1
|
Kim J, Lee S, Kim D, Kim HJ, Oh KT, Kim SJ, Choi YD, Giesel FL, Kopka K, Hoepping A, Lee M, Yun M. Combination of [ 18F]FDG and [ 18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT predicts tumour aggressiveness at staging and biochemical failure postoperatively in patients with prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:1763-1772. [PMID: 38200396 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06585-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has limitations in prostate cancer (PCa) detection owing to low glycolysis in the primary tumour. Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has been useful for biochemical failure detection and radioligand therapy (RLT) guidance. However, few studies have evaluated its use in primary prostate tumours using PSMA and [18F]FDG PET/CT. This study aimed to evaluate [18F]PSMA-1007 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for primary tumour detection and understand the association of metabolic heterogeneity with clinicopathological characteristics at staging and postoperatively. METHOD This prospective study included 42 index tumours (27 acinar and 15 ductal-dominant) in 42 patients who underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 and [18F]FDG PET/CT and subsequent radical prostatectomy. All patients were followed for a median of 26 mo, and serum prostate-specific antigen levels were measured every 3 mo to evaluate biochemical failure. One-way analysis of variance, Tukey's multiple comparison test, and Fisher's exact test were performed. RESULTS All 42 index tumours were detected on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT, whereas only 15 were detected on [18F]FDG PET/CT (62.3% vs. 37.7%, p < 0.0001). A high SUVmax for [18F]PSMA-1007 was observed in tumours with high Gleason scores (GS 6-7 vs. GS 8-10; 12.1 vs. 20.1, p < 0.05). Tumours with [18F]FDG uptake were mostly ductal dominant (acinar-dominant 4/27; ductal-dominant; 11/15, p < 0.001), with lower [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake than tumours without [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax 16.58 vs. 11.19, p < 0.001). There were 16.6% (7/42) of patients with pStage IV in whom the primary tumours were [18F]FDG positive. Biochemical failure was observed in 14.8% (4/27) of patients with [18F]FDG negative tumours but in 53.3% (8/15) of patients with [18F]FDG positive tumours (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT was superior to [18F]FDG PET/CT in detecting primary PCa. In contrast, tumours with [18F]FDG uptake are associated with larger size, a ductal-dominant type, and likely to undergo metastasis at staging and biochemical failure postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jisu Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Seunghwan Lee
- Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dongwoo Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, South Korea
| | - Hyun Jeong Kim
- Department of Nuclear medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea
| | - Kyeong Taek Oh
- Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sun Jung Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Young Deuk Choi
- Department of Urology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Frederik L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), 01328, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alexander Hoepping
- ABX Advanced Biochemical Compounds GmbH, Heinrich-Glaeser-Strasse 10-14, 01454, Radeberg, Germany
| | - Misu Lee
- Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, South Korea.
- Institute for New Drug Development, College of Life Science and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, 22012, South Korea.
| | - Mijin Yun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Metz R, Rauscher A, Vaugier L, Supiot S, Drouet F, Campion L, Rousseau C. Comparison of Hormone-Sensitive Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Patients Based on Routine Use of Choline and/or PSMA PET/CT to Guide Metastasis-Directed Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061898. [PMID: 36980784 PMCID: PMC10047404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In hormone-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC), the literature showed [68Ga]Ga-PSMA (PSMA) and [18F]F-choline (FCH) PET/CT can successfully guide metastasis-directed therapies (MDT). This observational retrospective study aimed to explore, in routine use, the impact of FCH or PSMA PET/CT in guiding MDT for hormone-sensitive oligometastatic PC at different recurrences. METHODS In 2017-2020, patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy but, in biochemical recurrence (with PSA ≤ 2 ng/mL), diagnosed as oligometastatic based on FCH or PSMA PET/CT, were identified. MDT was stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), elective nodal or prostate bed radiotherapy ± boost and ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BR-FS), defined as a PSA increase ≥ 0.2 ng/mL above the nadir and increasing over two successive samples and the secondaries were ADT-free survival (ADT-FS). RESULTS 123 patients (70 PSMA and 53 FCH) were included. The median follow-up was 42.2 months. The median BR-FS was 24.7 months in the PSMA group versus 13.0 months in the FCH group (p = 0.008). Similarly, ADT-FS (p = 0.001) was longer in patients in the PSMA group. In multivariate analysis, a short PSA doubling time before imaging (p = 0.005) and MDT with SBRT (p = 0.001) were poor prognostic factors for BR-FS. CONCLUSIONS Routine use of FCH or PSMA PET/CT in hormone-sensitive PC showed an advantage for using PSMA PET/CT to guide MDT in terms of BR-FS and ADT-FS in patients with low PSA value. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Metz
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
| | - Aurore Rauscher
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
| | - Loïg Vaugier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
- Laboratoire US2B, Unité en Sciences Biologiques et Biotechnologies, UMR CNRS 6286, UFR SCIENCES ET TECHNIQUES, 2, Rue de la Houssinière, F-44322 Nantes, France
| | - Franck Drouet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clinique Mutualiste de l'Estuaire, F-44600 Saint-Nazaire, France
| | - Loic Campion
- Biostatistics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
- Nantes Université, Univ Angers, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Caroline Rousseau
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Boulevard J. Monod, F-44800 St-Herblain, France
- Nantes Université, Univ Angers, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, F-44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farneti A, Bottero M, Faiella A, Giannarelli D, Bertini L, Landoni V, Vici P, D’Urso P, Sanguineti G. The Prognostic Value of DCE-MRI Findings before Salvage Radiotherapy after Radical Prostatectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041246. [PMID: 36831588 PMCID: PMC9954112 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the predictive role of dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) findings before salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS This retrospective study selected patients with biochemical failure (BF) after RP restaged with DCE-MRI. Patients underwent sRT in 30 fractions delivering 66-69 Gy and 73.5 Gy to the prostatic fossa and to the local failure as per DCE-MRI, respectively. Pelvic nodes were treated to 54 Gy in selected patients. The endpoint was BF after sRT. RESULTS In total, 236 patients were analyzed and 146 (61.9%) had presumed local failure at DCE-MRI: 54.8%, 23.8% and 21.4% were found at the vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA), the bladder neck and the retro-vesical space, respectively. The presence of a local failure at DCE-MRI halved the risk of BF; VUA-only location and lesion volume were independently correlated with survival without evidence of biochemical failure (bNED) at multivariable analysis. For patients with VUA-only disease up to 0.4 cc, the 4-year-bNED was 94.6% (95%CI: 80.2-98.6%) as opposed to 80.9% (95%CI: 71.6-87.4%) and 73.7% (95%CI: 63.1-81.8%) for other lesions and no macrodisease, respectively. CONCLUSIONS DCE-MRI at restaging for BF after RP provides predictive and therapeutic information. Patients with small lesions at the VUA have an excellent prognosis after sRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Farneti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Bottero
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Adriana Faiella
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Biostatistics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Bertini
- Radiology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Landoni
- Physics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Patrizia Vici
- Phase IV Studies, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Pasqualina D’Urso
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spohn SKB, Farolfi A, Schandeler S, Vogel MME, Ruf J, Mix M, Kirste S, Ceci F, Fanti S, Lanzafame H, Serani F, Gratzke C, Sigle A, Combs SE, Bernhardt D, Gschwend JE, Buchner JA, Trapp C, Belka C, Bartenstein P, Unterrainer L, Unterrainer M, Eiber M, Nekolla SG, Schiller K, Grosu AL, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Zamboglou C, Peeken JC. The maximum standardized uptake value in patients with recurrent or persistent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and PSMA-PET-guided salvage radiotherapy-a multicenter retrospective analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 50:218-227. [PMID: 35984452 PMCID: PMC9668780 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05931-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the association of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in positron-emission tomography targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET) prior to salvage radiotherapy (sRT) on biochemical recurrence free survival (BRFS) in a large multicenter cohort. Methods Patients who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA11-PET prior to sRT were enrolled in four high-volume centers in this retrospective multicenter study. Only patients with PET-positive local recurrence (LR) and/or nodal recurrence (NR) within the pelvis were included. Patients were treated with intensity-modulated-sRT to the prostatic fossa and elective lymphatics in case of nodal disease. Dose escalation was delivered to PET-positive LR and NR. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered at the discretion of the treating physician. LR and NR were manually delineated and SUVmax was extracted for LR and NR. Cox-regression was performed to analyze the impact of clinical parameters and the SUVmax-derived values on BRFS. Results Two hundred thirty-five patients with a median follow-up (FU) of 24 months were included in the final cohort. Two-year and 4-year BRFS for all patients were 68% and 56%. The presence of LR was associated with favorable BRFS (p = 0.016). Presence of NR was associated with unfavorable BRFS (p = 0.007). While there was a trend for SUVmax values ≥ median (p = 0.071), SUVmax values ≥ 75% quartile in LR were significantly associated with unfavorable BRFS (p = 0.022, HR: 2.1, 95%CI 1.1–4.6). SUVmax value in NR was not significantly associated with BRFS. SUVmax in LR stayed significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.030). Sensitivity analysis with patients for who had a FU of > 12 months (n = 197) confirmed these results. Conclusion The non-invasive biomarker SUVmax can prognosticate outcome in patients undergoing sRT and recurrence confined to the prostatic fossa in PSMA-PET. Its addition might contribute to improve risk stratification of patients with recurrent PCa and to guide personalized treatment decisions in terms of treatment intensification or de-intensification. This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology—Genitourinary. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05931-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. .,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sarah Schandeler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology Scientific IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juergen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Josef A Buchner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan G Nekolla
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Oncology Center, European University of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zamboglou C, Strouthos I, Sahlmann J, Farolfi A, Serani F, Medici F, Cavallini L, Morganti AG, Trapp C, Koerber SA, Peeken JC, Vogel MME, Schiller K, Combs SE, Eiber M, Vrachimis A, Ferentinos K, Spohn SKB, Kirste S, Gratzke C, Ruf J, Grosu AL, Ceci F, Fendler WP, Miksch J, Kroeze S, Guckenberger M, Lanzafame H, Fanti S, Hruby G, Wiegel T, Emmett L, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Henkenberens C. Metastasis-free survival and patterns of distant metastatic disease after PSMA-PET-guided salvage radiotherapy in recurrent or persistent prostate cancer after prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:1015-1024. [PMID: 35659629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is increasingly used to guide salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical recurrence/persistence after prostatectomy. This work examines (i) metastasis-free survival (MFS) following PSMA-PET guided sRT and (ii) the metastatic patterns on PSMA-PET images after sRT. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter (9 centers, 5 countries) study included patients referred for PSMA-PET due to recurrent/persistent disease after prostatectomy. Patients with distant metastases (DM) on PSMA-PET prior to sRT were excluded. Cox-regression was performed to assess the impact of clinical parameters on MFS. The distribution of PSMA-PET detected DM following sRT and their respective risk factors were analysed. RESULTS All (n=815) patients received intensity-modulated RT to the prostatic fossa. In case of PET-positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLN-PET, n=275, 34%), pelvic lymphatics had been irradiated. Androgen deprivation therapy had been given in 251 (31%) patients. The median follow-up after sRT was 36 months. The 2-/4-year MFS following sRT were 93%/81%. In multivariate analysis the presence of PLN-PET was a strong predictor for MFS (HR=2.39, p<0.001). Following sRT, DM were detected by PSMA-PET in 128/198 (65%) patients and two metastatic patterns were observed: 43% had DM in sub diaphragmatic paraaortic LNs (abdominal-lymphatic) whereas 45% in bones, 9% in supra diaphragmatic LNs and 6% in visceral organs (distant). Two distinct signatures with risk factors for each pattern were identified. CONCLUSION MFS in our study is lower compared to previous studies, obviously due to the higher detection rate of DM in PSMA-PET after sRT. Thus, it remains unclear whether MFS is a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in PSMA PET-staged patients in the post sRT setting. PLN-PET may be proposed as a new surrogate parameter predictive of MFS. Analysis of recurrence patterns in PET after sRT revealed risk factor signatures for two metastatic patterns (abdominal-lymphatic and distant), which may allow individualized sRT concepts in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus.
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Joerg Sahlmann
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Medici
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Letizia Cavallini
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum, München, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus; C.A.R.I.C. Cancer Research & Innovation Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, University Hospital of the European University, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gratzke
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jonathan Miksch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stephanie Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital - University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia
| | | | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jani AB, Schreibmann E, Goyal S, Halkar R, Hershatter B, Rossi PJ, Shelton JW, Patel PR, Xu KM, Goodman M, Master VA, Joshi SS, Kucuk O, Carthon BC, Bilen MA, Abiodun-Ojo OA, Akintayo AA, Dhere VR, Schuster DM. 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging alone to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer (EMPIRE-1): a single centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2021; 397:1895-1904. [PMID: 33971152 PMCID: PMC8279109 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00581-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular imaging is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions and planning in prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the role of 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT in improving cancer control compared with conventional imaging (bone scan and either CT or MRI) alone for salvage postprostatectomy radiotherapy. METHODS In EMPIRE-1, a single-centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial, patients with prostate cancer with detectable PSA after prostatectomy and negative conventional imaging (no extrapelvic or bone findings) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to radiotherapy directed by conventional imaging alone or to conventional imaging plus 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT. Computer-generated randomisation was stratified by PSA concentration, adverse pathology indicators, and androgen deprivation therapy intent. In the 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT group, radiotherapy decisions were rigidly determined by PET findings, which were also used for target delineation. The primary endpoint was 3 year event-free survival, with events defined as biochemical or clinical recurrence or progression, or initiation of systemic therapy, using univariate and multivariable analyses in patients who received radiotherapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01666808 and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS From Sept 18, 2012, to March 4, 2019, 165 patients were randomly assigned, with median follow-up of 3·52 years (95% CI 2·98-3·95). PET findings resulted in four patients in the 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT group having radiotherapy aborted; these patients were excluded from survival analyses. Median survival was not reached (95% CI 35·2-not reached; 33% of 81 patients had events) in the conventional imaging group compared with not reached (95% CI not reached-not reached; 20% of 76 patients) in the 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT group, and 3 year event-free survival was 63·0% (95% CI 49·2-74·0) in the conventional imaging group versus 75·5% (95% CI 62·5-84·6) for 18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT (difference 12·5; 95% CI 4·3-20·8; p=0·0028). In adjusted analyses, study group (hazard ratio 2·04 [95% CI 1·06-3·93], p=0·0327) was significantly associated with event-free survival. Toxicity was similar in both study groups, with the most common adverse events being late urinary frequency or urgency (37 [46%] of 81 patients in the conventional imaging group and 31 [41%] of 76 in the PET group), and acute diarrhoea (11 [14%] in the conventional imaging group and 16 [21%] in the PET group). INTERPRETATION Inclusion of 18F-fluciclovine-PET into postprostatectomy radiotherapy decision making and planning significantly improved survival free from biochemical recurrence or persistence. Integration of novel PET radiotracers into radiotherapy decisions and planning for prostate cancer patients warrants further study. FUNDING National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashesh B Jani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Eduard Schreibmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Subir Goyal
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Raghuveer Halkar
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta GA, USA
| | - Bruce Hershatter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Peter J Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joseph W Shelton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Pretesh R Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karen M Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mark Goodman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta GA, USA
| | - Viraj A Master
- Department of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta GA, USA
| | | | - Omer Kucuk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bradley C Carthon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Akinyemi A Akintayo
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta GA, USA
| | - Vishal R Dhere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David M Schuster
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Adaptive sequential plan-on-plan optimization during prostate-specific antigen response guided radiotherapy of recurrent prostate cancer. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 18:5-10. [PMID: 34258401 PMCID: PMC8254191 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Treatment adaptation based on tumour biomarker response during radiotherapy of prostate cancer, could be used for both escalation and de-escalation of radiation doses and volumes. To execute an adaptation involving extension of treatment volumes during radiation can however be restricted by the doses already delivered. The aim of this work was to develop a treatment planning method that addresses this challenge. Material and methods A volumetric-modulated-arc-therapy (VMAT) planning method with sequential plan-on-plan optimization was developed for a prospective phase II trial including 100 patients on salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer recurrence. A treatment adaptation was performed after five weeks of SRT based on prostate-specific antigen response during this phase of the treatment. This involved extension of treatment volumes for non-responders (n = 64) to include pelvic lymph nodes and boost to 68Gallium-Prostate-Specific-Membrane-Antigen-Positron-Emission-Tomography positive lesions. This method was evolved by introducing an EQD2 (equivalent dose in 2.0 Gy fractions) correction of the base plan for improved dose coverage. Results All dose-volume criteria for target coverage were met for the non-responders when based on physical dose. An EQD2 correction of the base plan for non-responders, implemented for the final 29 patients, led to a statistically significant improvement in dose coverage as compared to the 35 patients treated without EQD2 correction. Conclusions This is to our knowledge the only study presented on biomarker-guided sequential VMAT radiotherapy using a plan-on-plan technique in the pelvis. By using a biologically adapted technique an improved target coverage was achieved without compromising doses to organs at risk.
Collapse
|