1
|
Kummar S, Shen L, Hong DS, McDermott R, Keedy VL, Casanova M, Demetri GD, Dowlati A, Melcón SG, Lassen UN, Leyvraz S, Liu T, Moreno V, Patel J, Patil T, Mallick AB, Sousa N, Tahara M, Ziegler DS, Norenberg R, Arvis P, Brega N, Drilon A, Tan DSW. Larotrectinib efficacy and safety in adult patients with tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion sarcomas. Cancer 2023; 129:3772-3782. [PMID: 37769113 PMCID: PMC11265530 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Larotrectinib, a first-in-class, highly selective tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in adult and pediatric patients with various solid tumors harboring NTRK gene fusions. This subset analysis focuses on the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in an expanded cohort of adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas. METHODS Patients (≥18 years old) with sarcomas harboring NTRK gene fusions were identified from three clinical trials. Patients received larotrectinib 100 mg orally twice daily. Response was investigator-assessed per RECIST v1.1. Data cutoff was July 20, 2021. RESULTS At the data cutoff, 36 adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas had initiated larotrectinib therapy: two (6%) patients had bone sarcomas, four (11%) had gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and 30 (83%) had soft tissue sarcomas. All patients were evaluable for response and demonstrated an objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval, 41-74). Patients responded well to larotrectinib regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were mostly grade 1/2. Grade 3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 15 (42%) patients. There were no grade 4 TEAEs. Two grade 5 TEAEs were reported, neither of which were considered related to larotrectinib. Four (11%) patients permanently discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS Larotrectinib demonstrated robust and durable responses, extended survival benefit, and a favorable safety profile in adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas with longer follow-up. These results continue to demonstrate that testing for NTRK gene fusions should be incorporated into the clinical management of adult patients with various types of sarcomas. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion proteins result from translocations involving the NTRK gene and cause cancer in a range of tumor types. Larotrectinib is an agent that specifically targets TRK fusion proteins and is approved for the treatment of patients with TRK fusion cancer. This study looked at how well larotrectinib worked in adult patients with sarcomas caused by TRK fusion proteins. Over half of patients had a durable response to larotrectinib, with no unexpected side effects. These results show that larotrectinib is safe and effective in adult patients with TRK fusion sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivaani Kummar
- Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - David S Hong
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ray McDermott
- St. Vincent's University Hospital and Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Vicki L Keedy
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Michela Casanova
- Paediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - George D Demetri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Afshin Dowlati
- University Hospitals Ahuja Medical Center, Beachwood, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Ulrik N Lassen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Tianshu Liu
- Zhongshan Hospital-Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Victor Moreno
- START MADRID-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jyoti Patel
- Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Tejas Patil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Atrayee Basu Mallick
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nuno Sousa
- Instituto Portugues de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | - Makoto Tahara
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - David S Ziegler
- Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Australia and School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Alexander Drilon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel S W Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Penel N, Lebellec L, Blay JY. Why will there never be a randomized trial for NTRK-rearranged tumors? Ann Oncol 2023; 34:626-628. [PMID: 37068657 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N Penel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; University of Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - Metrics: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France.
| | - L Lebellec
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - J-Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Michels RE, Arteaga CH, Peters ML, Kapiteijn E, Van Herpen CML, Krol M. Economic Evaluation of a Tumour-Agnostic Therapy: Dutch Economic Value of Larotrectinib in TRK Fusion-Positive Cancers. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:717-729. [PMID: 35843997 PMCID: PMC9385762 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00740-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Larotrectinib is the first tumour-agnostic therapy that has been approved by the European Medicines Agency. Tumour-agnostic therapies are indicated for a multitude of tumour types. The economic models supporting reimbursement submissions of tumour-agnostic therapies are complex because of the multitude of indications per model. OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of larotrectinib compared with standard of care in patients with cancer with tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion-positive tumour types in the Netherlands. METHODS A previously constructed cost-effectiveness model with a partitioned survival approach was adapted to the Dutch setting, simulating costs and effects of treatment in patients with tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion-positive cancer. The cost-effectiveness model conducts a naïve comparison of larotrectinib to a weighted comparator standard-of-care arm. Dutch specific resource use and costs were implemented and inflated to reflect 2019 euros. The analysis includes a lifetime horizon and a societal perspective. RESULTS Larotrectinib versus Dutch standard of care resulted in 5.61 incremental (QALYs) and €232,260 incremental costs, leading to an incremental cost-effectivenes ratio of €41,424/QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis reveals a 88% chance of larotrectinib being cost effective compared with the pooled comparator standard-of-care arm at the applicable €80,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold in the Netherlands. CONCLUSIONS The incremental cost-effectivenes ratio was well below the applicable threshold for diseases with a high burden of disease in the Netherlands (€80,000). At this threshold, larotrectinib was estimated to be a cost-effective treatment for patients with tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion-positive cancer compared with current standard of care in the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée E Michels
- IQVIA, Real World Solutions, Herikerbergweg 314, 1101 CT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Carlos H Arteaga
- HEOR Value Hub, Med-I-Mart BVBA/SPRL, Helshovenstraat 23, 3840, Hoepertingen, Belgium
| | - Michel L Peters
- IQVIA, Real World Solutions, Herikerbergweg 314, 1101 CT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carla M L Van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Krol
- IQVIA, Real World Solutions, Herikerbergweg 314, 1101 CT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goldberg RM, Adams R, Buyse M, Eng C, Grothey A, André T, Sobrero AF, Lichtman SM, Benson AB, Punt CJA, Maughan T, Burzykowski T, Sommeijer D, Saad ED, Shi Q, Coart E, Chibaudel B, Koopman M, Schmoll HJ, Yoshino T, Taieb J, Tebbutt NC, Zalcberg J, Tabernero J, Van Cutsem E, Matheson A, de Gramont A. Clinical Trial Endpoints in Metastatic Cancer: Using Individual Participant Data to Inform Future Trials Methodology. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:819-828. [PMID: 34865086 PMCID: PMC9194619 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Meta-analysis based on individual participant data (IPD) is a powerful methodology for synthesizing evidence by combining information drawn from multiple trials. Hitherto, its principal application has been in questions of clinical management, but an increasingly important use is in clarifying trials methodology, for instance in the selection of endpoints, as discussed in this review. In oncology, the Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Database is a leader in the use of IPD-based meta-analysis in methodological research. The ARCAD database contains IPD from more than 38 000 patients enrolled in 46 studies and continues to collect phase III trial data. Here, we review the principal findings of the ARCAD project in respect of endpoint selection and examine their implications for cancer trials. Analysis of the database has confirmed that progression-free survival (PFS) is no longer a valid surrogate endpoint predictive of overall survival in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. Nonetheless, PFS remains an endpoint of choice for most first-line trials in metastatic colorectal cancer and other solid tumors. Only substantial PFS effects are likely to translate into clinically meaningful benefits, and accordingly, we advocate an oncology research model designed to identify highly effective treatments in carefully defined patient groups. We also review the use of the ARCAD database in assessing clinical response including novel response metrics and prognostic markers. These studies demonstrate the value of IPD as a tool for methodological studies and provide a reference point for the expansion of this approach within clinical cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marc Buyse
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Cathy Eng
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Axel Grothey
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Al B Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Tim Maughan
- Gray Institute of Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Tomasz Burzykowski
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Dirkje Sommeijer
- University of Amsterdam Academic Medical Centre and Flevohospital, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - Everardo D Saad
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Dendrix Research, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Elisabeth Coart
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Julien Taieb
- Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - John Zalcberg
- Monash University, School of Public Health, Australia
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Aimery de Gramont
- Hôpital Franco-Britannique, Paris, France
- Fondation ARCAD , Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feng Z, Gu Y, Yuan M, Xiao R, Fei Z. Clinical Trials of Liposomes in Children’s Anticancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Int J Nanomedicine 2022; 17:1843-1850. [PMID: 35502234 PMCID: PMC9056094 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s359666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Clinical trials have become essential for driving the development of medicine. However, little is known about the current status of clinical trials on liposomes in children’s anticancer therapy (LCAT). This study aimed to synthesize current finding from clinical trials of LCAT in ClinicalTrials.gov. Methods A cross-sectional descriptive study of clinical trials on LCAT was conducted, using studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov through December 30, 2021. Results A total of 74 eligible trials were identified, accounting for 4.8% (74/1552) of all trials on liposomes for cancer therapy. Among these trials, 70 (94.6%) were interventional trials, and the remaining 4 (5.4%) were observational trials. Of the 70 interventional trials, 63 (90.0%) were for treatment, 48.6% were involving unlabeled allocations, 30.0% were randomized, 52.9% were single group assignment, 71.4% were without masking, 28.6% were Phase 3 trials, 30.0% were Phase 1 trials, and 24.3% were Phase 2 trials. Furthermore, 17 liposomal drugs for 123 types of cancer were investigated in the interventional trials, and these were mainly focused on organic chemicals (43/70, 61.4%). Of these cancers, the highest proportion was leukemia (15.4%), followed by lymphoma (9.8%) and ovarian cancer (8.9%). Conclusion High quality, adequately powered, masked, appropriately sized, and randomized clinical trials represent the critical priorities for conducting a high-quality clinical trial. However, most of these trials for LCAT were non-randomized, single group assignment, and non-blinded interventional trials of small scale, with various eligibility criteria and outcome measures. Our analysis highlights the need for improvement in the completeness of study designs curated on clinicalTrials.gov. We urge for decision-makers to avoid adopting entrenched positions about the study design of cancer clinical trials to avoid this problem. As such, tackling the problematic challenges related to cancer and designing efficient trials for cancer requires developing and applying new approaches and multiple strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaosong Feng
- Pharmacy Department, Jianhu People’s Hospital, Jianhu, Jiangsu Province, 224700, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yuyang Gu
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Mengping Yuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Renzhong Xiao
- R&D Center, Hunan Royal Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Changsha, Hunan Province, 410000, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Renzhong Xiao, R&D Center, Hunan Royal Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Changsha City, Hunan Province, 410000, People’s Republic of China, Email
| | - Zhenghua Fei
- Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325000, People’s Republic of China
- Zhenghua Fei, Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325000, People’s Republic of China, Email
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu F, Wei Y, Zhang H, Jiang J, Zhang P, Chu Q. NTRK Fusion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Diagnosis, Therapy, and TRK Inhibitor Resistance. Front Oncol 2022; 12:864666. [PMID: 35372074 PMCID: PMC8968138 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.864666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion has been identified as an oncogenic driver of various solid tumors, and it is rare in non-smalll cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a frequency of approximately less than 1%. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is of priority for detecting NTRK fusions, especially RNA-based NGS. Currently, the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have shown promising efficacy and well tolerance in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors, regardless of tumor histology. The first-generation TRK inhibitors (larotrectinib and entrectinib) are recommended as the first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with positive NTRK fusion. However, TRK inhibitor resistance can eventually occur due to on-target or off-target mechanisms. Further studies are under investigation to overcome resistance and improve survival. Interestingly, NTRK fusion might be the mechanism of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Regarding immunotherapy, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC patients harboring NTRK fusion has yet to be well described. In this review, we elucidate the function of NTRK genes, summarize the diagnostic techniques for NTRK fusions, and present clinical data for TRK inhibitors; we also discuss potential mechanisms of resistance to TRK inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangfang Liu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuxuan Wei
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- The Second Clinical College of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jizong Jiang
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Jizong Jiang,
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qian Chu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sullivan WG, Hatswell AJ. Letter re: 'Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications'. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100282. [PMID: 34924145 PMCID: PMC8710459 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - A J Hatswell
- Delta Hat Limited, 1 Lamorna Court 43 Wollaton Road Beeston, Nottingham, UK; Department of Statistical Science, University College London Standard Institution, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pestana RC, Beal JR, Parkes A, Hamerschlak N, Subbiah V. Impact of tissue-agnostic approvals for patients with sarcoma. Trends Cancer 2021; 8:135-144. [PMID: 34887213 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Tissue-agnostic drug development is a major step forward in offering treatment options for rare tumors. Sarcomas are heterogeneous rare malignancies with more than 100 subtypes. Recent failure of Phase III trials, nonbiomarker-driven clinical trials, and rarity hamper developmental therapeutics in sarcomas. Since a 'one-size-fits-all' approach continues to be the standard of care, tissue-agnostic approvals assume significance in sarcomas. In this review, we focus on the clinical evidence of recent drug approvals for neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) phenotype, and tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) status in the context of sarcomas, and the future landscape of tissue-agnostic targets, such as rearranged during transfection (RET), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and neuregulin-1 (NRG1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Carmagnani Pestana
- Centro de Oncologia e Hematologia Família Dayan-Daycoval, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Juliana Rodrigues Beal
- Centro de Oncologia e Hematologia Família Dayan-Daycoval, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Amanda Parkes
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nelson Hamerschlak
- Centro de Oncologia e Hematologia Família Dayan-Daycoval, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (A Phase I Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Network, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krebs MG, Bennett I. Response to comment on "Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications". ESMO Open 2021; 6:100307. [PMID: 34794056 PMCID: PMC8605280 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M G Krebs
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - I Bennett
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Belgian expert consensus for tumor-agnostic treatment of NTRK gene fusion-driven solid tumors with larotrectinib. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103564. [PMID: 34861380 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Fusions of NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase) genes with 5' partner genes can result in the expression of chimeric proteins that drive oncogenesis through ligand-independent kinase activation. Despite variable frequencies of NTRK fusions in different tumor types, the fact that they are common to a wide range of cancers raises the possibility of developing tumor-agnostic treatments specifically targeting NTRK fusion products, irrespective of tumor type. The first-generation Trk (tropomyosin receptor kinase) inhibitor, larotrectinib, was the first tumor-agnostic treatment of NTRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children, to be approved in the European Union. This consensus, developed by a Belgian multidisciplinary expert panel, aims to highlight the unmet medical need associated to NTRK fusion-driven cancer treatment and, based on current knowledge of NTRK fusions and larotrectinib treatment outcome and safety, provide comprehensive guidance to oncologists regarding NTRK fusion-driven cancer diagnostics and the best use of larotrectinib in real-world clinical settings. Larotrectinib; NTRK gene fusion; Trk inhibitor; Tumor-agnostic; Expert opinion; Oncogene proteins; Protein kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pierobon M, Robert NJ, Northfelt DW, Jahanzeb M, Wong S, Hodge KA, Baldelli E, Aldrich J, Craig DW, Liotta LA, Avramovic S, Wojtusiak J, Alemi F, Wulfkuhle JD, Bellos A, Gallagher RI, Arguello D, Conrad A, Kemkes A, Loesch DM, Vocila L, Dunetz B, Carpten JD, Petricoin EF, Anthony SP. Multi-omic molecular profiling guide's efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial. Mol Oncol 2021; 16:104-115. [PMID: 34437759 PMCID: PMC8732340 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi‐omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA‐Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP‐selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow‐up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11–22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan‐based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan‐based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mohammad Jahanzeb
- A Division of 21st Century Oncology, Florida Precision Oncology, Raton, FL, USA
| | - Shukmei Wong
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | - David W Craig
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Sanja Avramovic
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Janusz Wojtusiak
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Farrokh Alemi
- Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Linda Vocila
- Translational Drug Development (TD2), Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - John D Carpten
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kojadinovic A, Laderian B, Mundi PS. Targeting TRK: A fast-tracked application of precision oncology and future directions. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 165:103451. [PMID: 34389458 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The NTRK genes encode the tropomyosin-related receptor tyrosine kinases TrkA, TrkB and TrkC. TRK receptors regulate the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of many neuronal and non-neuronal glial cells during embryogenesis, thus playing a critical role in synaptic plasticity and the development of nociceptive pathways. Recurrent genomic alterations in NTRK genes, typically fusions involving the 3' region encoding the kinase domain juxtaposed to 5' sequences from numerous partner genes, occur at a low frequency in a wide diversity of adult and pediatric cancers. The contributions of the resulting constitutively activated kinase to oncogenesis and cancer progression are being elucidated. Larotrectinib and entrectinib are potent first-generation TRK inhibitors with IC50 values in the nanomolar range across cancer cell lines harboring NTRK fusions. Larotrectinib is highly selective for TRK receptors, whereas entrectinib also potently inhibits ROS1 and ALK. Clinical trials of both drugs demonstrated significant and durable responses in patients with tumors harboring NTRK alterations, leading to first of its kind cancer agnostic FDA approvals in the United States for drugs targeting a genomic alteration. Unfortunately, acquired resistance inevitably develops. The second-generation TRK inhibitors selitrectinib and repotrectinib are designed to overcome known mechanisms of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsenije Kojadinovic
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States; James J. Peters VA Medical Center, United States
| | | | - Prabhjot S Mundi
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center, United States; Columbia University Irving Medical Center, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Krebs MG, Blay JY, Le Tourneau C, Hong D, Veronese L, Antoniou M, Bennett I. Intrapatient comparisons of efficacy in a single-arm trial of entrectinib in tumour-agnostic indications. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100072. [PMID: 33676294 PMCID: PMC8103537 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Entrectinib is a tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive solid tumours based on single-arm trials. Traditional randomised clinical trials in rare cancers are not feasible; we conducted an intrapatient analysis to evaluate the clinical benefit of entrectinib versus prior standard-of-care systemic therapies. Methods Patients with locally advanced/metastatic NTRK fusion-positive tumours enrolled in the global phase II, single-arm STARTRK-2 trial were grouped according to prior systemic therapy and response. The key analysis used growth modulation index [GMI; ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) on entrectinib to time to discontinuation (TTD) on the most recent prior therapy]; ratio ≥1.3 indicated clinically meaningful efficacy. Additional analyses investigated TTD and objective response rate (ORR) for entrectinib and prior therapies. Results Seventy-one patients were included; 51 received prior systemic therapy. In 38 patients who progressed on prior therapy, ORR was 60.5% (23/38) with entrectinib and 15.8% (6/38) with the most recent prior therapy. Median PFS [11.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.7–not estimable] for entrectinib exceeded median TTD (2.9 months; 95% CI 2.0-4.9) for most recent prior therapy. From the intrapatient analysis of GMI, 65.8% had a ratio ≥1.3 and median GMI was 2.53. Consistent results were observed at more stringent GMI thresholds; 60.5% of patients had GMI ≥1.5 or ≥1.8 and 57.9% had GMI ≥2.0. Conclusions ORR was high and PFS was longer on entrectinib versus TTD on prior therapy. Furthermore, 65.8% of patients experienced clinically meaningful benefit based on GMI. This intrapatient analysis demonstrates comparative effectiveness of entrectinib in a rare, heterogeneous adult population. Randomised trials are unfeasible for molecular targeted agents in rare indications because of low patient numbers. Intrapatient comparison with prior therapies can be used to evaluate relative treatment efficacy in rare tumours. Entrectinib is a potent tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor with proven efficacy in neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive tumours from the global STARTRK-2 trial. Median progression-free survival on entrectinib was longer than time to discontinuation on prior therapy (11.2 months versus 2.9 months). About 61% of patients with prior therapy progression responded to entrectinib; 66% had growth modulation index ≥1.3 (clinically meaningful threshold).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M G Krebs
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - J-Y Blay
- Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - C Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris-Saclay University, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - D Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - L Veronese
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Antoniou
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - I Bennett
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|