versus −10.7% (FASI), p = 0.006). However, there was no difference in the median size change in the treated versus untreated FASI (−10.7% (treated FASI) versus −17.9% (untreated FASI), p = 0.08). Among the treated subjects, there was no correlation between the change in LGG and FASI (r = −0.04, p = 0.88). Conclusions: Treatment with selumetinib did not affect the overall FASI size in children with NF1 treated for progressive low-grade glioma.

Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Pediatric Aspects and Review of Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant condition, with a birth incidence of approximately 1:2000-3000, caused by germline pathogenic variants in NF1, a tumor suppressor gene encoding neurofibromin, a negative regulator of the RAS/MAPK pathway. This explains why NF1 is included in the group of RASopathies and shares several clinical features with Noonan syndrome. Here, we describe the main clinical characteristics and complications associated with NF1, particularly those occurring in pediatric age. NF1 has complete penetrance and shows wide inter- and intrafamilial phenotypic variability and age-dependent appearance of manifestations. Clinical presentation and history of NF1 are multisystemic and highly unpredictable, especially in the first years of life when penetrance is still incomplete. In this scenario of extreme phenotypic variability, some genotype-phenotype associations need to be taken into consideration, as they strongly impact on genetic counseling and prognostication of the disease. We provide a synthetic review, based on the most recent literature data, of all known genotype-phenotype correlations from a genetic and clinical perspective. Molecular diagnosis is fundamental for the confirmation of doubtful clinical diagnoses, especially in the light of recently revised diagnostic criteria, and for the early identification of genotypes, albeit few, that correlate with specific phenotypes.

ERN GENTURIS tumour surveillance guidelines for individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem genetic disorder, predisposing development of benign and malignant tumours. Given the oncogenic potential, long-term surveillance is important in patients with NF1. Proposals for NF1 care and its specific manifestations have been developed, but lack integration within routine care. This guideline aims to assimilate available information on NF1 associated tumours (based on evidence and/or expert opinion) to assist healthcare professionals in undertaking tumour surveillance of NF1 individuals.

METHODS

By comprehensive literature review, performed March 18th 2020, guidelines were developed by a NF1 expert group and patient representatives, conversant with clinical care of the wide NF1 disease spectrum. We used a modified Delphi procedure to overcome issues of variability in recommendations for specific (national) health care settings, and to deal with recommendations based on indirect (scarce) evidence.

FINDINGS

We defined proposals for personalised and targeted tumour management in NF1, ensuring appropriate care for those in need, whilst reducing unnecessary intervention. We also incorporated the tumour-related psychosocial and quality of life impact of NF1.

INTERPRETATION

The guideline reflects the current care for NF1 in Europe. They are not meant to be prescriptive and may be adjusted to local available resources at the treating centre, both within and outside EU countries.

FUNDING

This guideline has been supported by the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS). ERN GENTURIS is funded by the European Union. DGE is supported by the Manchester NIHRBiomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20007).

Diencephalic Syndrome Due to Optic Pathway Gliomas in Pediatric Patients: An Italian Multicenter Study

Diencephalic syndrome (DS) is a rare pediatric condition associated with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs). Since they are slow-growing tumors, their diagnosis might be delayed, with consequences on long-term outcomes. We present a multicenter case series of nine children with DS associated with OPG, with the aim of providing relevant details about mortality and long-term sequelae. We retrospectively identified nine children (6 M) with DS (median age 14 months, range 3–26 months). Four patients had NF1-related OPGs. Children with NF1 were significantly older than sporadic cases (median (range) age in months: 21.2 (14–26) versus 10 (3–17); p = 0.015). Seven tumors were histologically confirmed as low-grade astrocytomas. All patients received upfront chemotherapy and nutritional support. Although no patient died, all of them experienced tumor progression within 5.67 years since diagnosis and were treated with several lines of chemotherapy and/or surgery. Long-term sequelae included visual, pituitary and neurological dysfunction. Despite an excellent overall survival, PFS rates are poor in OPGs with DS. These patients invariably present visual, neurological or endocrine sequelae. Therefore, functional outcomes and quality-of-life measures should be considered in prospective trials involving patients with OPGs, aiming to identify “high-risk” patients and to better individualize treatment.

Intracranial Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Not Associated with a Cranial Nerve: Systematic Review and Illustrative Case

OBJECTIVE

Primary intracranial malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) not associated with cranial nerves are rare and aggressive neoplasms. The rarity of presentation has precluded rigorous analysis of diagnosis, risk factors, treatment, and survival. We analyzed every reported case through exhaustive literature review. In addition, we present our own experience managed with resection, radiotherapy, and first use of targeted therapy in a tumor of this type for a BRAF mutation identified during next-generation sequencing.

METHODS

Two databases, PubMed and Embase, and crossed references were queried for intracranial MPNSTs not associated with a cranial nerve. Extracted variables included demographics, risk factors, tumor characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors with survival benefit.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients (including the present case) were included from 743 literature results. There was a male/female ratio of 1.5:1 and mean diagnosis age of 29.7 ± 21.8 years. Seventy-one percent of cases were sporadic and 23% neurofibromatosis type 1 related. Median survival was 29 ± 22.1 months with 1-year survival of 60%. Factors associated on univariate analysis with reduced survival were subtotal resection (P = 0.05), older age (P = 0.023), triton histology (P < 0.001), and early recurrence (≤6 months) (P = 0.018). On multivariate analysis, gross total resection reduced mortality risk (P = 0.011), whereas triton histology (P = 0.017) and infratentorial tumor location (P = 0.037) increased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a systematic review of intracranial MPNSTs not associated with a cranial nerve. These tumors have poor prognosis and benefit from aggressive resection, multimodal treatment, and close follow-up. Next-generation sequencing can show molecular alterations for potential targeted therapy.

Non-Oncological Neuroradiological Manifestations in NF1 and Their Clinical Implications

Simple Summary

Central nervous system involvement (CNS) is a common finding in Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Beside tumor-related manifestations, NF1 is also characterized by a wide spectrum of CNS alterations with variable impacts on functioning and life quality. Here, we propose an overview of non-oncological neuroradiological findings in NF1, with an insight on pathophysiological and embryological clues for a better understanding of the development of these specific alterations.

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), the most frequent phakomatosis and one of the most common inherited tumor predisposition syndromes, is characterized by several manifestations that pervasively involve central and peripheral nervous system structures. The disorder is due to mutations in the NF1 gene, which encodes for the ubiquitous tumor suppressor protein neurofibromin; neurofibromin is highly expressed in neural crest derived tissues, where it plays a crucial role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and structural organization. This review article aims to provide an overview on NF1 non-neoplastic manifestations of neuroradiological interest, involving both the central nervous system and spine. We also briefly review the most recent MRI functional findings in NF1.

Neurofibromatosis in the Era of Precision Medicine: Development of MEK Inhibitors and Recent Successes with Selumetinib

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are at increased risk for benign and malignant neoplasms. Recently, targeted therapy with the MEK inhibitor class has helped address these needs. We highlight recent successes with selumetinib while acknowledging ongoing challenges for NF1 patients and future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

MEK inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for NF1-related conditions, including plexiform neurofibromas and low-grade gliomas, two common causes of NF1-related morbidity. Active investigations for NF1-related neoplasms have benefited from advanced understanding of the genomic and cell signaling alterations in these conditions and development of sound preclinical animal models. Selumetinib has become the first FDA-approved targeted therapy for NF1 following its demonstrated efficacy for inoperable plexiform neurofibroma. Investigations of combination therapy and the development of a representative NF1 swine model hold promise for translating therapies for other NF1-associated pathology.