Tumors Responsive to Autophagy-Inhibition: Identification and Biomarkers

Tumor biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy

Tumor biomarkers, the substances which are produced by tumors or the body's responses to tumors during tumorigenesis and progression, have been demonstrated to possess critical and encouraging value in screening and early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, recurrence detection, and therapeutic efficacy monitoring of cancers. Over the past decades, continuous progress has been made in exploring and discovering novel, sensitive, specific, and accurate tumor biomarkers, which has significantly promoted personalized medicine and improved the outcomes of cancer patients, especially advances in molecular biology technologies developed for the detection of tumor biomarkers. Herein, we summarize the discovery and development of tumor biomarkers, including the history of tumor biomarkers, the conventional and innovative technologies used for biomarker discovery and detection, the classification of tumor biomarkers based on tissue origins, and the application of tumor biomarkers in clinical cancer management. In particular, we highlight the recent advancements in biomarker-based anticancer-targeted therapies which are emerging as breakthroughs and promising cancer therapeutic strategies. We also discuss limitations and challenges that need to be addressed and provide insights and perspectives to turn challenges into opportunities in this field. Collectively, the discovery and application of multiple tumor biomarkers emphasized in this review may provide guidance on improved precision medicine, broaden horizons in future research directions, and expedite the clinical classification of cancer patients according to their molecular biomarkers rather than organs of origin.

A Phase I Trial to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Autophagy Inhibition Using Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine in Combination With Carboplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Background

Autophagy is a catabolic process that is triggered in cells during periods of metabolic or hypoxic stress, which enables their survival during this challenge. Autophagy may also impart survival advantage to tumors cells undergoing attack from chemotherapy or radiation. Inhibition of early-stage autophagy can rescue cancer cells, while inhibition of late-stage autophagy enhances cell death due to accumulation of damaged organelles. The antiparasitic drugs chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) inhibit late-phase autophagy. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combining CQ or HCQ with carboplatin and gemcitabine (CG) in patients with refractory advanced solid tumors.

Methods

This single institution phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CQ/HCQ, in combination with CG, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were to determine overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A starting dose of CQ or HCQ 50 mg was used in conjunction with standard starting doses of CG and increased in increments of 50 mg in each patient dose cohort. Grade 3 or greater toxicity that is treatment related, and was not self-limited, or not controlled in <7 days was considered dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

Results

Twenty-two patients were enrolled. All patients had at least one prior treatment, and 11 of them had 3 prior regimens. CQ/HCQ 100 mg daily was found to be the MTD in combination with CG with thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia dose limiting. The median overall (OS) was 11 months, and the 1- and 3-year OS were 30% and 7%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 5 months, and the 6-, 12-, and 18-month progression-free survivals were 48%, 21%, and 14%, respectively.

Conclusion

The MTD identified for CQ/HCQ was lower than previously reported with concomitant use of chemotherapeutic regimes likely due to the myelosuppressive nature of CG in previously treated patients.

Role and regulation of autophagy in cancer

Autophagy is an intracellular self-degradative mechanism which responds to cellular conditions like stress or starvation and plays a key role in regulating cell metabolism, energy homeostasis, starvation adaptation, development and cell death. Numerous studies have stipulated the participation of autophagy in cancer, but the role of autophagy either as tumor suppressor or tumor promoter is not clearly understood. However, mechanisms by which autophagy promotes cancer involves a diverse range of modifications of autophagy associated proteins such as ATGs, Beclin-1, mTOR, p53, KRAS etc. and autophagy pathways like mTOR, PI3K, MAPK, EGFR, HIF and NFκB. Furthermore, several researches have highlighted a context-dependent, cell type and stage-dependent regulation of autophagy in cancer. Alongside this, the interaction between tumor cells and their microenvironment including hypoxia has a great potential in modulating autophagy response in favour to substantiate cancer cell metabolism, self-proliferation and metastasis. In this review article, we highlight the mechanism of autophagy and their contribution to cancer cell proliferation and development. In addition, we discuss about tumor microenvironment interaction and their consequence on selective autophagy pathways and the involvement of autophagy in various tumor types and their therapeutic interventions concentrated on exploiting autophagy as a potential target to improve cancer therapy.

Increased ATG5 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis and Promotes EMT in Cervical Carcinoma

Cervical cancer has the second-highest incidence and mortality of female malignancy. The major causes of mortality in patients with cervical cancer are invasion and metastasis. The epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) process plays a major role in the acquisition of metastatic potential and motility. Autophagy-related genes (ARGs) are implicated in the EMT process, and autophagy exerts a dual function in EMT management at different phases of tumor progression. However, the role of specific ARGs during the EMT process has not yet been reported in cervical cancer. Based on the data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC) sequencing database, we performed the prognosis analysis for those ARGs obtained from the Human Autophagy database. ATG5 was identified as the only important harmful marker influencing survival of cervical cancer patients by univariate Cox regression (HR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.0–2.8, p = 0.047), and the 5-years survival rate for the high- and low-ATG5 expression groups was 0.486 (0.375–0.631) and 0.782 (0.708–0.863), respectively. TCGA CESC methylation data showed that eight methylation sites of ATG5 could also be significantly associated with the overall survival (OS) of cervical cancer patients. Single-sample gene-set enrichment and gene functional enrichment results showed that ATG5 was correlated with some cancer-related pathways, such as phagocytosis-related genes, endocytosis-related genes, immune-related genes, EMT score, and some EMT signature-related genes. Next, cell migration and invasion assay and Western blot were applied to detect the function of ATG5 in EMT of cervical cancer. In cervical cancer cells, ATG5 knockdown resulted in attenuation of migration and invasion. The functional study showed that knockdown of ATG5 could reverse EMT process by P-ERK, P-NFκBp65, P-mTOR pathways, and so on. In conclusion, the present study implies that ATG5 was a major contributor to EMT regulation and poor prognosis in cervical cancer.

4-Acetyl-Antroquinonol B Improves the Sensitization of Cetuximab on Both Kras Mutant and Wild Type Colorectal Cancer by Modulating the Expression of Ras/Raf/miR-193a-3p Signaling Axis

The KRAS mutation is one of the leading driver mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC), and it is usually associated with poor prognosis and drug resistance. Therapies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EFGR) are widely used for end-stage CRC. However, patients with KRAS mutant genes cannot benefit from this therapy because of Ras signaling activation by KRAS mutant genes. Our previous study revealed the anti-proliferative effect of 4-acetyl-antroquinonol B (4-AAQB) on CRC cells, but whether the drug is effective in KRAS-mutant CRC remains unknown. We screened CRC cell lines harboring the KRAS mutation, namely G12A, G12C, G12V and G13D, with one wild type cell line as the control; SW1463 and Caco-2 cell lines were used for further experiments. Sulforhodamine B assays, together with the clonogenicity and invasion assay, revealed that KRAS-mutant SW1463 cells were resistant to cetuximab; however, 4-AAQB treatment effectively resensitized CRC cells to cetuximab through the reduction of colony formation, invasion, and tumorsphere generation and of oncogenic KRAS signaling cascade of CRC cells. Thus, inducing cells with 4-AAQB before cetuximab therapy could resensitize KRAS-mutant, but not wild-type, cells to cetuximab. Therefore, we hypothesized that 4-AAQB can inhibit KRAS. In silico analysis of the publicly available GEO (GSE66548) dataset of KRAS-mutated versus KRAS wild-type CRC patients confirmed that miR-193a-3p was significantly downregulated in the former compared with the latter patient population. Overexpression of miR-193a-3p considerably reduced the oncogenicity of both CRC cells. Furthermore, KRAS is a key target of miR-193a-3p. In vivo treatment with the combination of 4-AAQB and cetuximab significantly reduced the tumor burden of a xenograft mice model through the reduction of the expression of oncogenic markers (EGFR) and p-MEK, p-ERK, and c-RAF/p-c-RAF signaling, with the simultaneous induction of miR-193a-3p expression in the plasma. In summary, our findings provide strong evidence regarding the therapeutic effect of 4-AAQB on KRAS-mutant CRC cells. Furthermore, 4-AAQB effectively inhibits Ras singling in CRC cells, through which KRAS-mutant CRC can be resensitized to cetuximab.