An Improved, Assay Platform Agnostic, Absolute Single Sample Breast Cancer Subtype Classifier

Building flexible and robust analysis frameworks for molecular subtyping of cancers

Molecular subtyping is essential to infer tumor aggressiveness and predict prognosis. In practice, tumor profiling requires in-depth knowledge of bioinformatics tools involved in the processing and analysis of the generated data. Additionally, data incompatibility (e.g., microarray versus RNA sequencing data) and technical and uncharacterized biological variance between training and test data can pose challenges in classifying individual samples. In this article, we provide a roadmap for implementing bioinformatics frameworks for molecular profiling of human cancers in a clinical diagnostic setting. We describe a framework for integrating several methods for quality control, normalization, batch correction, classification and reporting, and develop a use case of the framework in breast cancer.

A Simple Method for Robust and Accurate Intrinsic Subtyping of Breast Cancer

Motivation

The PAM50 signature/method is widely used for intrinsic subtyping of breast cancer samples. However, depending on the number and composition of the samples included in a cohort, the method may assign different subtypes to the same sample. This lack of robustness is mainly due to the fact that PAM50 subtracts a reference profile, which is computed using all samples in the cohort, from each sample before classification. In this paper we propose modifications to PAM50 to develop a simple and robust single-sample classifier, called MPAM50, for intrinsic subtyping of breast cancer. Like PAM50, the modified method uses a nearest centroid approach for classification, but the centroids are computed differently, and the distances to the centroids are determined using an alternative method. Additionally, MPAM50 uses unnormalized expression values for classification and does not subtract a reference profile from the samples. In other words, MPAM50 classifies each sample independently, and so avoids the previously mentioned robustness issue.

Results

A training set was employed to find the new MPAM50 centroids. MPAM50 was then tested on 19 independent datasets (obtained using various expression profiling technologies) containing 9637 samples. Overall good agreement was observed between the PAM50- and MPAM50-assigned subtypes with a median accuracy of 0.792, which (we show) is comparable with the median concordance between various implementations of PAM50. Additionally, MPAM50- and PAM50-assigned intrinsic subtypes were found to agree comparably with the reported clinical subtypes. Also, survival analyses indicated that MPAM50 preserves the prognostic value of the intrinsic subtypes. These observations demonstrate that MPAM50 can replace PAM50 without loss of performance. On the other hand, MPAM50 was compared with 2 previously published single-sample classifiers, and with 3 alternative modified PAM50 approaches. The results indicated a superior performance by MPAM50.

Conclusions

MPAM50 is a robust, simple, and accurate single-sample classifier of intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer.

Value of genomics- and radiomics-based machine learning models in the identification of breast cancer molecular subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In the era of precision therapy, early classification of breast cancer (BRCA) molecular subtypes has clinical significance for disease management and prognosis. We explored the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models for early classification of BRCA molecular subtypes through a systematic review of the literature currently available.

Methods

We retrieved relevant studies published in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science until 15 April 2022. A prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST) was applied for the assessment of risk of bias of a genomics-based ML model, and the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was simultaneously used to evaluate the quality of this radiomics-based ML model. A random effects model was adopted to analyze the predictive accuracy of genomics-based ML and radiomics-based ML for Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The PROSPERO of our study was prospectively registered (CRD42022333611).

Results

Of the 38 studies were selected for analysis, 14 ML models were based on gene-transcriptomic, with only 4 external validations; and 43 ML models were based on radiomics, with only 14 external validations. Meta-analysis results showed that c-statistic values of the ML based on radiomics for the identification of BRCA molecular subtypes Luminal A, Luminal B, Basal-like or TNBC, and HER2 were 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.96], 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86), respectively. The c-statistic values of ML based on the gene-transcriptomic analysis cohort for the identification of the previously described BRCA molecular subtypes were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00), and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.98) respectively. Additionally, the sensitivity of the ML model based on radiomics for each molecular subtype ranged from 0.79 to 0.85, while the sensitivity of the ML model based on gene-transcriptomic was between 0.92 and 0.99.

Conclusions

Both radiomics and gene transcriptomics produced ideal effects on BRCA molecular subtype prediction. Compared with radiomics, gene transcriptomics yielded better prediction results, but radiomics was simpler and more convenient from a clinical point of view.

Breast Cancer Subtypes Classification with Hybrid Machine Learning Model

BACKGROUND

 Breast cancer is the most prevailing heterogeneous disease among females characterized with distinct molecular subtypes and varied clinicopathological features. With the emergence of various artificial intelligence techniques especially machine learning, the breast cancer research has attained new heights in cancer detection and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

 Recent development in computer driven diagnostic system has enabled the clinicians to improve the accuracy in detecting various types of breast tumors. Our study is to develop a computer driven diagnostic system which will enable the clinicians to improve the accuracy in detecting various types of breast tumors.

METHODS

 In this article, we proposed a breast cancer classification model based on the hybridization of machine learning approaches for classifying triple-negative breast cancer and non-triple negative breast cancer patients with clinicopathological features collected from multiple tertiary care hospitals/centers.

RESULTS

 The results of genetic algorithm and support vector machine (GA-SVM) hybrid model was compared with classics feature selection SVM hybrid models like support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), LASSO-SVM, Grid-SVM, and linear SVM. The classification results obtained from GA-SVM hybrid model outperformed the other compared models when applied on two distinct hospital-based datasets of patients investigated with breast cancer in North West of African subcontinent. To validate the predictive model accuracy, 10-fold cross-validation method was applied on all models with the same multicentered datasets. The model performance was evaluated with well-known metrics like mean squared error, logarithmic loss, F1-score, area under the ROC curve, and the precision-recall curve.

CONCLUSION

 The hybrid machine learning model can be employed for breast cancer subtypes classification that could help the medical practitioners in better treatment planning and disease outcome.

Tumor microenvironment-aware, single-transcriptome prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer using meta-analysis

Detecting microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancers (CRCs) is essential because it is the determinant of treatment strategies, including immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Yet, no attempt has been made to exploit transcriptomic profile and tumor microenvironment (TME) of it to unveil MSI status in CRC. Hence, we developed a novel TME-aware, single-transcriptome predictor of MSI for CRC, called MAP (Microsatellite instability Absolute single sample Predictor). MAP was developed utilizing recursive feature elimination-random forest with 466 CRC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and its performance was validated in independent cohorts, including 1118 samples. MAP showed robustness and predictive power in predicting MSI status in CRC. Additional advantages for MAP were demonstrated through comparative analysis with existing MSI classifier and other cancer types. Our novel approach will provide access to untouched vast amounts of publicly available transcriptomic data and widen the door for MSI CRC research and be useful for gaining insights to help with translational medicine.