HPV-Induced Oropharyngeal Cancer and the Role of the E7 Oncoprotein Detection via Brush Test

Biplex quantitative PCR to detect transcriptionally active human papillomavirus 16 from patient saliva

Head and neck cancers, particularly oropharyngeal cancers (OPC), have been increasingly associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infections, specifically HPV16. The current methods for HPV16 detection primarily rely on p16 staining or PCR techniques. However, it is important to note the limitations of conventional PCR, as the presence of viral DNA does not always indicate an ongoing viral infection. Moreover, these tests heavily rely on the availability of tissue samples, which can present challenges in certain situations. In this study, we developed a RT-qPCR biplex approach to detect HPV16 oncogenes E6 and E7 RNA in saliva samples from OPC patients. Salivary supernatant was used as the liquid biopsy source. We successfully obtained RNA from salivary supernatant, preserving its integrity as indicated by the detection of several housekeeping genes. Our biplex approach accurately detected E6 and E7 RNA in HPV16-positive cell lines, tissues, and finally in OPC salivary samples. Importantly, the assay specifically targeted HPV16 and not HPV18. This biplexing technique allowed for reduced sample input without compromising specificity. In summary, our approach demonstrates the potential to detect viable HPV16 in saliva from OPC patients. Since the assay measures HPV16 RNA, it provides insights into the transcriptional activity of the virus. This could guide clinical decision-making and treatment planning for individuals with HPV-related OPC.

Is an oropharyngeal HPV infection more frequently detectable in women with a genital HPV infection?

PURPOSE

If not eliminated by the immune system and persisting over years, oropharyngeal high-risk HPV infection can lead to cancer development in the oropharynx. HPV infection is very commonly found in the genital region and can serve as an HPV reservoir. In this study, we investigate whether women with a genital HPV infection are at a higher risk of harboring an undetected oropharyngeal HPV infection via genital-oropharyngeal transmission.

METHODS

Women presenting for routine gynecological checkups were included in this study. All participants received an HPV brush test from the genital region as well as from the oropharynx. Additionally, probable risk factors for an HPV infection were assessed in a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

142 women were included in this study. The rate of oropharyngeal HPV infection was low with 2/142 (1,4%) women positive for a low-risk HPV genotype. In the genital brush test, 54/142 (38%) women were tested HPV positive of which 41/142 (29%) were positive for a high-risk HPV genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of an oropharyngeal HPV detection in our population was low with 2/142 women harboring a low-risk HPV infection.

Diagnostic Accuracy of HPV Detection in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) techniques in oropharyngeal cancer. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and clinicaltrials.org were systematically searched for studies reporting methods of HPV detection. Primary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity of HPV detection. In this case, 27 studies were included (n = 5488, 41.6% HPV+). In this case, 13 studies evaluated HPV detection in tumour tissue, nine studies examined HPV detection in blood samples and five studies evaluated HPV detection in oral samples. Accuracy of HPV detection in tumour tissue was high for all detection methods, with pooled sensitivity ranging from 81.1% (95% CI 71.9-87.8) to 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.4) and specificity ranging from 81.1% (95% CI 71.9-87.8) to 94.9% (95% CI 79.1-98.9) depending on detection methods. Overall accuracy of HPV detection in blood samples revealed a sensitivity of 81.4% (95% CI 62.9-91.9) and a specificity of 94.8% (95% CI 91.4-96.9). In oral samples pooled sensitivity and specificity were lower (77.0% (95% CI 68.8-83.6) and 74.0% (95% CI 58.0-85.4)). In conclusion, we found an overall high accuracy for HPV detection in tumour tissue regardless of the HPV detection method used. HPV detection in blood samples may provide a promising new way of HPV detection.